← Back to meetings

Meeting City Council Formal Meeting-4/21/2021 complete

2021-04-21 · Formal

Items: 79

City Council Formal Meeting

View on Agenda Online ↗


Synced: 2026-05-28 03:37 AZ

Item text
For Approval or Correction, the Minutes of the Formal Meeting on Dec. 18, 2019

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of Dec. 18, 2019, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
St., 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 11



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
For Approval or Correction, the Minutes of the Formal Meeting on Jan. 8, 2020

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of Jan. 8, 2020, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
St., 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 12



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.




Page 13
ATTACHMENT A




To: City Council Date: April 21, 2021
From: Mayor Kate Gallego

Subject: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES

The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:

Fast Track Cities Ad Hoc Committee

I recommend the following for appointment:

Chad Stecher
Mr. Stecher is an Assistant Professor at Arizona State University and a resident of
District 8.

Human Trafficking Task Force

I recommend the following for appointment:

Libby Dwyer
Ms. Dwyer is a former paralegal at the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office.

Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee

Councilman Jim Waring recommends the following for appointment:

Abram Bowman
Mr. Bowman is a Partner at Lewis Brisbois and a resident of District 2. He fills a
vacancy for a term to expire November 19, 2022.




Page 14
Phoenix Business and Workforce Development Board

I recommend the following for appointment:

Allison Benezra
Ms. Benezra is a Senior Specialist of Campus Recruiting at Charles Schwab. She fills
the Business Financial Services vacancy for a term to expire June 30, 2023.

Ben Miller
Mr. Miller is the Human Resources Director at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Company. He fills a Business vacancy for a term to expire June 30, 2023.

Luke Tate
Mr. Tate is a Managing Director at ASU Enterprise Partners. He fills a Business
vacancy for a term to expire June 30, 2023.

South Mountain Village Planning Committee

I recommend the following for appointment:

Edward Aldama
Mr. Aldama is a Goal Achievement Coach at Your Greatest Self Coaching and a
resident of District 8. He replaces Matthew Aguilar for a partial term to expire
November 19, 2021.




Page 15



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Times 3 Sports Grille

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 06070175.

Summary

Applicant
Peter Schelstraete, Agent

License Type
Series 6 - Bar

Location
6525 W. Happy Valley Road, Ste. C109
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 1

This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a bar. This
location is currently licensed for liquor sales with a Series 6 - Bar, liquor license.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 8, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the


Page 16

applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Have extensive experience in the liquor industry and will comply with all laws
including Title IV and rules.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 17



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Kasai Asian Grill

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 012070003708.

Summary

Applicant
Kevin Kramber, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
14344 N. Scottsdale Road
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 2

This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a restaurant.
This location is currently licensed for liquor sales with a Series 12 - Restaurant, liquor
license.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 2, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,


Page 18

grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I currently represent over 180+ liquor licenses in the state of Arizona. Current on site
manager has approved Title IV liquor training. There have been no violations of Title IV
law at the restaurant since opening. All controlling persons should clear background
with no issues.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 19



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Dodey's Bar

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 06070605.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 6 - Bar

Location
3114 E. Cactus Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3

This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a bar. This
location is currently licensed for liquor sales with a Series 6 - Bar, liquor license.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 3, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the


Page 20

applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I was managing this bar for several years and am now the owner. I will continue to
abide by Title 4 liquor laws.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 21



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Inches Tacos

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 141858.

Summary

Applicant
Jared Repinski, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
3108 W. McDowell Road
Zoning Classification: C-3
Council District: 4

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 8, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.


Page 22


Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been representing liquor licensed establishments in Arizona for over 15 years.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Tourism plays an important role in our local economy and liquor licensed
establishments (the sale of alcohol) is a very important aspect of tourism. Therefore, if
the City of Phoenix continues to lead the State of Arizona by approving quality and
diverse businesses (restaurants, bars, microbreweries, distilleries, hotels, resorts, golf
courses, special events, convenience / grocery stores & gas stations) similar to this
proposed liquor licensed business all businesses will prosper in our tourism based
economy.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Inches Tacos
Liquor License Map - Inches Tacos

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 23
Liquor License Data: INCHES TACOS
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 2 0

Bar 6 3 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 0

Liquor Store 9 1 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 1

Restaurant 12 6 2


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 43.40 91.79 65.71

Violent Crimes 7.97 21.89 14.96
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 57 112

Total Violations 92 254




Page 24
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1121001 989 53 % 5% 35 %

1121002 1598 60 % 3% 32 %

1121003 1225 54 % 0% 46 %

1122012 2059 55 % 21 % 17 %

1126012 1987 42 % 16 % 47 %

1127001 1882 54 % 0% 25 %

1127004 673 79 % 31 % 33 %

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 25
Liquor License Map: INCHES TACOS
3108 W MCDOWELL RD




Ü
Date: 3/29/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 26



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Wok N'Roll

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 139439.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
2801 N. Central Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2 HRI TOD-1
Council District: 4

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 26, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations


Page 27

on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Wok N'Roll (Series 12)
4412 N. Miller Road, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am a current owner of the same concept in Scottsdale. I wanted to venture into
Phoenix and bring my great food and service to the area. I will continue to abide by
Title 4 liquor laws.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This location has been licensed with a liquor license. I want to continue provide that
service.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Wok N'Roll
Liquor License Map - Wok N'Roll

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 28
Liquor License Data: WOK N'ROLL
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 8 4

Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 1

Liquor Store 9 5 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 4

Hotel 11 2 1

Restaurant 12 35 11

Club 14 1 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 43.40 120.62 109.23

Violent Crimes 7.97 19.95 21.44
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 58 28

Total Violations 95 39




Page 29
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1105013 824 16 % 17 % 40 %

1105022 1216 28 % 19 % 23 %

1106004 1456 47 % 27 % 3%

1117004 1227 75 % 20 % 21 %

1118001 742 44 % 28 % 5%

1118002 1030 67 % 9% 17 %

1118003 996 65 % 15 % 4%

1118004 671 62 % 6% 6%

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 30
Liquor License Map: WOK N'ROLL
2801 N CENTRAL AVE




Ü
Date: 3/1/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 31



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Jimmy's Quick Stop

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 139294.

Summary

Applicant
Akram Jabaieh, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
2344 W. Glendale Ave.
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 5

This request is for a new liquor license for a beer and wine store. This location is
currently licensed for liquor sales with a Series 9 - Liquor Store, liquor license and
does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 24, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.




Page 32

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

AK Quick Stop (Series 10)
8802 S. Central Ave, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 20
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
Four letters protesting the issuance of this license have been received and are on file
in the Office of the City Clerk. The letters are from North Glen Square Neighborhood
Association, Lane Avenue Block Watch, Washington Park Neighborhood Association,
and Ocotillo Glen Neighborhood Association. They feel that the issuance of a liquor
license to this location would not be in the best interest of the community and that the
need and convenience of the community is met with other existing liquor licenses.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I hold a certificate for The Basic Liquor Law Training. This training provided me the
opportunity of learning the importance and significance of obtaining a beer and wine
license. I am assured to uphold the laws and regulations about beer and wine license.
I have never been involved in any criminal activity, no record of getting in trouble with
law and authorities.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This store will provide a safe and secure place for the neighborhood to buy beer and
wine. The location will be convenient for the people in neighborhood who may not
have access to transportation. Adding the long time experience of the owner with
running a store while upholding all the laws and regulations, the store will be a safe,
secure and convenience place for the customers to purchase quality liquor.”




Page 33

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances. Staff gave careful consideration to the
protest letter received, however after reviewing the application in its entirety staff is
recommending approval of this application.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - Jimmy's Quick Stop
Liquor License Map - Jimmy's Quick Stop

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 34
Liquor License Data: JIMMY'S QUICK STOP
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 3 1

Liquor Store 9 5 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 5

Restaurant 12 3 1

Club 14 1 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 43.40 147.45 151.38

Violent Crimes 7.97 38.45 43.63
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 59 140

Total Violations 97 265




Page 35
Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1059003 1609 59 % 5% 25 %

1060011 1487 31 % 17 % 50 %

1060021 1678 27 % 14 % 27 %

1060031 1266 32 % 33 % 51 %

1060032 1673 52 % 15 % 25 %

1068011 1652 2% 12 % 52 %

1068012 1670 5% 28 % 55 %

1068021 1099 60 % 0% 9%

1069001 1043 81 % 11 % 4%

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 36
Liquor License Map: JIMMY'S QUICK STOP
2344 W GLENDALE AVE




Ü
Date: 2/25/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 37



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Vektor Vodka

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 140481.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 4 - Wholesaler

Location
431 N. 47th Ave.
Zoning Classification: Ind. PK.
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a wholesaler. This location is currently
licensed for liquor sales with a Series 4 - Wholesaler, liquor license.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 3, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration may be given only to the applicant's personal
qualifications and not to the location.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Vektor Vodka (Series 4)
1661 N. Quail, Mesa
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix


Page 38

Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I will abide by all Title 4 liquor laws. Currently own a Series 4 at a different location
and have decided to move to a different warehouse.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 39



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - First Stop Market

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 135083.

Summary

Applicant
Lora Patch, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
2610 W. Baseline Road, Ste. 100
Zoning Classification: C-1
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit. This location requires a Use Permit to allow package liquor sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is April 30, 2021.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.




Page 40

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have over 30 years experience operating and managing small businesses. I have
the necessary finances and management experience, plus the work ethic and a long
history of providing outstanding customer experiences. I treat my customers and my co
-workers like family, and will always maintain a nice, clean, safe, friendly and fair
business.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We are in an area that, without our store, would require our customers to travel 1-2
miles in any direction to find the products and services we offer. We offer convenient
hours, easy check-out, fair pricing, and a wide selection of products that our neighbors
enjoy. We save our customers time, money, travel, and hassle. Our store is clean, well-
lit and well stocked.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Liquor License Data - First Stop Market
Liquor License Map - First Stop Market

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 41
Liquor License Data: FIRST STOP MARKET
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Liquor Store 9 1 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 2 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 43.40 36.75 31.42

Violent Crimes 7.97 4.43 3.71
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data
Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 58 23

Total Violations 95 29


Census 2010 Data 1/2 Mile Radius
BlockGroup 2010 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1166122 1483 77 % 0% 17 %

1166123 1051 98 % 0% 17 %

1166131 1193 81 % 0% 1%

1166132 1388 49 % 0% 31 %

1166133 1862 95 % 14 % 9%

Average 61 % 13 % 19 %




Page 42
Liquor License Map: FIRST STOP MARKET
2610 W BASELINE RD




Ü
Date: 3/5/2021
0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
mi


City Clerk Department
Page 43




PAYMENT ORDINANCE (Ordinance S-47465) (Items 12-15)
Ordinance S-47465 is a request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse funds, up to amounts indicated below, for the purpose of
paying vendors, contractors, claimants and others, and providing
additional payment authority under certain existing city contracts. This
section also requests continuing payment authority, up to amounts
indicated below, for the following contracts, contract extensions and/or
bids awarded. As indicated below, some items below require payment
pursuant to Phoenix City Code Section 42-13.

12 Kandy Lynn Evans
For $41,200.00 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or
about May 1, 2021, for a term of five years for nursing services for the
Baby Shot Program for the Fire Department. Kandy Lynn Evans will
provide licensed practical nurse services to assist with the administration
and management of vaccination/immunization clinics of the Phoenix Fire
Department's Baby Shot Program.

13 Callyo 2009 Corp. doing business as Callyo
For $18,260.00 in payment authority for an annual subscription to Callyo
Platinum Package Pro, which includes 25 Callyo lines, Callyo Pro feature,
platinum accessory pack and personalized on-site training, additional
unlimited lines, video licenses, and four Police Premium COVID-19 Relief
licenses, for the Police Department. The Drug Enforcement Bureau's
Street Enforcement and Human Exploitation and Trafficking squads
currently use the Callyo annual phone subscription and video licenses for
undercover investigations. The product provides seamless operations
between all squads working in joint investigations. The system provides
Police Department personnel the ability to monitor activities while
engaging in undercover operations. The evidence provided reduces the
amount of time detectives spend in court testifying and protects officers'
undercover identities.


Page 44


14 Applied Concepts, Inc. doing business as Stalker Radar
For $17,500.00 in payment authority to purchase 11 Stalker II Stationary
Radars for the Police Department. The Stalker Stationary radar gun is an
instrument used to measure the speed of an object and is essential for
the Traffic Bureau's daily operation. The Traffic Bureau uses this device
to enforce traffic laws, reduce excessive speeding, and promote safety
on City streets. Without these devices, police officers will not be able to
measure the speed of vehicles which can lead to higher rates of
collisions. The product will include a 24-month warranty and will be
purchased using grant funds from the Governor's Office of Highway
Safety.

15 The Myers-Briggs Company

For $64,065.00 in payment authority to purchase the Myers-Briggs Type
Inventory (MBTI) personality assessment tool from The Myers-Briggs
Company for the Human Resources Department. The MBTI is a key
training tool used in City leadership development training courses. The
assessment tool provides supervisors, managers, and executives with
insight into their personality preferences including communicating,
decision making, conflict resolution, managing change, interpersonal
interactions, and conflict situations. The outcome of these assessments is
for leaders to recognize how to best adapt their preferences to be a more
effective leader. The City training will include over 1,125 participants over
five years, starting April 7, 2021. Funding is available in the Human
Resources Department.




Page 45



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Selection of Vice Mayor

Request to permit the City Council to select one of its members to serve as Vice
Mayor, until such time of another Vice Mayor selection, pursuant to Phoenix City
Charter IV, section 3. Rule 7(c) of the Rules of Council Proceedings states that "The
Council shall select a new Vice Mayor once each calendar year at the first Formal
meeting in January or at the next regularly scheduled meeting after a Vice Mayor
vacancy occurs."

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the City Manager's Office.




Page 46



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Proposed 51st Avenue and Baseline Road Annexation - Authorization to File

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to file with the Maricopa
County Recorder's Office a blank petition for a proposed annexation. This annexation
was requested by Ernest and Miya Linsenmeyer for the purpose of receiving City of
Phoenix services. The proposed annexation conforms to current City policies and
complies with Arizona Revised Statutes section 9-471 regarding annexation.

Summary
Signatures on the proposed annexation petition shall not be obtained for a waiting
period of 30 days after filing the blank petition with the Maricopa County Recorder.
Additionally, a Public Hearing will be scheduled within this 30-day waiting period,
permitting the City Council to gather community input regarding the annexation
proposal. Formal adoption of this proposed annexation will be considered at a later
date.

Location
The proposed annexation area includes parcels 104-89-007J, 104-89-007B, 104-89-
007G and 104-89-007F located at 51st Avenue and Baseline Road (Attachment A).
The annexation area is approximately 6.55 acres (0.0103 sq. mi.) and the population
estimate is zero individuals.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the City Clerk
Department.




Page 47
ATTACHMENT A




Page 48



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Communication Equipment and Services - COOP 20-077 (Ordinance S-
47466)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into cooperative
participating agreements with ICOM America, Incorporated, E.F. Johnson Company,
Microwave Networks, Inc., Kelley Communications, Inc., Access Technologies, Inc.,
Durham Communications, Inc., Aviat U.S., Inc., DFW Communications, Inc., L3Harris
Technologies, Inc., and JVCKenwood USA Corporation, to purchase public
communications equipment and services for citywide use. A cooperative contract was
established by the State of Arizona under solicitation number ADSPO19-00008376.
Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The aggregate contract value will not exceed $18,552,000.

Summary
These cooperative agreements will allow Information Technology Services (ITS), Fire,
Police, and other city departments to purchase public safety radios and microwave
radios, provide services for the equipment and radios, as well as equipment for the
Regional Wireless Cooperative (RWC). They will primarily serve Phoenix Police and
Phoenix Fire departments by providing a contract vehicle that will allow the City to
replace portable radios which are on a seven-year replacement cycle. They will also
allow RWC to replace the microwave network which has adopted a 10-year
replacement cycle.

In addition to providing critical equipment to the City for Police and Fire, this contract
will provide equipment and support for the RWC microwave communications network,
with equipment located at approximately 80 sites, providing communication coverage
over 6,000 square miles. The microwave network is a main component of public safety
communications, including providing connectivity for more than 30,000 users of the
RWC public safety radio communications network. The City serves as the
“Administrative Managing Member” responsible for the administration and financial
management of the RWC. RWC is a cooperative formed under a series of
Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA) with membership being open to all local, county,
state, federal, and tribal government entities supporting over 14,000 first responder’s
radio communications. Through these memberships RWC will off-set our costs.



Page 49

Furthermore, this request will also support the Public Transit Department’s equipment
purchases for their Computer Aided Dispatch / Automatic Vehicle Locator (CAD/AVL)
system, used for bus communications, transit vehicle monitoring, and other public
transit service-related functions.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, a participating agreement is
required when the City uses a cooperative agreement from another public agency. The
contract was awarded through competitive processes consistent with the City's
procurement processes, as set forth in the Phoenix City Code, Chapter 43.

The State of Arizona contract covers the purchase of public communications
equipment and services as required by the ITS, Police and Fire departments. The
contract was awarded on Oct. 9, 2019. The use of this cooperative will provide the City
national discounts on these products. Additionally, review of pricing and availability
from registered small and local businesses indicates that this cooperative contract
offers the best value to the City.

Upon City Council approval of this item, a purchasing agreement(s) incorporating the
City’s terms and conditions will be fully executed between the referenced vendor(s)
and the City.

Both the American Bar Association and National Institute of Government Purchasing
endorse the use of Cooperative Agreements by municipalities and other public
institutions. An established best practice in government procurement, Cooperative
Agreements provide extensive benefits to procurement officials by leveraging volume
purchasing for maximum cost benefit and ensuring best value.

The Deputy Finance Director recommends that the cooperative participating
agreement with ICOM America, Incorporated, E.F. Johnson Company, Microwave
Networks, Inc., Kelley Communications, Inc., Access Technologies, Inc., Durham
Communications, Inc., Aviat U.S., Inc., DFW Communications, Inc., L3Harris
Technologies, Inc., and JVCKenwood USA Corporation, be accepted.

Contract Term
The five-year contract term shall begin on or about May 1, 2021.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $18,552,000. Funds are available in the
various departments' budgets.


Page 50


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher and the Finance Department.




Page 51



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Lease of City-Owned Property to AIA Arizona, American Institute of Architects -
Amendment 3 (Ordinance S-47467)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 130769 with AIA Arizona, American Institute of Architects, a non-profit
corporation (AIA) to extend the lease term for a three-year period plus two additional
one-year options. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept all funds
related to this item.

Summary
AIA currently leases approximately 4,425 square feet of interior office space on the
2nd floor of the J.W. Walker building located at 30 N. 3rd Ave. The current contract
term expires April 30, 2021. The agreement will be amended to extend the term for a
three-year period plus two additional one-year options. Base rent during the first year
of the three-year extension period will be $5,065.28 per month, plus applicable taxes,
which is within the range of market rents as determined by the Real Estate Division.
Base rent will increase annually thereafter based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
Each option period will be exercised upon mutual agreement of the City and AIA. AIA
has occupied this space since 2001 and is in good standing.

Financial Impact
Revenue during the first year of the three-year extension period will be $60,783.36 per
year, plus applicable taxes.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Lease of City-Owned Property to AIA Arizona Agreement 130769 (Ordinance S-
37723) on March 16, 2011;
· Lease of City-Owned Property to AIA Arizona Agreement 130769 - Amendment 1
(Ordinance S-37998) on June 15, 2011; and
· Lease of City-Owned Property to AIA Arizona Agreement 130769 - Amendment 2
(Ordinance S-42192) on Dec. 16, 2015.




Page 52

Location
30 N. 3rd Ave., 2nd Floor
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
and Finance departments.




Page 53



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acquisition of Real Property for Roadway and Railroad Improvements at the
Intersection of West Thomas Road and North 27th Avenue (Ordinance S-47469)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to acquire real property and
all related property interests by donation, purchase within the City's appraised value,
or by the power of eminent domain for roadway and railroad improvements at the
intersection of West Thomas Road and North 27th Avenue. Further request to
authorize dedication of land with public improvements to public use via separate
recording instrument. Additionally request to authorize the City Controller to disburse
all funds related to this item.

Summary
Acquisition of real property is required for roadway and railroad improvements at the
West Thomas Road and North 27th Avenue intersection. The project is on a priority
path to improve the crossing safety for pedestrians and the public. Improvements will
include signage, new Americans with Disabilities Act compliant sidewalks and ramps,
relocation of a traffic signal and markings at the crossings associated with the overall
safety improvement plan. The project is a collaborative and coordinated effort with the
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway.

The properties impacted by this project are identified in Attachment A.

Financial Impact
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget.

Location
Thomas Road and 27th Avenue.
Council Districts: 4 and 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation and Finance departments.




Page 54
Attachment A
Property Identification

Thomas Road and 27th Avenue Roadway and Railroad Improvement Project

The following improved and/or unimproved parcels affected by acquisition and
included in this request are identified by the Maricopa County Assessor’s parcel
number (APN) and the address or location.

APN Address / Location
108-06-001F 2720 W. Grand Ave.
108-06-005F 2738 W. Thomas Road
108-06-005G 2736 W. Thomas Road
108-06-032 Northwest corner of 27th Avenue and Thomas Road
108-08-013 2703 W. Thomas Road




Page 55



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend Ordinance for Acquisition of Real Property for Street Improvement
Project from Mountain View Road to Peoria Avenue between 15th and 7th
Avenues (Ordinance S-47481)

Request the City Council amend Ordinance S-45599 for authorization to acquire
additional parcels required for a street improvement project from Mountain View Road
to Peoria Avenue, between 15th and 7th avenues.

Summary
Additional parcels were identified during design that are necessary to accommodate
project construction. All other conditions and stipulations previously stated in the above
referenced ordinance will remain the same.

The additional parcels affected by this project and included in this request are
identified by Maricopa County Assessor's parcel number (APN) 158-30-127 located at
1401 W. Brown St. and APN 158-30-128 located at 1405 W. Brown St.

Financial Impact
The project is federally funded with funding available in the Street Transportation
Department's Capital Improvement Program budget.

Location
Area bounded by Mountain View Road to Peoria Avenue and 15th to 7th avenues.
Council District: 3

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Acquisition of Real Property for a Street Improvement Project from Mountain View
Road to Peoria Avenue between 15th and 7th Avenues (Ordinance S-45599) on
May 1, 2019; and
· Acquisition of Real Property for a Street Improvement Project from Mountain View
Road to Peoria Avenue between 15th and 7th Avenues - Amendment (Ordinance S-
46056) on Oct. 2, 2019.




Page 56

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation and Finance departments.




Page 57



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Accept Easements for Traffic Control Purposes Along 7th
Avenue, South of Buckeye Road (Ordinance S-47470)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept easements for traffic
control for the installation of a High-Intensity Activated Cross Walk (HAWK) signal
along 7th Avenue, south of Buckeye Road.

Summary
Memorial Key LLC, its successor and assigns, has agreed to donate easements for
the installation of a HAWK signal and Americans with Disabilities Act pedestrian ramps
to provide pedestrians a safe crossing at 7th Avenue, near the driveway entrance and
exit at Phoenix Memorial Hospital. The easements are approximately 449 square feet.

The parcel affected by this project and included in this request is identified by
Maricopa County Assessor's parcel number 112-36-045G located at 1201 S. 7th Ave.

Location
7th Avenue, south of Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation and Finance departments.




Page 58



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Grant Temporary Construction Easement and Dedicate
Sidewalk Easement over Portion of City-owned Property Along West Lynne Lane
at 11th Avenue (Ordinance S-47482)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to grant a temporary
construction easement to Lynne Village, LLC across City-owned property located at
6310 S. 7th Ave. Additionally, request authorization to dedicate a sidewalk easement to
public use via separate recording instrument. Further request authorization for the City
Treasurer to accept all funds related to this item.

Summary
The temporary construction easement and sidewalk dedication is required for the
construction of a sidewalk for the Lynne Village Apartments development (KIVA 19-
2976), adjacent to the City-owned property. Public improvements will be constructed
by the developer within Lynne Lane which is a private roadway for Foothills Village
Apartments; FVA, LLC leases the City-owned property and provided concurrence for
the easements.

Financial Impact
Revenue for the easement will be reflective of market value.

Location
6310 S. 7th Ave. identified by Maricopa County Assessor's parcel number 105-83-
002F.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Housing and
Finance departments.




Page 59



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance and Dedication of Easements for Sidewalk and Public Utility
Purposes (Ordinance S-47483)

Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate easements for sidewalk and public
utility purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below will meet the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
Applicant: Pepsquad Development, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 7710 W. Indian School Road
File: FN 210010
Council District: 5

Easement (b)
Applicant: GVCL Enterprises, L.L.C., its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 1935 W. Northern Ave.
File: FN 210008
Council District: 5

Easement (c)
Applicant: Peter L. Rizzo Holding Company, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 4910 E. Indian School Road
File: FN 210004
Council District: 6

Easement (d)
Applicant: Estate of John J. Sorci, deceased Probate Case number PB2020-
050124, its successor and assigns


Page 60

Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 4803 E. Chandler Blvd.
File: FN 210013
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.




Page 61



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance of Easements for Sewer and Vehicular Non-Access Purposes
(Ordinance S-47486)

Request for the City Council to accept easements for sewer and vehicular non-access
purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below will meet the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
Applicant: Host Camelback I, LLC, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Sewer
Location: 5943 N. Elsie Ave.
File: FN 210012
Council District: 6

Easement (b)
Applicant: Estate of John J. Sorci, deceased Probate Case number PB2020-
050124, its successor and assigns
Purpose: Vehicular Non-Access
Location: 4803 E. Chandler Blvd.
File: FN 210013
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.




Page 62



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Enter into Revocable License with Hunter Contracting Co. for
City-Owned Property Located at 3345 E. Roeser Road (Ordinance S-47489)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a revocable
license with Hunter Contracting Co. for approximately 5,000 square feet of the
unimproved portion of Esteban Park located at 3345 E. Roeser Road for construction
staging and storage. The license fee will be $1,400 for the initial term. Further request
authorization for the City Treasurer to accept all funds related to this item.

Summary
Hunter Contracting Co. has been contracted by the City to provide design and
construction services for the Roeser Road improvements from 32nd Street to 37th
Street. Approximately 5,000 square feet of the unimproved portion of Esteban Park will
be used for construction staging, parking and a construction trailer to facilitate the
City's project.

The term of the license will be for an initial seven months, with an option to extend on
a month-to-month basis, up to an additional five months. The license fee is $200 per
month, plus applicable taxes, or $1,400 for the initial term, which is within range of
market rents as determined by the Real Estate Division. Hunter Contracting Co. shall
provide insurance and indemnification acceptable to the City of Phoenix Finance
Department's Risk Management Division and Law Department. The license may be
canceled pursuant to Arizona Revised Statute 38-511, or upon 60-days' written notice.
The license may contain other terms and conditions deemed necessary by the City.

Contract Term
The term of the license will be seven months, with an option to extend on a month-to-
month basis, up to an additional five months.

Financial Impact
The license fee will be $1,400 for the initial term, plus applicable taxes.

Location
3345 E. Roeser Road, identified by assessor parcel number 122-71-002.
Council District: 8


Page 63


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Parks and
Recreation and Finance departments.




Page 64



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Heavy Duty Fleet, Construction and Agricultural/Industrial Parts, Service and
Accessories - COOP 21-067 (Ordinance S-47490)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a cooperative
participating agreement with Balar Holding Corporation dba Balar Equipment, Don
Sanderson Ford Inc. dba Sanderson Ford, Drake Truck Bodies LLC, FleetPride Inc.
and The WW Williams Company dba Auto Safety House to purchase heavy duty fleet,
construction and agricultural/industrial parts, services and accessories. A cooperative
contract was established by Maricopa County under solicitation number 200209-C.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The aggregate agreement value will not exceed $4,295,000.

Summary
The Public Works Department is responsible for maintaining a diverse fleet of over
7,300 vehicles and equipment, of which 2,344 are categorized as heavy-duty, 310 off-
road equipment, and 256 stationary generators. These pieces of equipment are
maintained not only at Public Works service centers but within operations at the City’s
transfer stations, landfill, and remote locations for generators. The adoption of this
agreement will supplement existing City agreements to ensure that Public Works has
the appropriate level of vendor support for these specialized vehicles.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, a participating agreement is
required when the City uses a cooperative agreement from another public agency. The
agreement was awarded through competitive processes consistent with the City's
procurement processes, as set forth in the Phoenix City Code, Chapter 43.

The Maricopa County agreement covers the purchase of heavy-duty fleet, construction
and agricultural/industrial parts, services and accessories as required by the Public
Works Department. The agreement began Oct. 1, 2020 and use of this cooperative will
provide the City competitive discounts on these products. Additionally, review of pricing
and availability from registered small and local businesses indicates that this
cooperative agreement offers the best value to the City.




Page 65

Upon City Council approval of this item, agreements incorporating the City’s terms and
conditions will be fully executed between the referenced vendors and the City.

Both the American Bar Association and National Institute of Government Purchasing
endorse the use of Cooperative Agreements by municipalities and other public
institutions. An established best practice in government procurement, Cooperative
Agreements provide extensive benefits to procurement officials by leveraging volume
purchasing for maximum cost benefit and ensuring best value.

The Deputy Finance Director recommends that the cooperative participating
agreement with Balar Holding Corporation dba Balar Equipment, Don Sanderson Ford
Inc. dba Sanderson Ford, Drake Truck Bodies LLC, FleetPride Inc. and The WW
Williams Company dba Auto Safety House be accepted.

Contract Term
The five-year agreement term will begin on or about June 1, 2021.

Financial Impact
The aggregate agreement value will not exceed $4,295,000. Funding is available in
the Public Works Department’s budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.




Page 66



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Purchase of Property and Casualty Insurance Policies for the City of Phoenix
(Ordinance S-47491)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to purchase various property
and casualty insurance policies on behalf of the City for July 2021 through June 2022.
Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse funds, not to exceed
$15,150,000.

Summary
Competitive quotes are sought from all viable commercial insurance markets to assure
the best coverage and cost available. The total estimated cost for all insurance is
approximately $15,150,000 for Fiscal Year 2021-2022, up from $11,629,465 in the
current year. The increase of $3,520,535 is due to: (1) a high demand for insurance
coverage in the property and excess liability coverage and a reduced supply of
capacity in the commercial insurance market throughout the country; (2) the City
experienced a large property loss over the last 10 years that exceeded $10 million; (3)
the City experienced its first loss that pierced the excess liability insurance; (4) claims
are increasing in frequency and severity throughout the country; and (5) insurers are
struggling to overcome underwriting losses.

Citywide insurance policies are purchased from the Risk Management Self-Insurance
Fund or the Workers' Compensation Self-Insurance Fund and are then allocated to
each department's budget. Funds for special policies purchased are available from
those departments budgets.

Insurance Policy Type Department Estimated Cost

Blanket Property and Boiler and Citywide $7,241,000.00
Machinery Insurance

Excess Liability Insurance Citywide $5,870,000.00
(Multiple Layers)

Excess Workers' Compensation Citywide $352,000.00
Insurance


Page 67


Network Security and Cyber Citywide $540,000.00

Police Aircraft Liability and Hull Police $200,000.00
Insurance

Aviation Airport Liability Aviation $697,000.00
Insurance

Miscellaneous Property and Casualty Citywide $250,000.00
Insurance

Financial Impact
The amount will not exceed $15,150,000, comprised of funds from the Risk
Management Self-Insurance Fund, and are included in the Fiscal Year 2021-2022
budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher and the Finance Department.




Page 68



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Stable Value Fund Manager Services (Ordinance S-47505)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Principal Global Investors, LLC to provide Stable Value Fund Manager services in an
amount not to exceed $5.3 million over a five-year period. No disbursement of funds
from the City Controller is required for this contract. The administrative costs are paid
by plan participants.

Summary
This contract is needed to provide professional management of the Phoenix Stable
Income Fund including discretionary investment management of the underlying
securities as well as the wrap providers for a stable value portfolio totaling
approximately $445 million in assets. The Contractor will maintain knowledge of the
federal laws and regulations applicable to such funds and will manage the assets in
the Fund in a manner consistent with the requirements of such laws and regulations.

Procurement Information
RFP HR 20-123 was conducted in accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10.
The Human Resources Department received eight offers and one offer was deemed
non-response. The Notice of Solicitation was emailed to 48 vendors registered in
ProcurePHX and 18 firms provided by the Consultant, Hyas Group. The offers were
scored on the following criteria: Qualifications and Experience (250 points), Method of
Approach (500 points) and Price (250 points).

The City’s Financial Investment Consultant, Hyas Group, conducted an analysis of the
offers and provided a report to the evaluation committee. Evaluation occurred by a four
-person panel. The evaluation committee determined that two offers were within the
competitive range, and those offerors participated in Finalists Interviews and Best and
Final Offers (BAFO) process. It was the consensus of the evaluation committee to
recommend awarding the contract to Principal Global Investors, LLC.

The City of Phoenix Employees’ Deferred Compensation Board approved the award
recommendation at the March 18, 2021 Special Session Board meeting.




Page 69

The following are the scores of all responsive Offerors:
Principal Global Investors, LLC 838.00
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. 800.00
Voya Financial 639.50
The Vanguard Group, Inc. 627.00
Galliard Capital Management, Inc. 609.50
Invesco Advisers, Inc 584.50
J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. 508.50

The Human Resources Director recommends the offer from Principal Global Investors,
LLC be accepted as the highest-scored, responsive, and responsible offeror.

Contract Term
The five-year contract shall begin on or about May 21, 2021.

Financial Impact
The aggregate five-year contract value for these services shall not exceed $5.3 million.
No disbursement of funds from the City Controller is required for this contract. The
administrative costs are paid by plan participants.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the Human
Resources Department.




Page 70



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Transfer of Retirement Funds to Arizona State Retirement System (Ordinance S-
47492)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to transfer retirement funds for
Kathryn Sorensen in the amount of $150,930.53 to the Arizona State Retirement
System, and further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse funds.

Summary
Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes, sections 38-730 and 38-922, retirement service
credits for former members of the City of Phoenix Employees’ Retirement System
(COPERS) may be transferred to the Arizona State Retirement System (ASRS) upon
approval by the Council. The following former City of Phoenix employee has requested
transfer of the balance of their credited service:

Sorensen, Kathryn: $150,930.53

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item will be approved by the COPERS Board at its April 1, 2021 meeting.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Toni Maccarone and the Retirement
Office.




Page 71



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Contract with UMOM New Day Centers, Inc. for COVID-19 Rapid Rehousing Case
Management Services (Ordinance S-47502)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract
with UMOM New Day Centers, Inc. to provide rapid rehousing case management
services to families impacted by COVID-19. The term of this contract will begin on or
about July 1, 2021 through Sept. 30, 2022. The contract total will not exceed $507,740
over the life of the contract. Further request authorization for the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. Funding is one-time Emergency Solutions Grant
(ESG) monies from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
There is no impact to the General Fund.

Summary
UMOM New Day Centers, Inc. will provide rapid rehousing case management services
to families impacted by COVID-19. These services include housing relocation and
stabilization services and/or short- and/or medium-term rental assistance to help
individuals or families living in shelters or in places not meant for human habitation to
move into permanent housing and achieve stability in that housing.

Procurement Information
The City of Phoenix has obtained all necessary federal waivers to alleviate the need to
comply with federal procurement guidelines.

Contract Term
The term of this contract will begin on or about July 1, 2021 through Sept. 30, 2022.

Financial Impact
The total value of this contract shall not exceed $507,740. Funding is one-time ESG
through the HUD. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On Feb. 17, 2021, City Council approved an allocation of ESG funds for Rapid
Rehousing for women and families.




Page 72

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Human
Services Department.




Page 73



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request Authorization to Submit Federal Transit Administration Coronavirus
Grant Applications (Ordinance S-47494)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for, accept, and
distribute Federal Transit Administration Coronavirus Response and Relief
Supplemental Appropriations Act grants and to enter into any agreements necessary to
receive those federal grants. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept,
and the City Controller to disburse, all grant funds in accordance with the terms of the
aforementioned grants and agreements. These grants are anticipated for an amount
not to exceed $85,856,151.

Summary
The City of Phoenix is the designated recipient of Federal Transit Administration (FTA)
grant funds for the Phoenix-Mesa Urbanized Area. Phoenix submits FTA grant
applications on behalf of all local governments and agencies in the region. On Dec. 27,
2020, the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act
(CRRSAA) was approved with funding provided through existing FTA formula
programs at 100 percent federal share, with no local match required. Such funding is
available to support capital, operating, and other expenses to prevent, prepare for, and
respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG), as the Metropolitan Planning
Organization for the Phoenix metropolitan area, is responsible for programming FTA
funds for the region. MAG has allocated the CRRSAA Act funding for the region to
support transit operations. Phoenix is expected to receive $43,171,577 for itself from
this allocation.

Financial Impact
The total of all grant funds in the applications is $85,856,151. The applications and
total federal amounts by fund type are:
· $85,260,499 - FTA Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula funding apportioned to
the Phoenix-Mesa Urbanized Area; and
· $595,652 - FTA Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with
Disabilities funding apportioned to the Phoenix-Mesa Urbanized Area.



Page 74

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was recommended for approval by the Transportation, Infrastructure and
Innovation Subcommittee on April 7, 2021 by a vote of 4-0.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Transit
Department.




Page 75



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request to Amend Contract with Teaching Strategies, LLC for Head Start Birth to
Five Program (Ordinance S-47475)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Contract
141887 with Teaching Strategies, LLC for the Head Start Birth to Five program by
extending the term of the contract through June 30, 2023 and increasing the contract
amount by $160,000. The extension will provide continued use of the online child
assessment tool. Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Summary
To ensure statewide consistency in early childhood assessment, the Arizona
Department of Education (ADOE) mandates all early childhood programs purchase the
same assessment tool. The Head Start Birth to Five program utilizes Teaching
Strategies Gold, the approved ADOE assessment tool. The early childhood
assessment tool is designed to measure children's progress, appropriately plan for
children's learning, implement best practices, and meet the accountability
requirements of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004,
Part B, Section 619. The City entered into a contract with Teaching Strategies, LLC on
July 1, 2015, following the ADOE statewide contract.

Procurement Information
Teaching Strategies was selected through an ADOE Request for Proposal RFP-ADED
15-00004546 for a statewide Early Childhood Assessment tool to be utilized by other
state agencies, political subdivisions, and Head Start grantees.

The ADOE contract with Teaching Strategies expired on March 22, 2020. ADOE
entered into a one-year agreement, Agreement CTR048634, with Teaching Strategies,
LLC extending the contract terms through June 30, 2021, allowing time to procure a
new provider. Due to the coronavirus pandemic, ADOE was unable to complete the
procurement process. As such, an additional extension through June 30, 2023 with
Teaching Strategies has been secured by ADOE.

In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, a Determination Memo citing a
need to extend the City's current contract beyond the maximum option years was


Page 76

approved on April 10, 2020.

Contract Term
The original five-year contract began on July 1, 2015, with four one-year extension
options exercised by the City Manager. Approval of this request would extend the
contract through June 30, 2023.

Financial Impact
The total value of this agreement will not exceed $544,000 over the life of the contract.
Funding is available from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Administration of Children, Youth and Families. There is no impact on the General
Fund.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
An extension through Dec. 31, 2020, was approved by City Council on June 3, 2020,
with Ordinance S-46682. An additional extension through June 30, 2021, was
approved by the City Council on Sept. 2, 2020.

The Head Start Policy Council will vote on this item on April 12, 2021.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Human
Services Department.




Page 77



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Convert Temporary Full-Time Positions to Regular Full-Time
Positions to Support Human Services Department Business and Workforce
Development Services (Ordinance S-47496)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to convert eight temporary full
-time positions to regular full-time positions in the Human Services Department. No
General Fund dollars are requested to support this request; Workforce Innovation and
Opportunity Act (WIOA) grant funds are available.

Summary
The request to convert the temporary positions is due to funding that was previously
provided by the U.S. Department of Labor under the Strengthening Working Families
Initiative Grant ending on June 30, 2021. In order to continue the delivery of free
training and childcare services to City of Phoenix residents who qualify, the Human
Services Department is requesting that eight temporary full-time positions be
converted to regular full-time positions. See Attachment A for the positions being
requested to be converted.

Financial Impact
The estimated full-year costs for these positions in Fiscal Year 2021-2022 is estimated
to be $690,000. No General Fund dollars are requested to support this request; WIOA
grant funds are available.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Human
Services Department.




Page 78
Attachment A
Human Services Department
Business and Workforce Development Position Conversions




Position/Job Code

Admin Aide (1) 326


Caseworker II (3) 028

Training Specialist (1) 030

Workforce Development Specialist (1) 031

Business Systems Analyst (1) 033

Workforce Development Supervisor (1) 037




Page 79



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend Contract with Local Initiatives Support Coalition (Ordinance S-47498)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Contract 153102-0
with the Local Initiatives Support Coalition to add $14,375 in Community Development
Block Grant program funds for a contract total of $2,314,375. Further request
authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds associated with this
agreement. The Community Development Block Grant Program is funded by the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development; no General Funds are required.

Summary
The Phoenix RISE Microbusiness Grant Program was approved by City Council
through Ordinance S-46606 as part of the 2015-2020 Consolidated Plan's 2019
Annual Action Plan CARES Act Amendment. The purpose of this grant program was to
assist microenterprise businesses who have five or fewer employees, that have been
impacted by the COVID-19 public health crisis, by providing funding for lost revenue,
the provisions of goods or services to respond to COVID-19, or the business model
changes to support COVID-19.

This program awarded $2,000,000 in CARES Act Community Development Block
Grant funds (CDBG-CV) through 276 grants to low- and moderate-income
microenterprise business owners in amounts up to $10,000. Additionally, $300,000 in
CDBG-CV funding was utilized for the purposes of Local Initiatives Support Coalition's
program administration, planning and coordination services. Due to the overwhelming
need of the microenterprise business community, the initial allocation was extinguished
before the final three eligible applicants could be awarded.

The Neighborhood Services Department seeks authorization to use an additional
$12,500 in CDBG funding to award the three remaining low- and moderate-income
microenterprise business owner grant applications and $1,875 in CDBG funding for
program administration costs. The total additional contract amount equates to $14,375.

Contract Term
The contract expires on May 31, 2021.




Page 80

Financial Impact
The CDBG Program is funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development; no General Funds are required.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This program was adopted by the City Council on May 6, 2020.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Neighborhood
Services Department.




Page 81



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Community Development Block Grant Neighborhood Commercial Rehabilitation
Program Loan Agreement (Ordinance S-47499)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a loan agreement
with Sandhu Investments, LLC for up to $100,000 in Community Development Block
Grant program funds for facade and site improvements through the Neighborhood
Commercial Rehabilitation program for their tenant, Hotel Electric, LLC and to take all
actions and execute all documents necessary to complete the loan. Further request
authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds associated with this
agreement. The CDBG Program is funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development; no General Funds are required.

Summary
The Neighborhood Commercial Rehabilitation (NCR) program offers Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding for property owners to complete exterior
improvements through a deferred loan, secured by a Deed of Trust which is forgiven
over a period of up to 10 years. The program was approved by City Council through
Ordinance S-46657 as part of the 2020-2024 CDBG Consolidated Plan. NCR projects
are selected through an open application process.

Hotel Electric, LLC is an electrical company that has primarily served Phoenix's
hospitality industry and multi-family residential developments since 1996; they employ
21 full-time and 10 seasonal employees at the project site for a total of 31 employees.
The proposed exterior improvements include grading and drainage repairs, with the
installation of a retainage bioswale, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
modifications, parking lot improvements, building facade and roof drainage
renovations, and new signage. Hotel Electric, LLC is a tenant, therefore the deferred
loan will be executed with the property owner, Sandhu Investments, LLC.

The goal of the NCR program is to support the revitalization or improvement of
commercial buildings along targeted business corridors to ensure the long-term
sustainability of the community, its businesses and structures. Eligible economic
revitalization projects must provide a public benefit or deliver neighborhood
enhancements including job creation for local residents, blight elimination, or the
provision of qualified goods or services to residents of targeted, low- and moderate-


Page 82

income areas in Phoenix.

Financial Impact
The CDBG Program is funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development; there is no impact to the General Fund.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was recommended for approval by the Land Use and Livability
Subcommittee on March 17, 2020 by a unanimous vote.

Location
10402 N. 19th Ave. (North Mountain Redevelopment Area)
Council District: 3

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Neighborhood
Services Department.




Page 83



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Community Development Block Grant Neighborhood Commercial Rehabilitation
Program Recipient (Ordinance S-47500)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a loan agreement
with Greek Family, LLC. (dba Greektown Restaurant) for up to $100,000 in Community
Development Block Grant program funds for facade and site improvements through
the Neighborhood Commercial Rehabilitation program, and to take all actions and
execute all documents to complete the loan. Further request authorization for the City
Controller to disburse all funds associated with this agreement. The Community
Development Block Grant Program is funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development; no General Funds are required.

Summary
The Neighborhood Commercial Rehabilitation (NCR) program offers Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding to complete exterior improvements through
a deferred loan, secured by a Deed of Trust, that is forgiven over a period of up to 10
years. The program was approved by City Council through Ordinance S-46657 as part
of the 2020-2024 CDBG Consolidated Plan. NCR projects are selected through an
open application process.

Greektown Restaurant is a full-service establishment that has served classic Greek
cuisine to the Sunnyslope area for 22 years. The project scope of work includes
facade and parapet improvements and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) parking
lot enhancements; and a new patio for outdoor dining as an alternate bid, if funding is
available.

The goal of the NCR program is to support the revitalization or improvement of
commercial buildings along targeted business corridors to ensure the long-term
sustainability of the community, its businesses, and structures. Eligible economic
revitalization projects must provide a public benefit or deliver neighborhood
enhancements including job creation for local residents, blight elimination, or the
provision of qualified goods or services to residents of targeted, low- and moderate-
income areas in Phoenix.




Page 84

Financial Impact
The CDBG Program is funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development; there is no impact to the General Fund.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was recommended for approval by the Land Use and Livability
Subcommittee on March 17, 2021 by a unanimous vote.

Location
8519 N. 7th St. (Target Area F Redevelopment Area)
Council District: 3

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Neighborhood
Services Department.




Page 85



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
MOU with American Forests on Tree Equity Projects

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Memorandum
of Understanding between the City of Phoenix and American Forests for a five-year
collaboration to achieve a shared vision of “tree equity” in Phoenix neighborhoods.
There is no financial impact to the City associated with this item.

Summary
Trees are more than just scenic amenities in neighborhoods fortunate enough to have
them; they are critical infrastructure that improve quality of life by lessening the
impacts of climate change and corresponding heat-related illnesses, dramatically
improving air quality, increasing positive behaviors, and providing tree care industry
careers. Tree Equity is the term American Forests trademarked to raise awareness
about the need to address historic disparities in tree canopy in cities throughout the
United States.

American Forests is the oldest national nonprofit conservation organization in the
United States. Since its founding in 1875, they have been the pathfinders for creating
healthy forests from coast to coast. In the early 1900s, for example, they rallied forest
advocates to champion creation of the U.S. Forest Service, and in 2018, won a decade
-long campaign persuading Congress to provide stable funding for preventing and
fighting forest fires.

Today, American Forests is focused on building a reforestation movement in America,
by partnering with cities to grow the urban forest in neighborhoods that need it most--
heat vulnerable communities that have a limited tree canopy. American Forests has
established connections with businesses and philanthropy desiring to invest in
vulnerable communities, and has selected a handful of communities to partner with,
including Phoenix--given our clear goals, a growing investment in the urban forest, and
vision for the path forward.

Goal of Tree Equity Partnership
Achieving Tree Equity means all of Phoenix’s neighborhoods will reach a minimal
standard of tree canopy cover that is feasible and appropriate for the city’s desert
climate and conditions by 2030.The Phoenix Tree Equity Partnership will use American


Page 86

Forests’ impact model to pursue Tree Equity and produce outcomes at scale across
the City. Partners will focus on the six different aspects of the impact model, shown
below.

1. Stakeholder Facilitation - The social, public health and environmental benefits trees
provide impact both individual people and governmental services on many levels.
The City and American Forests will collaborate and invite further collaboration with
neighborhood and community groups, nonprofit organizations, industry
professionals, academic researchers and county, state, tribal and federal agencies
also wanting to contribute to achieving a citywide Tree Equity goal. Facilitation and
other roles will be determined based on staffing capacity and funding.
2. Planning - The partnership will use as-needed technical resources such as existing
Phoenix tree canopy inventories and assessments, walk-shed and “cool corridor”
mapping analyses, the findings of the urban forest climate vulnerability assessment
recently undertaken by the U.S. Forest Service (Northern Institute of Applied
Climate Science) and American Forests’ Tree Equity Score Analyzer, Vibrant Cities
Lab and Career Pathways Action Guide. The objective is to identify existing
inequities in tree canopy cover throughout Phoenix and optimize the urban forest for
future climate scenarios to protect public health. Similar scientific resources that
optimize protection of existing trees and planting new ones for public health and
climate change outcomes will be used whenever possible.
3. Advocacy - Partners will cooperate with one another to engage state and federal
policy makers, agencies and civic leaders to attract resources and advance
programs that help every census block group neighborhood achieve a passing Tree
Equity Score.
4. Funding - Existing levels of funding for urban forestry are inadequate. Partners to
this agreement will collaborate amongst themselves and with other stakeholders to
align the funding needs necessary to achieve Tree Equity with the interests of
governmental, corporate and philanthropic funding entities as appropriate. Partners
will also make use of innovative funding alternatives such as exploring
environmental impact investing and carbon credits.
5. Planting and Protecting - Achieving Tree Equity across the Phoenix region will be a
function of preserving existing tree canopy and planting new trees in locations
where their climate and public health benefits are maximized. Tree planting and
maintenance work also offers the opportunity to advance Tree Equity even further
by intentionally training and hiring people from population groups who have typically
been under-represented in urban forestry careers.
6. Communicating and Replicating - Achieving Tree Equity will only be achievable and
sustainable if the benefits and progress of doing so are widely shared and made
known. Partners will identify strategic opportunities and milestones and use the
commercial and proprietary broadcast, print and electronic media resources


Page 87

available to them to promote Tree Equity efforts.

This Memorandum of Understanding reflects a commitment among the parties to work
toward the vision and purpose described above. This Memorandum of Understanding
is an affirmative expression of each partner’s intent to collaborate by putting forth their
best, professional efforts and does not obligate or restrict the activity of any party in
any way.

Contract Term
The Memorandum of Understanding will remain in effect for five years from the date of
signing but could be cancelled with 60-days’ notice by either party.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact associated with this item.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Innovation Subcommittee approved this item on
April 7, 2021, by a vote of 4-0.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Office of
Sustainability.




Page 88



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Recreation Management Software Application Upgrades (Ordinance S-47497)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to critical online improvements to the Parks and
Recreation Department's current recreation management software application used by
the City. The total payment authority requested is $24,000, to be paid in two phases.

Summary
The Parks and Recreation Department utilizes ActiveNet, the recreation management
software application for facility rentals, activity registration, membership management,
league management, point of sale, reports and credit card processing. The provider is
Active Network.

Currently, if members of the public desire to make reservations for sports fields, courts,
classrooms, certain ramadas and other permits, they must contact staff during
business hours and/or visit a physical location, such as a division office or recreation
center. During the COVID-19 pandemic, recreation centers have been closed, making
it more difficult for the public to make reservations.

In order to respond appropriately to the changing environment the pandemic has
presented, and to provide a higher level of service to the community, staff was
approved to work with Active Network to begin the software reconfiguration necessary
to provide the public with the ability to make reservations online. The ActiveNet system
already allows for the ability to pay for classes and beer permits online; therefore, the
Active Network Remote Refresher and System Optimization software will further
enhance online offerings, making additional reservations/permits available to the public
online.

Because the existing contract with Active Network, Agreement 148327, is revenue-
based, a payment authority was not previously requested; therefore, at present there is
not a payment mechanism for the software reconfiguration services.

Contract Term
Agreement 148327 was entered into in 2018, for a term of five years with an option to
extend for another five-year period, making Active Network a sole-source provider of


Page 89

the proprietary functions being provided.

Financial Impact
The total payments to Active Network pursuant to this project will not exceed $24,000.
Funds are available in the Parks and Recreation Department's budget.

Emergency Clause
Active Network agreed to begin providing the software reconfiguration services
described herein, which are time sensitive due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
The requested emergency clause is needed to pay Active Network prior to the typical
30-day period required for the ordinances to go into effect.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Inger Erickson and the Parks and
Recreation Department.




Page 90



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Aircraft Rescue Firefighter Training (Ordinance S-47504)

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement with the Dallas Fort Worth (DFW) International Airport
Fire Training Resource Center for Aircraft Rescue Firefighter Training for the Fire
Department. Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse funds
required for this item.

Summary
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PSHIA) has Aircraft Rescue Firefighting
(ARFF) capability. In order to maintain this capability, City of Phoenix Fire Department
(PFD) firefighters stationed at PSHIA must train in accordance with Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) standards. These standards mandate that PFD firefighters train
with live burn exercises each year, and every third year the training must be held at a
facility with multiple, simultaneously burning full-scale aircraft. DFW meets or exceeds
the Index D training facility requirements by the FAA.

There are very few large-scale training sites located across the United States that
meet the Index D training facility requirements set by the FAA. ARFF requires a site
with ample flight availability and proximity to allow an approximate 24 hour turn around
training for students. DFW is a large-scale training facility and meets the flight and
proximity requirements.

DFW has taken exception to the indemnification and liability provisions in the contract.
PFD is seeking an exception to Phoenix Code section 42-18 in allowing for
indemnification against any liability, claim, loss, damage or expenses, including without
limitation, reasonable attorney fees, arising from its negligent acts or omissions in
connection with its performance of the agreement, or its failure to comply with the
terms of the agreement, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. PFD is
also seeking an exception to Phoenix Code section 42-18 in allowing a limitation of
damages not to exceed $5,000,000.

Contract Term
The contract term shall begin on or about April 21, 2021 and end April 20, 2026.



Page 91

Financial Impact
Maximum total five-year contract value could be up to $500,000. The funds are in the
Aviation Department's budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Jeff Barton and the Fire Department.




Page 92



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Aviation Glass Repair, Replacement and Maintenance Services Agreement
(Ordinance S-47484)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to consent to assignment and
assumption of Aviation Glass Repair, Replacement and Maintenance Services
Agreement 152953 from True View Windows and Glass Block, Inc. which had changed
its name to True-Point Ventures, Inc to True View Windows and Glass LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company. All terms and conditions of the Agreement will
remain the same and there is no additional financial impact as part of this request.

Summary
Agreement 152953 (Agreement) provides glass repair, replacement, installation and
maintenance services for facilities throughout Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport,
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport, and the Phoenix Goodyear Airport. True-Point Ventures,
Inc (Assignor) is assigning the Agreement to True View Windows and Glass LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (Assignee). This assignment and assumption
require the City's prior approval.

Contract Term
The Agreement started Oct. 1, 2020 for a five-year aggregate term with no options to
extend.

Financial Impact
The Agreement was authorized for an amount not-to-exceed $1 million for the five-year
aggregate agreement term. There is no change to the financial impact.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Aviation Glass Repair, Replace and Maintenance Services
Agreement 152953 (Ordinance S-46913) on Sept. 16, 2020.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport - 702 W. Deer Valley Road
Phoenix Goodyear Airport - 1658 S. Litchfield Road, Goodyear, Ariz.
Council Districts: 1, 8 and Out of City


Page 93


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 94



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fuel Supply System Compliance Inspection, Testing, Maintenance and Repair
Services - Agreement Recommendation (Ordinance S-47485)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with A&H Contracting Services, Inc. for compliance inspection, testing, maintenance
and repair services for the Aviation Department. Further request authorization for the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The agreement amount will not
to exceed $300,000.

Summary
The contractor will provide compliance inspections, testing, maintenances, and repair
services for the fuel systems at various fuel sites throughout Phoenix Sky Harbor
International Airport, Phoenix Deer Valley Airport, and Phoenix Goodyear Airport.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid (IFB) 21-006 was conducted in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10. One bid was received on Feb. 3, 2021 from A&H Contracting
Services, Inc. The offer was evaluated based on the minimum qualifications, price,
responsive and responsible to provide the required goods and services. The offer from
A&H Contracting Services, Inc. is deemed to be fair and reasonable based on the
market and the previous contract pricing.

Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about April 1, 2021 for a five-year aggregate term, with
no options to extend.

Financial Impact
The agreement value will not exceed $300,000 for the five-year aggregate agreement
term. Funding is available in the Aviation Department's budget.

Locations
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport - 702 W. Deer Valley Road
Phoenix Goodyear Airport - 1658 S. Litchfield Road, Goodyear, Ariz.
Council Districts: 1, 8 and Out of City


Page 95


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 96



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Executive Hangar Lease at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (Ordinance
S-47493)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an Executive
Hangar Lease with Modern Industries, Inc. at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport
for two years, with two, one-year options to extend the term of the Lease.

Summary
Modern Industries, Inc. (Modern) currently subleases space from Honeywell
International, Inc. at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport where they are engaged
in the aerospace and semiconductor industries. Modern has requested to lease
Executive Hangar E13 to store the company's aircraft.

Contract Term
The term will be for two years, with two, one-year options to extend the Lease.

Financial Impact
Rent for the first year of the lease will be approximately $29,645 ($7.04 per square
foot). Rent will be adjusted annually based on the Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale Consumer
Price Index. Total anticipated revenue over the term, if all options are exercised, will be
approximately $118,582.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
· The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended this item for approval on March
18, 2021, by a vote of 9-0.
· The Transportation, Infrastructure and Innovation Subcommittee recommended this
item for approval on April 7, 2021, by a vote of 4-0.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.


Page 97



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Parking Access Revenue Control System Maintenance and Technical Support
Contract - Extension (Ordinance S-47501)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to extend the existing
Contract 142643 with Scheidt & Bachmann USA, Inc. for ongoing maintenance and
technical support of the Parking Access Control System at Phoenix Sky Harbor
International Airport. Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The agreement value will not exceed $7,812,000.

Summary
Parking is the largest non-aeronautical revenue source at the airport, and the Parking
Access Control System (PARCS) is the underlying technology which facilitates that
operation. PARCS supports the operation of nine parking facilities with approximately
26,000 parking spaces. The system consists of airport-wide infrastructure that includes
43 entries, 39 exits, nine pay-on-foot kiosks, and 72 license-plate revenue control
cameras. This hardware is actuated by parking management software that enables
passengers and employees to park in various airport parking facilities and pay their
parking fees. Prior to COVID-19, the system processed approximately 3.1 million
parking transactions and generated revenue exceeding $90 million per year.

PARCS is a highly complex system and is tightly integrated with several other key
airport systems, including SAP for revenue management, a third-party Online
Reservations System, Aviation’s Security and Access Control System and Employee
Parking System for access control, and the Chase Bank payment system. Under the
current support contract, the vendor provides maintenance services, including 24/7
technical support, software updates, firmware updates, security patches, system
enhancements and modifications, repair and replacement, and onsite/remote
troubleshooting for operational issues. The system currently performs as expected and
meets the Airport's needs. From a life-cycle perspective, the current system has useful
life remaining and does not require major hardware or software upgrades or
replacements. The current support contract expires May 31, 2021.

The estimated implementation cost for a brand-new system is approximately $10.5
million with an annual maintenance cost of $1.25 million, resulting in a total cost of
ownership of $16.75 million over five years. The current maintenance contract, if


Page 98

extended, would result in annual maintenance cost of $1.56 million, or a total cost of
ownership of $7.8 million over five years. Considering the scope and scale of the
system, a replacement would also take approximately two or more years and require
the current contract to be extended for a minimum of three years to allow for a new
solicitation followed by the implementation. Extending the existing contract will ensure
that maintenance and technical support will not be interrupted and foregoing a
replacement effort at this time will result in a significant cost savings and mitigate any
revenue loss for the Aviation Department.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Contract Term
The contract extension will begin on or about June 1, 2021 for an initial two-year term,
with three one-year options to extend for a five-year aggregate contract term.

Financial Impact
The contract extension value will not exceed $7,812,000 for the five-year term
aggregate term, with an estimated annual cost of $1,562,400. Funding is available in
the Aviation Department's budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
· The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended this item for approval on March
18, 2021, by a vote of 9-0.
· The Transportation, Infrastructure and Innovation Subcommittee recommended this
item for approval on April 7, 2021, by a vote of 4-0.

Location
Parking facilities at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 99



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
United States of America and State of Arizona Airport Joint Use Agreement at
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (Ordinance S-47503)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Joint Use
Agreement with the United States of America, acting by and through Chief, National
Guard Bureau, and the State of Arizona, acting by and through the Adjutant General
(collectively known as Air National Guard [ANG]) at Phoenix Sky Harbor International
Airport. The term of this Agreement will be for 10 years. The rent over the agreement
term will be $1,014,000.

Summary
The Joint Use Agreement allows the ANG use of Phoenix Sky Harbor International
Airport (PHX) facilities that are open to the public, which includes, but is not limited to:
runways, taxiways, lighting systems, navigational aids, markings, and appurtenances.
The Aviation Department is responsible for maintaining the public facilities at PHX. The
ANG will be responsible for any damages to public facilities at PHX, if such damage is
caused solely by the ANG. Although City Council previously authorized a five-year
term on Oct. 16, 2019, ANG has requested a 10-year term.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement will be ten years with no options to extend.

Financial Impact
Rent over the term of the agreement will be $1,014,000.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Air National Guard Joint Use Agreement (Ordinance S-
46115) on Oct. 16, 2019.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Council District: 8




Page 100

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Page 101



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fluid Analysis - Agreement Recommendation (Ordinance S-47472)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Empire Southwest, LLC to provide fluid analysis on the City's fleet vehicles and
equipment. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related
to this item. This item will have an aggregate amount of $235,000.

Summary
The Public Works Department maintains a fleet of over 6,800 vehicles and equipment,
including light, medium, and heavy-duty units. This agreement will provide the ability
for technicians to collect and ship fluid, such as oil or transmission fluid, to a local
vendor for the purpose of analyzing the fluid for contaminants. The units tested under
this agreement range from daily driven fleet cars and trucks to emergency response
vehicles and equipment such as fire apparatus and police patrol units. This agreement
will be used to support fleet managed by Public Works and the Aviation departments.

Procurement Information
Invitation for Bid (IFB) 21-FSD-020 was conducted in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10. The Public Works Department received four bids, with an overall
group total determining low bid. The vendor below was the only successful bid to be
deemed responsive and responsible and is being recommended for award.

Empire Southwest, LLC: $23,160

Contract Term
The initial one-year agreement term shall begin on or about Council approval on April
21, 2021, with four option years to be exercised in increments of up to one year, for a
total agreement option term of five years.

Financial Impact
This agreement will have an estimated annual expenditure of $47,000, with a total
aggregate amount of $235,000 over the life of the agreement. Funding is available in
the Aviation and Public Works departments' budgets.




Page 102

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Mario Paniagua and Karen Peters,
and the Aviation and Public Works departments.




Page 103



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Forklifts - Agreement Recommendation (Ordinance S-47474)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Leavitt Machinery USA, Inc., dba Reliable Forklift Sales, Handling Systems, Inc.,
and Octane Forklifts, Inc., for the purchase of various types of forklifts used for
operations. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related
to this item. This item will have an aggregate amount of $1.25 million.

Summary
The Public Works Department has an immediate need to purchase various types of
forklifts for City departments. This equipment will be used to safely move and lift items
from one location to another within a warehouse, maintenance yard, or other facility to
maintain employee safety or prevent damage to materials being moved. Currently, 37
forklifts in the fleet have exceeded their 15-year life cycle. This contract supports the
replacement of aged equipment in Public Works, Police, Fire, Parks and Recreation,
Neighborhood Services, Human Resources, and the City Clerk departments. Over the
next five years, this agreement will also support an additional 24 forklifts estimated to
exceed the 15-year life cycle through the life of the contract.

Procurement Information
Invitation for Bid (IFB) 21-FSD-037 was conducted in accordance with Administrative
Regulation 3.10. The Public Works Department received four bids, with all being
deemed responsive and responsible, with the vendors being recommended for award
based on low bid found in Attachment A.

Contract Term
This agreement will begin on or about Council approval on May 1, 2021 and will have
an initial one-year contract period, with four additional option years to be exercised in
increments of up to one year, for a total contract term of five years.

Financial Impact
This item will have an estimated $250,000 annual expenditure, with a total aggregate
amount of $1.25 million over the life of the contract. Funding is available in various City
departments' budgets.



Page 104

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.




Page 105
ATTACHMENT A
IFB 21-FSD-037 – FORKLIFTS
Recommended vendor noted with an “X”

Vendor

Leavitt Machinery USA, Naumann Hobbs
Bid Item One: Propane Handling Systems,
Inc, dba Reliable Forklift Material Handling Corp Octane Forklifts, Inc.
Forklift Inc.
Sales II, Inc.

4,000 lbs X $23,374.00 X $21,620.00 $30,008.39 $29,138.00
5,000 lbs X $23,994.00 X $22,464.00 $31,692.59 $29,860.00
6,000 lbs X $24,935.00 X $23,932.00 $35,981.27 $29,925.00
7,000 lbs X $26,713.00 X $26,484.00 $38,150.79 $32,786.00
10,000 lbs X $49,332.00 X $41,189.00 $54,583.98 $52,569.00

Bid Item One: Unleaded
Gas/LPG Forklift

4,000 lbs X $23,924.00 X $22,473.00 no bid $29,138.00
5,000 lbs X $24,997.00 X $23,119.00 no bid $29,860.00
6,000 lbs X $25,685.00 X $24,582.00 no bid $29,925.00
7,000 lbs X $27,463.00 X $27,134.00 no bid $32,786.00
10,000 lbs X $49,910.00 X $42,989.00 no bid $52,569.00
Bid Item One: Diesel
Forklift
4,000 lbs X $24,974.00 X $25,553.00 $35,775.00 $27,068.00
5,000 lbs X $25,281.00 X $26,179.00 $37,416.83 $27,724.00
6,000 lbs X $28,834.00 X $28,118.00 $40,291.53 $29,726.00
7,000 lbs X $29,619.00 X $30,582.00 $42,363.92 $32,542.00
10,000 lbs X $52,806.00 X $44,952.00 $59,199.09 $55,913.00
Bid Item Two: Electric
Pallet Truck
2,000 lbs no bid $31,282.00 $18,618.00 X $7,946.00
4,000 lbs no bid $31,563.00 $18,618.00 X $10,414.00
6,000 lbs $14,400.00 no bid $18,618.00 X $11,166.00
Bid Item Three: Narrow
Aisle Forklift
3,200 lbs X $66,540.00 X $62,530.00 $121,011.00 no bid
4,500 lbs X $74,992.00 no bid $121,011.00 no bid
5,500 lbs X $78,850.00 no bid $121,011.00 no bid
Bid Item Four: Walkie
Reach Pallet Truck
2,500 lbs X $24,535.00 no bid $30,636.46 no bid
3,500 lbs no bid X $15,381.00 $30,636.46 no bid
4,500 lbs no bid no bid no bid no bid




Page 106



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Purchase Street Sweepers - COOP 21-071 (Ordinance S-47487)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to use a cooperative
agreement with Balar Holding Corp. dba Balar Equipment Company for the one-time
purchase of seven street sweepers for the Public Works Department. The cooperative
contract was established by the Arizona Department of Transportation under
solicitation number BPM002883. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The total contract amount will not exceed
$2,119,038.

Summary
Street sweepers are purchased in accordance with Particulate Matter (PM-10)
guidelines using Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) funding to reimburse
the City for 94.3 percent of the total cost. By using MAG funding and the State of
Arizona contract, the City will save approximately $1.90 million as a result of the MAG
reimbursement funding program. In addition, the City continually uses street sweepers
as dust inhibitors and for pollution preventive measures. The seven sweepers will
replace sweepers that are currently in Street Transportation Department's fleet and
have reached the end of their useful life cycle or have become too costly to keep in
operation.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, the City is authorized to use
cooperative agreements from other public agencies. The agreement was awarded
through a competitive process consistent with the City's procurement processes, as
set forth in the Phoenix City Code, Chapter 43.

The Arizona Department of Transportation agreement covers the purchase of the
street sweepers as required by the Public Works Department and was awarded on
Oct. 30, 2020. The use of this cooperative agreement will provide the City significant
discounts on these products. Additionally, review of pricing and availability from
registered small and local businesses indicates that this cooperative agreement offers
the best value to the City.




Page 107

Both the American Bar Association and National Institute of Government Purchasing
endorse the use of cooperative agreements by municipalities and other public
institutions. An established best practice in government procurement, cooperative
agreements provide extensive benefits to procurement officials by leveraging volume
purchasing for maximum cost benefit and ensuring best value.

The Deputy Finance Director recommends that use of the cooperative agreement with
Balar Holding Corp. dba Balar Equipment Company be accepted.

Contract Term
This one-time purchase will begin on or about April 7, 2021.

Financial Impact
The total agreement amount will not exceed $2,119,038. Funding is available in the
Street Transportation Department’s budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Public Works
Department.




Page 108



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Downtown Shared Electric Scooter Pilot Program Fee Increases to Ensure Full
Cost Recovery (Ordinance G-6835)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve fee increases
associated with the Downtown Shared Electric Scooter Pilot Program to ensure full
cost recovery.

Summary
On June 26, 2019, City Council unanimously approved the Downtown Shared Electric
Scooter Pilot Program, which allowed shared electric scooter vendors to obtain a
permit to operate within the City of Phoenix. As part of the Pilot Program, City Council
approved Ordinance G-6602, amending the Phoenix City Code to allow shared electric
scooters to operate on public streets. The Ordinance amendment also included
definitions for an electric scooter and authorized the City of Phoenix Police Department
or peace officer to issue civil traffic citations for, among other things, speed limit
violations, yielding the right-of-way, parking violations, and riding on the sidewalk.
Additionally, the Ordinance amendment included a one-year sunset provision, which
effectively would repeal the Code changes on June 25, 2020.

The initial six-month Pilot Program was to end on March 16, 2020. On Feb. 19, 2020,
additional six months and to open the permit application process to allow new vendors
to apply for the Pilot Program. Ordinance G-6676 also amended Ordinance G-6602 to
extend the sunset provision until Dec. 31, 2020. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic,
however, the start of the second six-month pilot program was delayed. To
accommodate this delay, on Dec. 2, 2020, City Council approved Ordinance G-6772,
extending the second six-month Pilot Program through March 31, 2021, and amending
Ordinance G-6602 to extend the Phoenix City Code sunset provision to Dec. 31, 2021.

In October 2020, staff issued permits for the second six-month Pilot Program to two
electric scooter vendors: Razor and Spin. The second six-month Pilot Program
commenced on Oct. 1, 2020, and was scheduled to end on March 31, 2021. On March
17, 2021, City Council approved a 12-month extension of the Downtown Shared
Electric Scooter Pilot Program through March 31, 2022, and an amendment to
Ordinance G-6602 to extend the Phoenix City Code sunset provision to June 30, 2022.


Page 109


Program Fees and Expenses
Vendors have been required to pay a $500 application fee and a $5,000 permit fee to
participate in both six-month phases of the Pilot Program. In total, the City collected
$27,500 in application and permit fees during the 12 months of the Pilot Program. In
addition, vendors are invoiced monthly for a $0.10 surcharge fee per trip and for
parking violations at the rate of $80 per scooter. During the first six-month phase of the
Pilot Program, the City collected a total of $34,788 in surcharge fees and violations,
and anticipates collecting an additional $16,000 during the second six-month phase.
Therefore, the total revenue to the City during the initial 12-month Pilot Program will be
approximately $78,288.

The City contracts with a scooter retrieval company, SWEEP, to monitor, report, and
correct any vendor violations and is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The
contract with SWEEP provides for a per day rate of $271, or approximately $8,100 per
month. This rate is not based on the number of relocated scooters but on service
availability. The total cost for the initial 12-month Pilot Program for SWEEP’s contract
will be approximately $94,203. Streets staff currently provide approximately four hours
of program management efforts per week. The total cost for program management for
the initial 12-month Pilot Program will be approximately $48,000. Therefore, the total
cost to administer the Pilot Program for the first 12 months is estimated at $142,203.

Because the administrative expenses have exceeded the revenues to the City to date,
the Street Transportation Department has been working to ensure the Pilot Program is
cost neutral to the City. In order to ensure the Pilot Program is cost neutral, the
department has prepared to modify the Pilot Program fees by posting the proposed fee
increases for public notice, pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes Section 9-499.15, on
Feb. 1, 2021. The proposed fee increases are a $500 application fee (unchanged); a
six-month permit fee not to exceed $7,500 (increase of $2,500); a surcharge fee per
trip not to exceed $0.25 (increase of $0.15); and a relocation parking fee not to exceed
$100 per scooter (increase of $20). The Street Transportation Department is
evaluating potential contract modifications for scooter retrieval services and working
with the two current vendors to set the appropriate fees within these limits to ensure
the Pilot Program is cost neutral.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Aviation and Transportation Subcommittee:
· Recommended approval of the initial Pilot Program on Jan. 22, 2019, by a vote of 3
-0; and
· Reviewed this item on June 25, 2019.



Page 110


The Transportation, Infrastructure and Innovation Subcommittee:
· Was provided with a three-month update on the Pilot Program on Jan. 7, 2020;
· Recommended approval of the Pilot Program extension on Feb. 5, 2020, by a vote
of 4-0;
· Was provided with an update on the Pilot Program extension on Feb. 3, 2021, and
requested the item be brought back to the March 3, 2021, meeting; and
· Was provided with an update on the second six-month extension and
recommended approval of a twelve-month extension on March 3, 2021, by a
vote of 4-0.

The Planning and Economic Development Subcommittee:
· Was provided information on the initial Pilot Program on Feb. 5, 2019; and
· Received an update for information and discussion on June 4, 2019.

The Workforce and Economic Development Subcommittee:
· Was provided a report with a summary of the second six-month extension on Feb.
24, 2021 and presented on March 24, 2021.

The City Council approved:
· The Pilot Program (Ordinance G-6602) on June 26, 2019;
· A Pilot Program extension (Ordinance G-6676) on Feb. 19, 2020;
· A Sunset Provision extension (Ordinance G-6772) on Dec. 2, 2020; and
· A Pilot Program extension and a Sunset Provision extension (Ordinance G-6823)
on March 17, 2021.

Public Outreach
The proposed fee increases were posted on phoenix.gov at least 60 days prior to this
meeting in compliance with Arizona law. The schedule and written report or data
supporting the increased fees is filed in the City Clerk Department. Also, as required by
state law, a notice of intent to establish the proposed fee increases was posted on
phoenix.gov at least 15 days prior to this meeting and was distributed through the
City's social media accounts.

Location
The main boundaries of the Pilot Program are from 7th Avenue to 7th Street and from
Buckeye to McDowell roads. The Pilot Program boundary includes an extension of the
area bounded by Roosevelt Street and Grand Avenue, and a reduction of the northern
boundary to Portland Street between 7th and Central avenues.
Council Districts: 4, 7 and 8


Page 111


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 112



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Section 36-158, Schedule I, Local Speed Limits at 19
Locations (Ordinance G-6839)

Request to amend Phoenix City Code, section 36-158, Schedule I, Local Speed Limits
at 19 locations due to record keeping and local speed limit changes.

Summary
Speed limits are established under Arizona Revised Statutes, section 28-703, which
requires an "engineering study and traffic investigation." The Phoenix City Code and
Charter require that all local speed limits on City streets be approved by City Council in
the form of an amendment to Phoenix City Code (Attachment A).

The Street Transportation Department (Streets) is recommending record keeping and
local speed limit changes at the 19 locations summarized in (Attachment B). Streets
staff has conducted a comprehensive review of the speed limit ordinance and has
noted locations where speed limits posted on City streets do not match the speed
limits included in the current ordinance. In addition to these record keeping changes,
there are streets or street segments that are being removed from the ordinance as
they are either private or no longer part of the City's street network. Only one change
is related to the construction of a street that warrants a speed limit change. As with all
recommended speed limit changes, they are based on traffic investigations conducted
with the engineering judgment of Streets staff.

Streets actively and regularly reviews posted speed limits and reconciles any
discrepancies with the ordinance. Field reviews are typically conducted by the Streets
Traffic Services Investigations team, but most recently this effort has been supported
by the Universal Right-of-Way Inspections team. Field reviews over the last year have
been completed for over 700 street segments. This update includes findings and
corrections from approximately half of the reviews conducted, with the remainder
anticipated for completion by October 2021.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Innovation Subcommittee recommended
approval of this item on April 7, 2021, by a vote of 4-0.



Page 113

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Street
Transportation Department.




Page 114
ATTACHMENT A
ARTICLE XII. PENALTY AND SCHEDULES

36-158 Schedule I—Local speed limits.

It is hereby determined upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed limit
permitted by state law on the following streets or intersections is greater or less than is reasonable
under existing conditions, and it is hereby declared that the maximum speed limits shall be as
hereinafter set forth on those streets, parts of streets or intersections herein designated at the times
specified when signs are erected giving notice thereof.

The City Traffic Engineer may declare a maximum speed limit that is determined pursuant to this section
to be effective at all times or at such times as indicated on the speed limit signs. The City Traffic
Engineer may establish lower speed limits for different times of day, different types of vehicles, varying
weather conditions, special events, work zones for construction, maintenance or other activity in the
roadway and other factors bearing on safe speeds. The lower limits are effective when posted on
appropriate fixed, variable or portable signs.

Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Acoma Drive 51st Avenue to 43rd Avenue

Acoma Drive Black Canyon Freeway to 23rd Avenue

Acoma Drive 36th Street to 40th Street

Acoma Drive Tatum Boulevard to 64th Street

Air Lane 1,240 Feet East of 32nd Street to 750 Feet East of 36th Street

Arroyo Norte Drive Northbound I-17 Frontage Road to 3900 West

Beardsley Road 20th Street to Cave Creek Road

Beardsley Road 32nd Street to 34th Street

Butler Drive 39th Avenue to 27th Avenue

Butler Drive Black Canyon Freeway to 19th Avenue

Campbell Avenue 71st Avenue to 51st Avenue




Page 115
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Campbell Avenue 113th Avenue to 107th Avenue

Campbell Avenue 35th Avenue to 15th Avenue

Campbell Avenue 12th Street to 16th Street

Campbell Avenue 20th Street to 44th Street

Canterbury Drive Thunderbird Road to Tam-O-Shanter Drive

Cashman Drive Pinnacle Peak Road to 44th Street

Central Avenue Lincoln Street to Roosevelt Street

CENTRAL AVENUE LINCOLN STREET TO MADISON STREET

Central Avenue Grovers Avenue to Union Hills Drive

Chauncey Lane 68th Street to Scottsdale Road

Cholla Street 24th Street to 56th Street

Clarendon Avenue 55th Avenue to Maryvale Parkway

Colter Street 16th Street to SR-51

Copperhead Trail North Valley Parkway to Gambit Trail

Copperhead Trail West of 14th Lane Traffic Circle to Gambit Trail

Coral Gables Drive Thunderbird Road to 7th Street

Deer Valley Drive 0.5 Miles East of 7th Street to Cave Creek Road

Desert Willow Parkway East Dixileta Drive to Dynamite Boulevard

Desert Willow Parkway 30200 North Cave Creek Road to 31000 North Cave Creek Road
West

Dove Valley Road 52nd Place to 56th Street




Page 116
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Dunlap Avenue 7th Street to 12th Street

Durango Street 67th Avenue to 63rd Avenue

Elwood Street 40th Street to 48th Street

Encanto Boulevard 93rd Avenue to 91st Avenue

Encanto Boulevard 75th Avenue to 73rd Avenue

Encanto Boulevard 71st Avenue to 51st Avenue

Encanto Boulevard 49th Avenue to 31st Avenue

Encanto Boulevard Grand Avenue to 19th Avenue

Freemont Road Rough Rider Road to Cashman Drive

Galvin Parkway 100 Feet +/- North of East Papago Park to Traffic Circle at Botanical
Garden Entrance

Greenway Road 20th Street to Cave Creek Road

Grovers Avenue 51st Avenue to 27th Avenue

Grovers Avenue Central Avenue to Cave Creek Road

Hatcher Road Central Avenue to 12th Street

Highland Avenue Campbell Avenue to 107th Avenue

Highland Avenue 16th Street to 24th Street

Illini Street 30th Street to Riverpoint Parkway

Jefferson Street 27th Avenue to 23rd Avenue

Jefferson Street 7th Avenue to 4th Avenue

Jefferson Street 4th Street to 7th Street




Page 117
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Jesse Owens Parkway Central Avenue to 7th Street

Jones Avenue 103rd Avenue to 99th Avenue

Kelton Lane 29th Avenue to 28th Avenue

Knox Road Warpaint Drive to 36th Street

Lakewood Parkway West 3300 East to 3600 East to 17000 South to 15800 South

Lakewood Parkway East 3600 East to 3800 East to 17000 South to 15800 South

Lindner Drive (West 45th Avenue to Augusta North
Section)

Lindner Drive (East 45th Avenue to Grovers Avenue
Section)

Lockwood Drive Freemont Road to Cashman Drive

Marriott Drive Pathfinder Drive to Deer Valley Drive

Maryland Avenue 43rd Avenue to Black Canyon Freeway

Maryvale Parkway 51st Avenue to Indian School Road

Mayo Boulevard Black Mountain Boulevard to 40th Street

Missouri Avenue 43rd Avenue to 27th Avenue

Missouri Avenue Black Canyon Freeway to 19th Avenue

Mohave Street 7th Avenue to 7th Street

Morningside Drive Black Canyon Freeway to 21st Avenue

MORTEN AVENUE 16th Street to 1900 East

Mountain View Road 23rd Avenue to 15th Avenue




Page 118
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Mountain View Road 12th Street to 17th Street

Mountain View Road 32nd Street to 36th Street

Northern Avenue 26th Street to 32nd Street

North Valley Parkway Carefree Highway to 33rd Lane

Oak Street 16th Street to 24th Street

Oak Street 32nd Street to 44th Street

Oak Street 48th Street to 52nd Street

Oak Street (Eastbound) 56th Street to 64th Street

Olympic Drive Central Avenue to Jesse Owens Parkway

Orangewood Avenue 43rd Avenue to 19th Avenue

Osborn Road 83rd Avenue to 75th Avenue

Osborn Road 73rd Avenue to Grand Avenue

Osborn Road Black Canyon Freeway to 19th Avenue

Osborn Road 40th Street to 56th Street

Paradise Lane 7th Street to 16th Street

Paradise Lane Tatum Boulevard to 56th Street

Paradise Lane 47th Avenue to 43rd Avenue

Pathfinder Drive 44th Street to Marriott Drive

Piedmont Road 48th Street to 51st Street

Pinnacle Vista Drive Pyramid Peak Parkway to Inspiration Mountain Parkway




Page 119
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Pinnacle Vista Drive 52nd Street to 56th Street

Quail Track Drive North Valley Parkway to Copperhead Trail

Ranger Drive Tatum Boulevard to 55th Street

Riverpoint Parkway Wood Street to Illini Street

Roeser Road 7th Avenue to Central Avenue

Roeser Road 40th Street to 48th Street

Roosevelt Street 51st Avenue to 43rd Avenue

Roosevelt Street 39th Avenue to 35th Avenue

Roosevelt Street 33rd Avenue to 27th Avenue

Roosevelt Street 19th Avenue to 16th Street

Rose Garden Lane 29th Avenue to 19th Avenue

Rough Rider Road Aviano Way to 40th Street

Sells Drive 79th Drive to 71st Drive

SKY CROSSING WAY DEER VALLEY ROAD TO 33RD STREET

Squaw Peak Drive Lincoln Drive to Squaw Peak Park Boundary

SR-51 (East Access Road) 500 Feet North of Camelback Road to Colter Street

Stanford Drive 40th Street to 44th Street

Stetson Hills Loop 43rd Avenue to 39th Drive

Sweetwater Avenue 51st Avenue to Black Canyon Freeway

Sweetwater Avenue 32nd Street to 42nd Street




Page 120
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Sweetwater Avenue Paradise Valley Parkway East to Scottsdale Road

Thunderbird Road 28th Street to 32nd Street

Trailblazer Drive 44th Street to Tatum Boulevard

University Drive 24th Street to Magnolia Street (2700 East)

Utopia Road 23rd Avenue to 19th Avenue

Van Buren Street 7th Street to 16th Street

Via Del Deserto 33rd Lane to Via Puzzola

Via Puzzola Carefree Highway to Cloud Road

Via Tramonto Carefree Highway to Via Vista

Via Vista 27th Avenue to Via Tramonto

Vineyard Road 47th Avenue to 43rd Avenue

Virginia Avenue 35th Avenue to 27th Avenue

Virginia Avenue Central Avenue to 12th Street

Warpaint Drive Knox Road to Coconino Street

Washington Street 7th Avenue to 4th Avenue

Washington Street 4th Street to 7th Street

Wier Avenue 39th Avenue to 35th Avenue

Winchcomb Drive 26th Avenue to Acoma Drive (2300 West)

Wood Street Riverpoint Parkway to University Drive

1st Avenue Grant Street to Roosevelt Street




Page 121
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

3rd Avenue Van Buren Street To McDowell Road

3rd Avenue Thomas Road to Osborn Road

3rd Street Monroe Street to Fillmore Street

5th Avenue Van Buren Street To McDowell Road

5th Street Van Buren Street to 5th Street Crossover

5th Street Crossover 5th Street to Fillmore Street

7th Avenue Jackson Street to Van Buren Street

7th Avenue Coral Gables Drive to Greenway Parkway

7th Street Jefferson Street to Van Buren Street

11th Avenue Greenway Parkway to Bell Road

11th Street Washington Street to Moreland Street

12th Street Vineyard Road to Southern Avenue

12th Street Moreland Street to Thomas Road

12th Street Osborn Road to Indian School Road

12th Street Bell Road to Agua Fria Freeway

15th Avenue Harrison Street to Van Buren Street

15th Avenue Bethany Home Road to Northern Avenue

15th Avenue Hatcher Road to Shangri-La Road

15th Avenue Bell Road to Grovers Avenue

15th Avenue Union Hills Drive to Utopia Road




Page 122
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

16th Street Grovers Avenue to Beardsley Road

18th Street Camelback Road to 500 Feet North of Camelback Road

20th Street Dobbins Road to Baseline Road

20th Street Roeser Road to Broadway Road

20th Street Jefferson Street to Roosevelt Street

20th Street McDowell Road to Cambridge Avenue

20th Street Indian School Road to Highland Avenue

20th Street Missouri Avenue to Bethany Home Road

21st Avenue Bell Road to Union Hills Drive

23rd Avenue Indian School Road to Bethany Home Road

23rd Avenue Orangewood Avenue to Dunlap Avenue

23rd Avenue Acoma Drive to Greenway Road

23rd Avenue Union Hills Drive to Utopia Road

24th Street Shea Boulevard to Sweetwater Avenue

26th Avenue Thunderbird Road to Acoma Drive

26th Street SR-51 to Shea Boulevard

27th Avenue Rose Garden Lane to Deer Valley Drive

27th Drive Carefree Highway to Via Vista

28th Street Cholla Street to Thunderbird Road

28th Street Oak Street to Camelback Road




Page 123
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

28th Avenue 29th Avenue to Kelton Lane

29th Avenue Union Hills Drive to Kristal Way

29th Avenue Beardsley Road to Rose Garden Lane

31st Avenue Van Buren Street to Encanto Boulevard

31st Avenue Thomas Road to Grand Avenue

31st Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road

31st Avenue Missouri Avenue to Orangewood Avenue

31st Avenue Northern Avenue to Dunlap Avenue

31st Avenue Cheryl Drive to Thunderbird Road

31st Avenue Bell Road to Kristal Way

31st Avenue Yorkshire Drive to Beardsley Road

32nd Street 750 Feet South of Beautiful Lane to Baseline Road

32nd Street Deer valley Road to Sky Crossing Way

32nd Street Puget Avenue to Mountain View Road

33rd Lane North Valley Parkway to Via Del Deserto

35th Avenue Happy Valley Road to 800 Feet North of Hackamore Drive

36th Street Ranch Circle North to Suncrest Court

36th Street Roeser Road to Broadway Road

36th Street McDowell Road to Camelback Road

36th Street Mountain View Road to Shea Boulevard




Page 124
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

36th Street Cactus Road to Greenway Road

39th Avenue Van Buren Street to Osborn Road

39th Avenue Missouri Avenue to Camino Acequia

39th Avenue Peoria Avenue to Cactus Road

39th Avenue Bell Road to Yorkshire Drive

40th Street University Drive to 0.25 Miles North of University Drive

40th Street Mountain View Road to Shea Boulevard

44th Street Frye Road to Chandler Boulevard

44th Street Ray Road to Warner-Elliot Loop

44th Street Paradise Village Parkway North to Bell Road

44th Street Deer Valley Drive to Cashman Drive

45th Avenue Bell Road to Union Hills Drive

46th Street Paradise Village Parkway North to Thunderbird Road

47th Avenue Baseline Road to Vineyard Road

47th Avenue Thomas Road to Camelback Road

47th Avenue Thunderbird Road to Greenway Road

47th Avenue Acoma Drive to Bell Road

48th Street Pecos Park Entrance to Frye Road

48th Street Elwood Street to University Drive

48th Street Van Buren Street to McDowell Road




Page 125
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

48th Street Cholla Street to Paradise Village Parkway South

50th Street Frye Road to Chandler Boulevard

51st Street Elliot Road to Piedmont Road

52nd Place Rancho Paloma Drive to Dove Valley Road

52nd Street Thomas Road to Osborn Road

52nd Street Cholla Street to Cactus Road

52nd Street Thunderbird Road to Bell Road

52nd Street Jomax Road to Pinnacle Vista Drive

53rd Avenue Maryvale Parkway to Indian School Road

55th Avenue McDowell Road to Camelback Road

55th Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Alameda Road

56th Street Camelback Road to Rockridge Road

56th Street Mountain View Road to Shea Boulevard

59th Avenue South Mountain Avenue To Baseline Road

60th Street Desert Cove Avenue to Cholla Street Alignment

60th Street Cactus Road to Bell Road

63rd Avenue Lower Buckeye Road to Pima Street

63rd Avenue Thomas Road to Osborn Road

63rd Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road

70th Street Princess Drive to Mayo Boulevard




Page 126
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

71st Avenue Van Buren Street to Roosevelt Street

71st Avenue McDowell Road to Indian School Road

71st Avenue Campbell Avenue to Camelback Road

71st Drive Indian School Road to Sells Drive

79th Drive Osborn Road to Sells Drive

80th Lane Thomas Road to Osborn Road

93rd Avenue Encanto Boulevard to Thomas Road

103rd Avenue Broadway Road to Country Place Boulevard

103rd Avenue Indian School Road to Campbell Avenue

111th Avenue Campbell Avenue to Camelback Road




Table A1. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on School Days.

Cactus road Wb 350 ft +/- east of 37th Avenue and eb 350 ft +/- west of 37th Avenue

Ray Road 400 Feet North of Thunderhill Drive to 100 Feet South of Mountain Sky
Avenue

19th Avenue 450 Feet North of Orangewood Avenue to 450 Feet South of Orangewood
Avenue




Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Adams Street 27th Avenue to Washington Street

Air Lane 32nd Street to 1,240 Feet East of 32nd Street

Air Lane 750 Feet East of 36th Street to 40th Street




Page 127
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Anthem Way 46th Drive to Black Canyon Freeway

BEARDSLEY ROAD 20TH STREET TO CAVE CREEK ROAD

Bethany Home Road 16th Street to 18th Street

Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Madison Street to Van Buren Street
Road

Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Interstate 17 Milepost No. 213.34 (North of Bell Road) to Bell
Road (Southbound) Road

Black Mountain Boulevard Sr101 To Mayo Boulevard

Black Mountain Boulevard Deer Valley Road to Rough Rider Road

Black Mountain Boulevard Rancho Paloma Drive to Carefree Highway

Buckeye Road 31st Avenue to 27th Street

Camelback Road 27th Avenue to 28th Street

Carefree Highway 3900 West to 700 Feet East of 33rd Avenue

Central Avenue Briarwood Terrace to Chandler Boulevard

Central Avenue Mineral Road to Thunderbird Trail

Central Avenue (Southbound) Thunderbird Trail to Dobbins Road

Central Avenue Vineyard Road to Pioneer Street

Central Avenue Watkins Street to Lincoln Street

Central Avenue Roosevelt Street to Mountain View Road

Central Avenue Happy Valley Road to 2,050 Feet +/- North of Happy Valley
Road

Chandler Boulevard Shaughnessey Road To 19th Avenue




Page 128
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Chandler Boulevard (Westbound) 19th Avenue to 15th Avenue

Chandler Boulevard Pecos Road to Shaughnessey Road

Cheryl Drive 35th Avenue to Metro Parkway West

Circle Mountain Road New River Road to Barko Lane

Cotton Center Boulevard 40th Street to 48th Street

Deer Valley Drive 1,200 Feet West of 35th Avenue to 35th Avenue

Desert Foothills Parkway Chandler Boulevard to 5th Avenue

Desert Willow Parkway East 31000 North Cave Creek Road (East Side) to 5000 East
Dixileta Drive

Dobbins Road Central Avenue to 16th Street

Dove Valley Road North Valley Parkway to 16th Avenue

Dunlap Avenue 7th Avenue to 7th Street

Encanto Boulevard 83rd Avenue to 75th Avenue

Frye Road 3rd Street to Desert Foothills Parkway

Galvin Parkway North of Traffic Circle at Botanical Garden Entry to McDowell
Road

Grand Avenue 19th Avenue to 7th Avenue

Grant Street Black Canyon Freeway to Lincoln Street

Grant Street 16th Street to Sky Harbor Circle

Greenway Road Cave Creek Road to Greenway Parkway

Guadalupe Road 48th Street to Interstate 10




Page 129
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Happy Valley Road (Eastbound) 29th Avenue to I-17

HAPPY VALLEY ROAD 29TH AVENUE TO 23RD AVENUE

Hatcher Road 19th Avenue to Central Avenue

Hess Street 24th Street to 26th Street

Holmes Boulevard Bell Road to Grovers Avenue

Indian School Road 27th Avenue to 20th Street

Indian School Road 45th Street to 48th Street

Jefferson Street 23rd Avenue to 7th Avenue

Jefferson Street 7th Street to Washington Street

Jefferson Street 7th Street to 265 Feet +/- East of 26th Street (except
frontage road which is 25 mph)

Jomax Road Cave Creek Road to Tatum Boulevard

Jomax Road Tatum Boulevard to 52nd Street

Knox Road 36th Street to 48th Street

Lafayette Boulevard 44th Street to 64th Street

Liberty Lane 17th Avenue to Central Avenue

Liberty Lane Desert Foothills Parkway to 13th Way

Lincoln Street Grant Street to 7th Street

Lone Mountain Road 40th Street to Cave Creek Road

Lower Buckeye Road 300 Feet West to 300 Feet East of 99th Avenue

Lower Buckeye Road 22nd Avenue to 19th Avenue




Page 130
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Maryland Avenue 19th Avenue to 16th Street

Maryvale Parkway Indian School Road to 51st Avenue

McDowell Road 27th Avenue to 32nd Street

Metro Parkway Entire Street Surrounding Metro Center

Missouri Avenue 19th Avenue to 24th Street

Mohave Street 7th Street to Sky Harbor Circle

Mohave Street 22nd Street to 24th Street

Mountain View Road Central Avenue to 12th Street

Norterra Parkway Happy Valley Road to Jomax Road

Oak Street 24th Street to 32nd Street

Oak Street 52nd Street to 56th Street

Old Tower Road 26th Street to 32nd Street

Osborn Road 19th Avenue to 36th Street

Paloma Parkway Bronco Butte Trail to Dove Valley Road

Paradise Village Parkway Entire Street Surrounding Paradise Village

Peoria Avenue 19th Avenue to 7th Avenue

Pinnacle Peak Road 19th Avenue to 7th Street

Pointe Golf Club Drive Thunderbird Road to Friess Drive

POINTE GOLF CLUB DRIVE THUNDERBIRD ROAD TO SHARON DRIVE

Princess Drive 68th Street to Scottsdale Road




Page 131
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Pyramid Peak Parkway 1,900 Feet +/- north of Brookhart Way to City Limits
(Northbound)

Ranch Circle North Ray Road (3600 East) to Ray Road (4300 East)

Ranch Circle South Ray Road to Mountain Parkway

Rancho Paloma Drive Black Mountain Boulevard to 56th Street

Roeser Road Central Avenue to 40th Street

Roosevelt Street 59th Avenue to 51st Avenue

Roosevelt Street 16th Street to 32nd Street

Rose Garden Lane 19th Avenue to 7th Avenue

Shea Boulevard 24th Street to 32nd Street

Sky Harbor Circle 22nd Street to Grant Street, Mohave Street to Grant Street,
and Mohave Street to 22nd Street

Southern Avenue 7th Avenue to 7th Street

Sweetwater Avenue Cave Creek Road to 32nd Street

Tatum Boulevard 40th Street to Cave Creek Road

Thistle Landing Drive 48th Street to 50th Street

Thomas Road 27th Avenue to 32nd Street

Thunderbird Road 32nd Street to 38th Place

Tombstone Trail Norterra Parkway to 21st Avenue

University Drive 16th Street to 24th Street

Utopia Road Black Canyon Freeway to 23rd Avenue




Page 132
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Utopia Road Cave Creek Road to 32nd Street

Van Buren Street 35th Avenue to 7th Avenue

Van Buren Street 16th Street to 44th Street

Washington Street Adams Street to 7th Avenue

Washington Street 7th Street to 24th Street

Washington Street 7th Street to 24th Street (except frontage road which is 25
mph)

Williams Drive Black Canyon Freeway to 19th Avenue

Yorkshire Drive 43rd Avenue to Black Canyon Freeway

1st Avenue Crossover Grant Street to Hadley Street

3rd Avenue Osborn Road to Indian School Road

3rd Street Frye Road to Chandler Boulevard

3rd Street Fillmore Street to Indian School Road

4th Street 5th Street Crossover to Roosevelt Street

5th Avenue Desert Foothills Parkway to Chandler Boulevard

5th Street Crossover Fillmore Street to 4th Street

7th Avenue Dobbins Road to Baseline Road

7th Avenue Magnolia Street to Jackson Street

7th Avenue Van Buren Street to Missouri Avenue

7th Avenue Dunlap Avenue to Hatcher Road

7th Avenue Cinnabar Avenue to Peoria Avenue




Page 133
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

7th Avenue Greenway Parkway to Bell Road

7th Street Mineral Road to Baseline Road

7th Street Lincoln Street to Jefferson Street

7th Street Van Buren Street to Missouri Avenue

7th Street Butler Drive to Cinnabar Avenue

12th Street Indian School Road to Mountain View Road

15th Avenue Southern Avenue to Broadway Road

15th Avenue 0.25 miles South of Magnolia Street to Harrison Street

15th Avenue Van Buren Street to Bethany Home Road

16th Street Dobbins Road to Baseline Road

16th Street Maricopa Freeway to Bethany Home Road

16th Street Bell Road to Grovers Avenue

17th Avenue Pecos Road to Chandler Boulevard

17th Avenue Buckeye Road to Grant Street

19th Avenue Buckeye Road to the Grand Canal

19th Avenue Glendale Avenue to Northern Avenue (Except where noted
in subsection A.1 of this section)

20th Street Greenfield Road to Indian School Road

20th Street Highland Avenue to Missouri Avenue

21st Avenue Jomax Road to Tombstone Trail

23rd Avenue Bethany Home Road to Glendale Avenue




Page 134
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

23rd Avenue Mountain View Road to Cactus Road

23rd Avenue Utopia Road to Deer Valley Drive

23rd Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road

24th Street South Mountain Avenue to Baseline Road

24th Street Buckeye Road to Indian School Road

25th Avenue Dunlap Avenue to Peoria Avenue

26th Street Old Tower Road to Hess Street

27th Avenue South Mountain Avenue to Baseline Road

27th Avenue Lower Buckeye Road to Van Buren Street

27th Avenue Northern Avenue to Dunlap Avenue

27th Avenue Grovers Avenue to Union Hills Drive

27th Avenue Yorkshire Drive to Rose Garden Lane

27th Drive North Valley Parkway to Carefree Highway

28th Drive Peoria Avenue to Cactus Road

29th Avenue Dunlap Avenue to Metro Parkway

29th Avenue Greenway Road to Bell Road

32nd Street Air Lane to Van Buren Street

32nd Street Chandler Boulevard to Pecos Road

35th Avenue South Mountain Avenue to Baseline Road

35th Avenue Van Buren Street to Encanto Boulevard




Page 135
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

36th Street Shea Boulevard to Cactus Road

39th Drive Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road

40th Street 0.39 miles South of Air Lane to Washington Street

40th Street McDowell Road to Missouri Avenue

40th Street (Southbound) Shea Boulevard to Mercer Lane

40th Street Potter Drive to Deer Valley Drive

40th Street Tatum Boulevard to Lone Mountain Road

43rd Avenue Olney Avenue to Dobbins Road

43rd Avenue Elwood Street Alignment to Lower Buckeye Road

43rd Avenue Anthem Way to 1,930 Feet North of Anthem Way

44th Street Campbell Avenue to Calle Feliz

44th Place Cotton Center Boulevard to Broadway Road

48th Street Frye Road to Chandler Boulevard

48th Street Washington Street to Van Buren Street

48th Street Piedmont Road to Guadalupe Road

50th Street Chandler Boulevard to Ray Road

51st Street 500 Feet South of Elliot Road to Warner-Elliot Loop

52nd Street McDowell Road to Thomas Road

52nd Street Cactus Road to Thunderbird Road

55th Avenue Alameda Road to Happy Valley Road




Page 136
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

56th Street South City Limit to Van Buren Street

56th Street Oak Street to Camelback Road

56th Street Bell Road to Central Arizona Project Canal

56th Street Lone Mountain Road to Rancho Paloma Drive

64th Street Oak Street to McDowell Road (Southbound Only)

64th Street 255 Feet North of Hillcrest Boulevard to Chaparral Road

68th Street Princess Drive to Mayo Boulevard

71st Avenue Baseline Road to Vineyard Road

107th Avenue Camelback Road to Missouri Avenue




Table B1. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on School Days.

Dunlap Avenue For Westbound, 650 Feet +/- West of 29th Avenue to 625 +/- West of
35th Avenue

Dunlap Avenue For Eastbound, 545 Feet +/- West of 35th Avenue to 30th Avenue




Table B2. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on School Days.

Greenway Parkway 400 Feet West of 7th Avenue to 250 Feet East of 5th Avenue




Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Air Lane 24th Street to 32nd Street

Baseline Road 51st Avenue to 35th Avenue




Page 137
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Baseline Road 7th Avenue to 7th Street

Beardsley Road (Eastbound 37th Avenue to 27th Avenue
Frontage)

Beardsley Road Cave Creek Road to 32nd Street

Bell Road 19th Avenue to 12th Street

Bell Road 0.25 miles West of Cave Creek Road to 1,500 Feet East of
40th Street

Bethany Home Road 43rd Avenue to 16th Street

Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Maricopa Freeway to Madison Street
Roads

Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Thomas Road to Cactus Road
Road (Northbound)

Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Bell Road to Union Hills Drive
Road (Northbound)

Black Canyon Freeway Frontage Mountain View Road (Alignment) to Thomas Road
Road (Southbound)

Black Mountain Boulevard Mayo Boulevard to Deer Valley Road

Black Mountain Boulevard Rough Rider Road to Pinnacle Peak Road

BLACK MOUNTAIN BOULEVARD MAYO BOULEVARD TO PINNACLE PEAK ROAD

Broadway Road 19th Avenue to 32nd Street

Buckeye Road 39th Avenue to 31st Avenue

Cactus road 39th avenue to 350 ft west of 37th ave

Cactus road 350 ft east of 37th ave to 19th ave




Page 138
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Cactus Road Cave Creek Road to 60th Street

Camelback Road 43rd Avenue to 27th Avenue

Camelback Road 28th Street to 64th Street

Cave Creek Road Dunlap Avenue to Peoria Avenue

Cave Creek Road Marco Polo Road to Rose Garden Lane

Central Avenue (Northbound) Thunderbird Trail to Dobbins Road

Central Avenue Dobbins Road to Vineyard Road

Central Avenue Pioneer Street to Watkins Street

Chandler Boulevard Marketplace Way to 34th Street

Deer Valley Drive 600 Feet West of 27th Avenue to 0.25 Miles East of 19th
Avenue

Deer Valley Drive 600 Feet West of 16th Street to 56th Street

Desert Foothills Parkway Pecos Road to Chandler Boulevard

Desert Peak Parkway Lieber Place to Cave Creek Road

Dobbins Road From West City Limit to 1,320 Feet +/- East

Dobbins Road 23rd Avenue to Central Avenue

Dunlap Avenue 43rd Avenue to 7th Avenue (Except where noted in Table B1
of this section)

Durango Street 35th Avenue to Black Canyon Freeway

Elliot Road 2,085 Feet +/- West of 59th Avenue to 51st Avenue

Elliot Road 46th Street to 51st Street




Page 139
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Elwood Street 7th Street to 16th Street

Galvin Parkway Van Buren Street to 100 Feet +/- North of East Papago Park
(Zoo Entrance)

Gavilan Peak Parkway 800 Feet +/- West of 33rd Lane to Cloud Road

Glendale Avenue 43rd Avenue to 21st Street

Grand Avenue 21st Avenue to 19th Avenue

Greenway Parkway 500 Feet West of 7th Avenue to 3rd Avenue (Except where
noted in Table B2 of this section)

Greenway Parkway Cave Creek Road to Greenway Road

Greenway Road 51st Avenue to 19th Avenue

Greenway Road Greenway Parkway to 300 Feet East of 30th Street

Greenway Road 52nd Street to 500 Feet East of 60th Street

Happy Valley Road 35th Avenue to Black Canyon Freeway

Indian School Road 67th Avenue to 27th Avenue

Indian School Road 20th Street to 45th Street

Indian School Road 48th Street to 60th Street

Jomax Road Black Canyon Freeway to Norterra Parkway

Liberty Lane 13th Way to 24th Street

Lincoln Drive 21st Street to 800 Feet East of Ocotillo Road

Lower Buckeye Road 103rd Avenue to 300 Feet +/- West of 99th Avenue

Lower Buckeye Road 300 Feet +/- East of 99th Avenue to 95th Avenue




Page 140
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Lower Buckeye Road 27th Avenue to 22nd Avenue

Maricopa Freeway Frontage Roads 23rd Avenue to 16th Street

MAYO BOULEVARD BLACK MOUNTAIN BOULEVARD TO 40TH STREET

McDowell Road 43rd Avenue to 27th Avenue

McDowell Road 32nd Street to 52nd Street

Mountain Parkway Chandler Boulevard to Ray Road

Norterra Parkway Jomax Road to North Valley Parkway

Northern Avenue 43rd Avenue to SR-51

North Valley Parkway Jomax Road to 30th Avenue

North Valley Parkway 800 Feet +/- West of 33rd Lane to 33rd Lane

Peoria Avenue 43rd Avenue to 19th Avenue

Pyramid Peak Parkway 67th Avenue to City Limits
(Southbound)

Pyramid Peak Parkway 67th Avenue to 1,900 Feet +/- North of Brookhart Way
(Northbound)

Ray Road Chandler Boulevard to Interstate 10 (Except where noted in
Table A1 of this section)

Rose Garden Lane Cave Creek Road to 32nd Street

Shea Boulevard 32nd Street to 450 Feet East of 40th Street

Southern Avenue 39th Avenue to 31st Avenue

Southern Avenue 19th Avenue to 7th Avenue

Southern Avenue 7th Street to 24th Street




Page 141
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Thomas Road 800 Feet West of 59th Avenue to Grand Avenue

Thomas Road 32nd Street to 56th Street

Thunderbird Road 31st Avenue to Coral Gables Drive

Thunderbird Road 38th Place to Scottsdale Road

Union Hills Drive 27th Avenue to 19th Avenue

Union Hills Drive 7th Street to 20th Street

University Drive Wood Street to 48th Street

Van Buren Street 67th Avenue to 200 Feet West of 63rd Avenue

Van Buren Street 39th Avenue to 35th Avenue

Van Buren Street 44th Street to 56th Street

Warner-Elliot Loop 4600 East Elliot Road to 578 Feet East of Wakial Loop

Washington Street 24th Street to 34th Street

7th Avenue Baseline Road to Magnolia Street

7th Avenue Missouri Avenue to Dunlap Avenue

7th Avenue Bell Road to Union Hills Drive

7th Avenue Rose Garden Lane to Deer Valley Drive

7th Street Baseline Road to Lincoln Street

7th Street Missouri Avenue to Butler Drive

7th Street Cinnabar Avenue to 400 Feet North of Peoria Avenue

7th Street Thunderbird Road to 600 Feet North of Bell Road




Page 142
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

16th Street Baseline Road to the Maricopa Freeway

16th Street Bethany Home Road to Northern Avenue

19th Avenue Southern Avenue to Buckeye Road

19th Avenue Grand Canal to Glendale Avenue

19th Avenue Northern Avenue to Evans Drive

24th Street Pecos Road to Chandler Boulevard

24th Street Baseline Road to Buckeye Road

24th Street Indian School Road to Montebello Avenue

27th Avenue Baseline Road to 500 Feet +/- North

27th Avenue Van Buren Street to Northern Avenue

32nd Street Baseline Road to Wood Street

32nd Street Van Buren Street to the Arizona Canal

32nd Street Mountain View Road to Bell Road

32nd Street Beardsley Road to Rose Garden Lane

35th Avenue Dobbins Road to South Mountain Avenue

35th Avenue Baseline Road to Broadway Road

35th Avenue Lower Buckeye Road to Van Buren Street

35th Avenue Encanto Boulevard to Bell Road

35th Avenue Union Hills Drive to Beardsley Road

40th Street Pecos Road to Chandler Boulevard




Page 143
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

40th Street 800 Feet South of Roeser Road to University Drive

40th Street Washington Street to McDowell Road

40th Street (Northbound) Shea Boulevard to Mercer Lane

40th Street Mercer Lane to Union Hills Drive

40th Street Deer Valley Drive to Pinnacle Peak Road

43rd Avenue Buckeye Road to Glendale Avenue

43rd Avenue Thunderbird Road to Beardsley Road

43rd Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road

44th Street Washington Street to McDonald Drive

44TH STREET WASHINGTON STREET TO CAMPBELL AVENUE

44TH STREET CALLE FELIZ TO MCDONALD DRIVE

48th Street Chandler Boulevard to Piedmont Road

51st Avenue 0.5 Miles South of Lower Buckeye Road to Lower Buckeye
Road

51st Avenue Roosevelt Street to Camelback Road

51st Avenue 250 Feet South of Cactus Road to Union Hills Drive

51st Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road

52nd Street Van Buren Street to McDowell Road

56th Street Shea Boulevard to Bell Road

56th Street Central Arizona Project Canal to Deer Valley Drive

59th Avenue Dobbins Road to South Mountain Avenue




Page 144
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

59th Avenue Roosevelt Street to Camelback Road

64th Street Cactus Road to Bell Road

67th Avenue 400 Feet +/- South of Elwood Street to Camelback Road

67th Avenue Happy Valley Road to Pyramid Peak Parkway

75th Avenue Baseline Road to Vineyard Road

75th Avenue 0.25 Miles South of Thomas Road to Devonshire Avenue

83rd Avenue Van Buren Street to Papago Freeway

91st Avenue McDowell Road to Indian School Road

99th Avenue 0.5 Miles South of Lower Buckeye Road to Durango Street

107th Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road




Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Baseline Road 55th Avenue to 51st Avenue

Baseline Road 27th Avenue to 7th Avenue

Baseline Road 7th Street to 48th Street

Beardsley Road (Frontage Roads) 27th Avenue to 20th Street

Beardsley Road Frontage Road 27th Avenue to 51st Avenue
(Westbound)

Beardsley Road Frontage Road 51st Avenue to 37th Avenue
(Eastbound)

Bell Road 51st Avenue to 19th Avenue

Bell Road 12th Street to 0.25 Miles West of Cave Creek Road




Page 145
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Bell Road 1,500 Feet East of 40th Street to Scottsdale Road

Black Canyon Frontage Road Van Buren Street to Thomas Road

Black Canyon Frontage Road Cactus Road to Greenway Road
(Northbound)

Black Canyon Frontage Road Union Hills Drive to MP 213.34 (North of Bell Road)
(Southbound)

Black Canyon Frontage Road Bell Road to Mountain View Road Frontage Road
(Southbound) (Alignment)

Broadway Road 107th Avenue to 99th Avenue

Broadway Road 27th Avenue to 19th Avenue

Broadway Road 32nd Street to 48th Street

Buckeye Road 71st Avenue to 39th Avenue

Cactus Road 51st Avenue to 39th Avenue

Camelback Road 113th Avenue to 99th Avenue

Carefree Highway 4700 West to 3900 West

Carefree Highway 700 Feet East of 33rd Avenue to 0.5 Miles East of Via
Tramonto

Cave Creek Road Peoria Avenue to Marco Polo Road

Cave Creek Road Rose Garden Lane to Pinnacle Peak Road

Cave Creek Road (Southbound) Pinnacle Peak To 660 Feet +/- North of Quiet Hollow Lane

Cave Creek Road Peak View Road to Westland Road

Chandler Boulevard (Eastbound) 19th Avenue to 15th Avenue




Page 146
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Chandler Boulevard 15th Avenue to Marketplace Way

Chandler Boulevard 34th Street to Interstate 10

Deer Valley Drive 35th Avenue to 600 Feet West of 27th Avenue

Deer Valley Drive 0.25 Miles East of 19th Avenue to 600 Feet West of 16th
Street

Dixileta Drive Tatum Boulevard to 52nd Street

Dobbins Road 1,320 Feet +/- East of City Limit to 200 Feet +/- West of
56th Glen

Dobbins Road 0.25 Miles West of 35th Avenue to 33rd Avenue

Dobbins Road 27th Avenue to 23rd Avenue

Dove Valley Road 16th Avenue to Sonoran Desert Drive

Dynamite Boulevard Cave Creek Road to 40th Street

Grand Avenue 43rd Avenue to 21st Avenue

Greenway Parkway 17th Drive to 500 Feet West of 7th Avenue

Greenway Parkway 3rd Avenue to Cave Creek Road

Greenway Road 19th Avenue to 17th Drive

Greenway Road 300 Feet East of 30th Street to 52nd Street

Greenway Road 500 Feet East of 60th Street to Scottsdale Road

Happy Valley Road 67th Avenue to 35th Avenue

HAPPY VALLEY ROAD 67TH AVENUE TO 29th Avenue

HAPPY VALLEY ROAD 23RD AVENUE TO 7TH STREET




Page 147
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Happy Valley Road Black Canyon Freeway to 15th Avenue

Happy Valley Road 7th Avenue to 7th Street

Indian School Road 99th Avenue to 67th Avenue

Jomax Road Norterra Parkway to 19th Avenue

Lincoln Drive 800 Feet East of Ocotillo Road to 32nd Street

Lone Mountain Road 56th Street to 63rd Street

Lower Buckeye Road 95th Avenue to 83rd Avenue

Lower Buckeye Road 79th Avenue to 75th Avenue

Lower Buckeye Road 67th Avenue to 27th Avenue

Mayo Boulevard Tatum Boulevard to Scottsdale Road

McDowell Road 83rd Avenue to 43rd Avenue

McDowell Road 52nd Street to 1,350 Feet East of 52nd Street

McDowell Road 1,575 Feet West of Galvin Parkway to 64th Street

New River Road 1.0 Mile Southwest of Black Canyon Freeway to Black
Canyon Freeway

PINNACLE PEAK ROAD 55th Avenue to 19th Avenue

Pinnacle Peak Road 51st Avenue to 19th Avenue

Pinnacle Peak Road Cave Creek Road to Tatum Boulevard

Shea Boulevard 450 Feet East of 40th Street to 64th Street

Sonoran Desert Drive Dove Valley Road to Cave Creek Road

Southern Avenue 59th Avenue to 51st Avenue




Page 148
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Southern Avenue 31st Avenue to 19th Avenue

Southern Avenue 24th Street to 48th Street

Tatum Boulevard Mockingbird Lane to Pinnacle Peak Road

Tatum Boulevard Prickly Pear Trail to Cave Creek Road

Thomas Road 99th Avenue to 800 Feet West of 59th Avenue

Thunderbird Road 51st Avenue to 31st Avenue

Thunderbird Road Coral Gables Drive to 1,400 Feet East of 7th Street

Thunderbird Road 18th Street to Cave Creek Road

Union Hills Drive 51st Avenue to 27th Avenue

Union Hills Drive 19th Avenue to 7th Street

Union Hills Drive 20th Street to Tatum Boulevard

Van Buren Street 83rd Avenue to 67th Avenue

Van Buren Street 200 Feet West of 63rd Avenue to 39th Avenue

Van Buren Street 56th Street to 508 Feet East of Project Drive

Washington Street 34th Street to 56th Street

7th Avenue Union Hills Drive to Rose Garden Lane

7th Street 400 Feet North of Peoria Avenue to Thunderbird Road

7th Street 600 Feet North of Bell Road to Happy Valley Road

19th Avenue Dobbins Road to Southern Avenue

19th Avenue Evans Drive to Jomax Road




Page 149
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

24th Street Baseline Road to Roeser Road

24th Street Montebello Avenue to Lincoln Drive

27th Avenue Southern Avenue to Broadway Road

29th Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road

32nd Street Arizona Canal to Lincoln Drive

32nd Street Bell Road to Beardsley Road

35th Avenue 200 Feet South of Elliot Road to Dobbins Road

35th Avenue Baseline Road to 500 Feet +/- North

35th Avenue Broadway Road to Lower Buckeye Road

35th Avenue Bell Road to Union Hills Drive

35th Avenue Beardsley Road to Pinnacle Peak Road

40th Street Baseline Road to 800 Feet South of Roeser Road

43rd Avenue South Mountain Avenue to Southern Avenue

43rd Avenue Lower Buckeye Road to Buckeye Road

43rd Avenue Glendale Avenue to Thunderbird Road

48th Street Baseline Road to Southern Avenue

51st avenue Dobbins Road to Baseline Road

51st Avenue Baseline Road to Roosevelt Street

51st Avenue Union Hills Drive to Beardsley Road

59th Avenue Elliot Road to Dobbins Road




Page 150
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

59th Avenue Buckeye Road to Roosevelt Street

75th Avenue Broadway Road to Van Buren Street

75th Avenue Roosevelt Street 0.25 miles South of Thomas Road

75th Avenue Devonshire Avenue to Camelback Road

83rd Avenue Broadway Road to Elwood Street

83rd Avenue Papago Freeway to Camelback Road

91st Avenue Elwood Street to Buckeye Road

91st Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road

99th Avenue Durango Street to Buckeye Road




Table E. Prima Facie Speed Limit 50 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Black Canyon Freeway Greenway Road to Bell Road
Frontage Road (Northbound)

Black Canyon Freeway Union Hills Drive to Pinnacle Peak Road
Frontage Road

Black Canyon Freeway Happy Valley Road to Interstate 17 Mile Post No. 220.82 (South of
Frontage Roads Dixileta Drive Alignment)

Broadway Road 99th Avenue to 91st Avenue

Buckeye Road 75th Avenue to 71st Avenue

Cave Creek Road Pinnacle Peak Road to 660 Feet +/- North Of Quiet Hollow Lane
(Northbound)

Cave Creek Road 660 Feet +/- North of Quiet Hollow Lane To Peak View Road

Dobbins Road 43rd Avenue to 0.25 Miles West of 35th Avenue




Page 151
Table E. Prima Facie Speed Limit 50 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

El Mirage Road 0.25 Miles South of Camelback Road to 0.50 Miles North of
Camelback Road

Lower Buckeye Road 107th Avenue to 103rd Avenue

Lower Buckeye Road 83rd Avenue to 79th Avenue

Lower Buckeye Road 75th Avenue to 71st Avenue

McDowell Road 1,350 Feet East of 52nd Street to 1,575 Feet West of Galvin
Parkway

New River Road Cloud Road to 1.0 Mile Southwest of Black Canyon Freeway

Pinnacle Peak Road 51st Avenue to 43rd Avenue

Pinnacle Peak Road Cave Creek Road to Tatum Boulevard

Pinnacle Peak Road Tatum Boulevard to Scottsdale Road

Tatum Boulevard Pinnacle Peak Road to Prickly Pear Trail

Thunderbird Road 1,400 Feet East of 7th Street to 18th Street

51st Avenue Dobbins Road to Baseline Road

51st Avenue Estrella Drive to Olney Avenue

59th Avenue Broadway Road to Durango Street Alignment

75th Avenue Van Buren Street to Roosevelt Street

83rd Avenue Elwood Street to Buckeye Road

91st Avenue 1.56 Miles South of Broadway Road to 0.5 Miles South of
Broadway Road

99th Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road

99th Avenue 0.25 Miles North of Broadway Road to 0.5 Miles South of Lower




Page 152
Table E. Prima Facie Speed Limit 50 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Buckeye Road




Table F. Prima Facie Speed Limit 55 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Carefree Highway 6600 West to 4700 West

Carefree Highway 1,200 Feet East of 33rd Avenue to 0.5 Miles East of Via Tramanto



G. Parks.

1. North Mountain Park.

a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

North Mountain Park Entire Length
Drive

2. Papago Park.

a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

All roadways except Galvin Parkway.

3. Pecos Park.

a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

All roadways within park boundary.

4. South Mountain Park.

a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

All roadways within park boundary.

5. Squaw Peak Park.

a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Squaw Peak Road Squaw Peak Park Boundary to End of Road Within Squaw Peak
Park




Page 153
H. Sky Harbor Airport.

1. Prima Facie Speed Limit 15 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Sky Harbor Boulevard (North and Between Terminal Curb and Sky Harbor Boulevard
South Roadway) Median on All Terminals 2 and 3 and on Level 1 of
Terminal 4

Sky Harbor Boulevard (North and All Ticketing/Check-in Lanes on Level 2 of Terminal 4
South Roadway)

2. Prima Facie Speed Limit 20 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Sky Harbor Boulevard 4,400 Feet East of 24th Street to 6,300 Feet East of 24th Street
(South Roadway)

3. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Sky Harbor Boulevard All Ramps, Entries and Exits for All Ticketing/Check-in and Baggage
(North and South Claim Lanes at Terminals 3 and 4
Roadway)

4. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Sky Harbor Boulevard 3,000 Feet East of 24th Street to 4,400 Feet East of 24th Street
(South Roadway)



5. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Sky Harbor Boulevard Between 24th Street and SR 143, Except as Provided in the Prior
(North and South Subsections
Roadway)




Page 154
ATTACHMENT B
SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN CITY OF PHOENIX SPEED LIMITS
AMENDING SECTION 36-158, SCHEDULE I - LOCAL SPEED LIMITS

Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 mph at all times

Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
1,240 Feet East of 32nd
Remove private street from
Air Lane Street to 750 Feet East of 8
ordinance.
36th Street

Record keeping. Remove
Lincoln Street to Madison 7 and 8
Central Avenue from ordinance. Speed limit
Street
posted is 25 mph.

Record keeping. Change
Morten Avenue 16th Street to 1900 East 6
to reflect correct spelling.


Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 mph at all times

Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
32nd Street to 1,240 Feet Remove private street from
Air Lane 8
East of 32nd Street ordinance.
750 Feet East of 36th Street Remove private street from
Air Lane 8
to 40th Street ordinance.
Record keeping. Raise
20th Street to Cave Creek
ordinance speed limit from 30
Beardsley Road Road
mph to 35 mph to reflect 2
posted speed limit.
Record keeping. Set both
eastbound and westbound
Happy Valley Road 29th Avenue to 23rd Avenue 1
ordinance speed limit to 35 mph
to reflect posted speed limit.

Remove from ordinance.
Hess Street 24th Street to 26th Street Street no longer exists with
Sky Train extension.

Remove private street from 8
Old Tower Road 26th Street to 32nd Street
ordinance.

Record keeping. Segment
Pointe Golf Club Thunderbird Road to Sharon from Friess Drive to Sharon 3
Drive Drive Drive not included in previous
ordinance.
Record keeping. Remove
Roosevelt Street 59th Avenue to 51st Avenue from ordinance. Speed
limit posted is 25 mph

Record keeping. 8
Washington Street 7th Street to 24th Street
Duplicate entry.

Remove from ordinance.
Old Tower Road to Hess
26th Street Street no longer exists with
Street 8
Sky Harbor expansion.




Page 155
Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 mph at all times

Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
Record keeping. Raise
Black Mountain Boulevard to ordinance speed limit from 30
Mayo Boulevard
40th Street mph to 40 mph to reflect 2
posted speed limit.
Speed limit change. Raise
ordinance speed limit from
Black Mountain Mayo Boulevard to Pinnacle 35 mph to 40 mph from 2
Boulevard Peak Road Deer Valley Drive to Rough
Rider Road due to roadway
construction improvements.
Record keeping. Remove
Washington Street to portion from Campbell 6
44th Street
Campbell Avenue Avenue to Calle Feliz that is
posted at 35 mph.


Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 mph at all times

Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change Council District
Record keeping. Raise
ordinance speed limit from
Happy Valley Road 67th Avenue to 29th Avenue 1
40 mph to 45 mph to reflect
posted speed limit.
Record keeping. Combine
segments and add 15th
Happy Valley Road 23rd Avenue to 7th Street 1
Avenue to 7th Avenue to
reflect posted speed limit.
Record keeping. Lower
ordinance speed limit from
50 mph to 45 mph for the
Pinnacle Peak Road 55th Avenue to 19th Avenue 1
portion between 55th Avenue
to 51st Avenue to reflect
posted speed limit.



Note: All speed limit changes were recommended based on a traffic study and approved by a Traffic
Engineer.




Page 156



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Grand Canal Phase III - Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction Services -
ST87600131 (Ordinance S-47468)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Hunter Contracting Co., to provide Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction
Services for the Grand Canal Phase III project. Further request to authorize execution
of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved
expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $100,000.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to install pathway for pedestrians and bicycle use and
incorporate public art, landscaping and neighborhood access points along the Grand
Canal between 75th and 47th avenues.

Hunter Contracting Co. will begin in an agency support role for Construction Manager
at Risk Preconstruction Services. Hunter Contracting Co. will assume the risk of
delivering the project through a Guaranteed Maximum Price agreement.

Hunter Contracting Co’s services include, but are not limited to, providing detailed cost
estimating; planning and scheduling project construction phases; performing site
investigation including utility potholing; providing constructability studies; and
coordination with City staff and design consultant. A Small Business Enterprise goal
will be established for this project upon substantial completion of Preconstruction
Services and prior to the start of construction.

This Agreement is essential to the health, safety, and welfare of the public and critical
operations for the City.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Four firms submitted proposals
and are listed below:


Page 157


Selected Firm
Rank 1: Hunter Contracting Co.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: J. Banicki Construction, Inc.
Rank 3: Combs Construction Company, Inc.
Rank 4: Sunland Asphalt & Construction, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is two years from issuance of the Notice to Proceed. Work
scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may
be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Hunter Contracting Co. will not exceed $100,000, including
all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Engineering Services Agreement 153853 (Ordinance S-47337) on March 3, 2021.

Location
Grand Canal between 75th and 47th avenues
Council Districts: 4 and 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 158



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
3rd Street Promenade: Garfield Street to Indian School Road Modernization -
Design-Bid-Build Services - ST87100162 (Ordinance S-47473)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept Hunter Contracting
Co. as the lowest-priced, responsive and responsible bidder and to enter into an
agreement with Hunter Contracting Co. for Design-Bid-Build Services for the 3rd Street
Promenade: Garfield Street to Indian School Road Modernization project. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
fee for services will not exceed $7,567,049.20.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to improve traffic circulation and increase safety and
mobility for pedestrians and bicyclists by implementing a new lane configuration.

Hunter Contracting Co.’s services include, but are not limited to, providing one lane in
each direction with a center turn lane; adding bicycle lanes on both sides of the street;
asphalt pavement replacement, microsurfacing and crack seal; concrete sidewalk and
curb ramps; streetlighting; landscaping and irrigation; traffic signals; and other ancillary
items.

This agreement is essential to the health, safety, and welfare of the public and critical
operations for the City.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using an Invitation for Bids procurement process set forth in
section 34-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Two bids were received on Feb. 16,
2021, and were sent to the Equal Opportunity Department for review to determine
subcontractor eligibility and contractor responsiveness in demonstrating
responsiveness to Small Business Enterprise program requirements.

The Opinion of Probable Cost and the one lowest responsive, responsible bidder is
listed below:

Opinion of Probable Cost: $7,271,803.67
Hunter Contracting Co.: $7,567,049.20


Page 159


Bidder who was deemed non-responsive is listed below:
AJP Electric, Inc.

The bid award amount is within the total budget for this project.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is 300 calendar days from issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Hunter Contracting Co. will not exceed $7,567,049.20,
including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Location
3rd Street: Garfield Street to Indian School Road
Council Districts: 4, 7, 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 160



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Falcon Park and Momo Park Renovations - Engineering Services - PA75200491
(Ordinance S-47477)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Gavan and Barker, Inc., to provide Engineering Services that include design and
construction administration and inspection services for the Falcon Park and Momo
Park Renovations projects. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to
the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The fee for services will not exceed $90,000.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to provide various park renovation improvements to
Falcon Park and Momo Park. The projects will be bid separately using federal funds
under the Neighborhood Services Department.

In September 2020, Gavan and Barker, Inc. was issued an initial Notice to Proceed
under the 2019-20 Engineering On-Call Services contract to provide design services
that included plans, bid assistance, and submittals for Falcon Park and Momo Park
renovations. The contract has since expired and Gavan and Barker, Inc. was not
selected under the new 2021-22 Engineering On-Call Services contract. Gavan and
Barker, Inc. has completed significant work on the project and the need to have the
original designer available for the pre-bid meeting, to answer questions regarding the


Page 161

prepared plans, and for construction administration and inspection services is
essential.

Gavan and Barker, Inc.'s continued services include, but are not limited to: plan
submittals, bid assistance, and providing construction administration and inspection
services through the construction of the projects.

This agreement is essential to the health, safety and welfare of the public and critical
operations for the City.

Procurement Information
Gavan and Barker, Inc. was chosen for this project using a Direct Select process set
forth in section 34-103 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. The Direct Select process will
reduce the time to procure additional design and construction administration and
inspection services, as opposed to an advertised selection process; therefore, meeting
the project deadline and ensuring continuity and the most efficient use of staff and
funding resources.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is 215 calendar days from the issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Gavan and Barker, Inc. will not exceed $90,000, including all
subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Parks and Recreation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered
agreement services, which may extend past the agreement termination.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Citywide Engineering/Consulting On-Call Services for
Calendar Years 2019-20 Agreement 148782 (Ordinance S-45138) on Nov. 14, 2018.

Locations
Falcon Park - 3420 W. Roosevelt St.
Momo Park - 5447 S. 5th Place
Council Districts: 4 and 7



Page 162

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Inger Erickson and Mario Paniagua,
the Parks and Recreation Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 163



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Indian School Fiber Transportation Enhancement - Design-Bid-Build Services -
ST89360035 (Ordinance S-47479)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept MP Nexlevel, LLC,
as the lowest-priced, responsive and responsible bidder and to enter into an
agreement with MP Nexlevel, LLC for Design-Bid-Build Services for the Indian School
Fiber Transportation Enhancement project. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed
$2,813,113.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to expand the current fiber optic infrastructure
communication network equipment to allow for remote monitoring and control and
traffic signal optimization along a 12.5-mile route to the western limits of the City of
Phoenix. The fiber optic line will traverse through a portion of the City of Glendale and
through Arizona Department of Transportation managed right-of-way; the fiber will
serve City of Phoenix needs.

MP Nexlevel, LLC’s services include, but are not limited to: installing a majority of new
conduit infrastructure; utilizing existing conduit infrastructure to the extent possible to
fill in gaps along the existing conduit path; connecting to existing traffic signals along
the route; installing fiber and pull box infrastructure and a Layer 3 network switch at
two locations; connection to City of Phoenix and neighboring agency existing fiber
communications cable; and other miscellaneous work items as required to complete
the project.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

This agreement is essential to the health, safety, and welfare of the public and critical
operations for the City.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using an Invitation for Bids procurement process set forth in
section 34-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Five bids were received on Feb. 23,


Page 164

2021 and were sent to the Equal Opportunity Department for review to determine
subcontractor eligibility and contractor responsiveness in demonstrating
responsiveness to Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program requirements.

The Opinion of Probable Cost and the three lowest responsive, responsible bidders
are listed below:

Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost: $4,177,835.00
MP Nexlevel, LLC: $2,813,113.00
Roadway Electric, LLC: $2,966,295.00
CS Construction, Inc: $3,116,942.00

Bidders who were deemed non-responsive are listed below, in alphabetical order:
B&F Contracting, Inc.: $5,313,055.94
Sturgeon Electric Company, Inc.: $2,614,426.50

The bid award amount is within the total budget for this project.

The reason for the variance from the Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost to the
lowest, responsive, responsible bid is the pricing for the electrical conduit and the
electrical system was developed based on contractor's pricing on similar projects in
other jurisdictions during 2020, and the pricing for the fiber optic equipment was based
on very old historical bid information. The Engineer evaluated the bids received by the
City and compared them to the Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost, and did not find
any severe variations of unit prices that would cause concern to prevent the City from
moving forward with awarding this project to MP Nexlevel, LLC.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is 270 calendar days from issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for MP Nexlevel, LLC will not exceed $2,813,113, including all
subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

This project will utilize federal funds and is subject to the requirements of 49 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 26 and the U.S. Department of Transportation DBE
Program. Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital
Improvement Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately


Page 165

review and approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments.
Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services,
which may extend past the agreement termination.

Location
· 99th Avenue from Camelback to Indian School roads
· Campbell Avenue from 99th Avenue to Phoenix Fire Station 54
· Indian School Road from 99th Avenue to Loop 101 Agua Fria Freeway
· Indian School Road from Loop 101 Agua Fria Freeway to 27th Avenue
· 27th Avenue from Indian School to Camelback roads
· Camelback Road from 27th to 23rd avenues
· 23rd Avenue from Camelback Road to Phoenix Fire Station 18

City of Glendale:
· 99th Avenue from Cardinals Way to Camelback Road

Arizona Department of Transportation:
· Indian School Road at Loop 101 Agua Fria Freeway
· Camelback Road at Black Canyon Freeway

Council Districts: 4, 5, 7 and Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 166



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Northwest Valley Transportation - Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction
Services - ST85100449 (Ordinance S-47495)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Hunter Contracting Co. to provide Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction
Services for the Northwest Valley Transportation project. Further request to authorize
execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved
expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $150,000.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to construct approximately three miles of arterial streets,
including street lighting and landscaping, in support of the Taiwan Semiconductor
Manufacturing Company (TSMC) facility. One traffic signal located at the intersection
of Dove Valley Road and 43rd Avenue and another at a driveway entrance into the
TSMC site at 43rd Avenue will also be included in this project.

Hunter Contracting Co. will begin in an agency support role for Construction Manager
at Risk Preconstruction Services. Hunter Contracting Co. will assume the risk of
delivering the project through a Guaranteed Maximum Price agreement.

Hunter Contracting Co.'s services include, but are not limited to, installation of asphalt,
curb, gutter, sidewalk, drainage facilities, streetlights, and landscaping that will serve
the TSMC facility and surrounding region. A Small Business Enterprise goal will be
established for this project upon substantial completion of Preconstruction Services
and prior to the start of construction.

This Agreement is essential to the health, safety, and welfare of the public and critical
operations for the City.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Five firms submitted proposals


Page 167

and are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Hunter Contracting Co.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Haydon Builiding Corp.
Rank 3: Sundt Construction, Inc.
Rank 4: Kiewit Infrastructure West Co.
Rank 5: Ames Construction, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is 180 calendar days from issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Hunter Contracting Co. will not exceed $150,000, including
all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Development Agreement with Taiwan Semiconductor
Manufacturing Company (Ordinance S-47129) on Nov. 18, 2020.

Location
The site is bounded by I-17 Freeway to the east, the Loop 303 Freeway to the south,
the Deadman Wash to the west, and State Route 74 to the north.
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua, the Street
Transportation Department, and the City Engineer.




Page 168



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Centrifuges Agreement for Water Production Plants - Request for Award
(Ordinance S-47471)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Alfa Laval, Inc. to provide centrifuge parts and services for the purpose of
maintaining the centrifuges at the Water Production Plants for the Water Services
Department. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement
as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below,
and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of
the agreement will not exceed $2.2 million.

Summary
The purpose of this agreement is to provide parts and services for the existing
centrifuges used by the Water Production Plants. The centrifuges are necessary
equipment that remove debris and sludge from the surface water in the production
process.

This direct selection is necessary because Alfa Laval, Inc. is the sole source provider
for the Alfa Laval Centrifuges.

Alfa Laval, Inc.'s services include, but are not limited to parts, service, and
troubleshooting when necessary.

Procurement Information
An exception to the procurement process was determined to select the Contractor as
set forth in City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10. A direct selection was made
because there is only one known capable supplier of goods or services due to the
unique nature of the requirement, supplier, or market condition.

Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about July 1, 2021, for a seven-year aggregate term
with no options to extend.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Alfa Laval, Inc. will not exceed $2.2 million.


Page 169


Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.




Page 170



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Microbiological Products Agreement - Request for Award (Ordinance S-47476)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with IDEXX Distribution Corporation, to provide microbiological reagents and supplies
for the purpose of testing water samples and to comply with state and federal
regulatory required analytical methods. Further request to authorize execution of
amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure
authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The agreement value will not exceed $685,000.

Summary
The purpose of this agreement is to provide microbiological reagents and supplies to
the Water Services Department for the purpose of testing the drinking water provided
to the City of Phoenix customers.

This direct selection is necessary because IDEXX Distribution Corporation is the sole
distributor of the water testing items that comply with U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency analytical methods and Arizona Department of Health Services (ADHS)
requirements. The City of Phoenix Water Services Compliance Laboratory is licensed
under the same methods and required to use the approved products.

IDEXX Distribution Corporation's services include, but are not limited to: sole
distribution of certain Dynal brand products related to Dynabead Giardia,
Crytosordium, Quanit-trays and SimPlate reagents and supplies as well as HPC test
kits.

Procurement Information
An exception to the procurement process was determined to select the Contractor
pursuant to City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10. A direct selection was
made because there exists only one known capable supplier of goods or services due
to the unique nature of the requirement, supplier, or market condition.

Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about May 1, 2021, for a five-year aggregate term with
no options to extend.


Page 171


Financial Impact
The agreement value for IDEXX Distribution Corporation will not exceed $685,000.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department Operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.




Page 172



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Agreement with Valley Metro Rail, Inc. for Northwest Extension Phase II Light
Rail Train Project Utility Relocation Services - WS85500330 (Ordinance S-47478)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Valley Metro Rail, Inc., to procure services to relocate Water facilities that are near
the Northwest Extension Phase II Light Rail Train Project. Further request to authorize
execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved
expenditure authority, as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The total value of this agreement will not exceed $6.95
million.

Summary
The Water Services Department (WSD) owns water and wastewater infrastructure
throughout the Light Rail Train (LRT) project area which require relocation to meet
Valley Metro Rail, Inc. (METRO) and City of Phoenix standards. METRO standards
require infrastructure within 10 feet of the centerline of the track to be relocated. These
relocations are paid for as part of the LRT Project using Proposition 400 or Transit
2050 funds. WSD established an additional standard to review and relocate
infrastructure within 16 feet of the centerline of the track on a case-by-case basis.
Infrastructure relocations outside of the METRO standard are paid for by WSD using
Capital Improvement Program funds.

Based on the LRT Project’s current design, there is existing water infrastructure within
the impacted construction area of the project which must be relocated in conformance
with the LRT Project schedule, to meet these standards.

METRO will relocate the affected facilities through the use of a procured contractor,
and the City will reimburse METRO for construction costs associated with the
relocations.

Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about July 1, 2021, and the term of this agreement is
through June 30, 2026.




Page 173

Financial Impact
The total value for this agreement will not exceed $6.95 million. Funding for the project
is available in the Water Services Department Capital Improvement Program budget.

Location
The LRT Project is located along Dunlap Avenue from 19th to 25th avenues, along
25th Avenue from Dunlap to Mountain View avenues, and along Mountain View
Avenue from 25th Avenue (crossing Interstate 17) to MetroCenter.
Council Districts: 1, 3 and 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.




Page 174



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Generator Maintenance Service and Fuel Supply - Request for Award (Ordinance
S-47480)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Empire Power Systems to provide generator maintenance services for the
purpose of maintaining proper functionality of 16 emergency standby power generators
within Water Services Booster Stations and Water Treatment Plants. Further request to
authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-
approved expenditure authority, as provided below, and for the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The agreement value will not exceed $3 million.

Summary
The purpose of this agreement is to provide regular and consistent maintenance by
specialized technical staff that are proficient with the specific types of industrial sized
emergency generators installed within Water Services Department's treatment plants
and booster stations.

This direct selection is necessary because of the specialized type of equipment and
the need to use the authorized service provider for CAT generators.

Empire Power Systems' services include but are not limited to: provision of all
materials and specialized labor required to adequately service and maintain optimal
performance of 16 emergency standby power generators on a regular schedule over
the contract term of five years.

Procurement Information
An exception to the procurement process was determined to select the Contractor
pursuant to City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10. A direct selection was
made because there exists a lack of qualified/available contractors which makes a
competitive selection process impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.

Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about July 1, 2021 for a five-year aggregate term.



Page 175


Financial Impact
The aggregate value for Empire Power Systems will not exceed $3 million.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.




Page 176



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Riverware Software Agreement with University of Colorado - Request for Award
(Ordinance S-47488)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with University of Colorado, to provide annual software registration for the purpose of
continuing research using the proprietary Riverware software system. Further request
to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
agreement value will not exceed $20,000.

Summary
The purpose of this agreement is to quantify the potential effects of shortages from
Colorado River water on the volumes received by the City of Phoenix using Riverware
software developed by the University of Colorado.

This direct selection is necessary because the University of Colorado is the sole
proprietor of the Riverware modeling software and the sole source for obtaining annual
renewals required to maintain the program within the City of Phoenix Water Services
Department.

The University of Colorado's services include, but are not limited to: owner of the
intellectual property associated with the Riverware modeling software and sole
provider of the software through the Center for Advanced Decision Support for Water
and Environmental Systems (CADSWES).

Procurement Information
An exception to the procurement process was determined to select the Contractor
pursuant to City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10. A direct selection was
made because there exists only one known capable supplier of goods or services due
to the unique nature of the requirement, supplier, or market condition.

Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about May 19, 2021, for a five-year aggregate term
with no options to extend.




Page 177

Financial Impact
The agreement value for the University of Colorado will not exceed $20,000.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department Operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Karen Peters and the Water Services
Department.




Page 178



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Norterra PUD Parcels 7, 8 & 9 - PLAT 200635 - North of Happy Valley
Road and East of 21st Avenue

Plat: 200635
Project: 15-3108
Name of Plat: Norterrra PUD Parcels 7, 8 & 9
Owner(s): US Relp Norterra East I, LLC
Engineer(s): Ethan Boyle, PE and Thomas Gettings, RLS
Request: A 16 Lot Detached Single Family Plat
Reviewed by Staff: March 16, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located north of Happy Valley Road and east of 21st Avenue.
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 179



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Talinn Phase 2 - PLAT 200545 - North of Deer Valley Road and East of
56th Street

Plat: 200545
Project: 06-657
Name of Plat: Talinn Phase 2
Owner(s): DR Horton, Inc. and Shea Homes, LP
Engineer(s): Brian Diehl, RLS
Request: A 273 Lot Single Family Subdivision Plat
Reviewed by Staff: March 19, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located north of Deer Valley Road and east of 56th Street.
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 180



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Shops at Chauncey Mayo - PLAT 200624 - Southeast Corner of Allied
Way and Mayo Boulevard

Plat: 200624
Project: 00-8265
Name of Plat: Shops at Chauncey Mayo
Owner(s): Levine Investments, Limited Partnership
Engineer(s): Leonard J. Erie, RLS
Request: A 4 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: March 11, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at the southeast corner of Allied Way and Mayo Boulevard.
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 181



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Lexia Manor - PLAT 200579 - South of State Avenue and East of 15th
Avenue

Plat: 200579
Project: 19-3539
Name of Plat: Lexia Manor
Owner(s): Lexia Development, LLC
Engineer(s): Keogh Engineering, Inc.
Request: A 5 Lot Residential Plat
Reviewed by Staff: March 18, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located south of State Avenue and east of 15th Avenue.
Council District: 3

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 182



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Mesquite Terrace - PLAT 200534 - North of Camelback Road on the
East Side of 19th Avenue

Plat: 200534
Project: 17-2967
Name of Plat: Mesquite Terrace
Owner(s): Trinity Housing Development, LLC
Engineer(s): David S. Klein, RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: March 17, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located north of Camelback Road on the east side of 19th Avenue.
Council District: 4

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 183



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Karma Subdivision - PLAT 210006 - East of 13th Place and South of
Bethany Home Road

Plat: 210006
Project: 20-2243
Name of Plat: Karma Subdivision
Owner(s): BVI-1317, LLC
Engineer(s): Paul M. Miller, RLS
Request: A 11 Lot Residential Plat
Reviewed by Staff: March 22, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located east of 13th Place and south of Bethany Home Road.
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 184



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Zora Encanto - PLAT 200597 - Northeast Corner of 83rd Avenue and
Encanto Boulevard

Plat: 200597
Project: 19-2618
Name of Plat: Zora Encanto
Owner(s): Encanto OZ, SPE, LLC
Engineer(s): Douglas B. Toney, RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: March 19, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at the northeast corner of 83rd Avenue and Encanto Boulevard.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 185



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Retreat at Tuscano - PLAT 200600 - Southwest Corner of 75th Avenue
and Lower Buckeye Road

Plat: 200600
Project: 02-3184
Name of Plat: Retreat at Tuscano
Owner(s): Nextgen Apartments - 75 LB, LLC
Engineer(s): Anthony L. Slater, RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: March 19, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at the southwest corner of 75th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 186



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - McClellan Ranch - Parcels 2B & 3B - PLAT 200601 - North of Dobbins
Road, West of 67th Avenue Alignment

Plat: 200601
Project: 17-1627
Name of Plat: McClellan Ranch - Parcels 2B & 3B
Owner(s): Pulte Home Company, LLC and Meritage Homes of Arizona, Inc.
Engineer(s): Brian J. Benedict, RLS
Request: A 97 Lot Subdivision Plat
Reviewed by Staff: March 19, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located 2,000 feet north of Dobbins Road, west of 67th Avenue Alignment.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 187



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - McClellan Ranch - Parcels 6B & 7 - PLAT 200602 - Northwest Corner
of 67th Avenue and Dobbins Road

Plat: 200602
Project: 17-1627
Name of Plat: McClellan Ranch - Parcels 6B & 7
Owner(s): Pulte Home Company, LLC and Meritage Homes of Arizona, Inc.
Engineer(s): Brian J. Benedict, RLS
Request: A 110 Lot Subdivision Plat
Reviewed by Staff: March 19, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at the northwest corner of 67th Avenue and Dobbins Road.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 188



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Earll 6 SFA Subdivision - PLAT 200617 - West of 38th Street and
South of Earll Drive

Plat: 200617
Project: 18-1790
Name of Plat: Earll 6 SFA Subdivision
Owner(s): Russell P. Black, PLLC
Engineer(s): Kent D. Miller, RLS
Request: A 6 Lot Residential Plat
Reviewed by Staff: March 22, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located west of 38th Street and south of Earll Drive.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 189



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Final Plat - Sherman Place - PLAT 200620 - Southwest Corner of 2nd Avenue and
Sherman Street

Plat: 200620
Project: 19-4408
Name of Plat: Sherman Place
Owner(s): Morris Thomas/Susan
Engineer(s): Paul M. Miller, RLS
Request: A 1 Lot Commercial Plat
Reviewed by Staff: March 22, 2021
Final Plat requires Formal Action Only

Summary
Staff requests that the above plat be approved by the City Council and certified by the
City Clerk. Recording of the plat dedicates the streets and easements as shown to the
public.

Location
Generally located at the southwest corner of 2nd Avenue and Sherman Street.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 190



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Easement - ABND 200510 - Northeast Corner of Happy Valley
Road and Norterra Parkway (Resolution 21916)

Abandonment: ABND 200510
Project: 15-3108
Applicant(s): AHW Construction, Inc.
Request: To abandon drainage easement FN 190070, recording number with Maricopa
County Recorder's office, 2019-1035710 and FN 190010, recording number with
Maricopa County Recorder's office 2019-0430679.
Date of Decision/Hearing: May 15, 2020

Location
Northeast corner of Happy Valley Road and Norterra Parkway
Council District:1

Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this abandonment, although filing
fees were paid.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 191



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Easement - ABND 200532 - Southwest Corner of Baseline Road
and 43rd Avenue (Resolution 21917)

Abandonment: ABND 200532
Project: 19-822
Applicant: Keith Green
Request: To abandon entirety of multi-use trail easement and vehicular non-access
easement, adjacent to parcels addressed 4343 W. Baseline Road and 7900 S. 43rd
Ave.
Date of Decision/Hearing: Sept. 9, 2020

Location
Southwest corner of Baseline Road and 43rd Avenue
Council District: 8

Financial Impact
None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this abandonment, although filing
fees were paid.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 192



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Right-of-Way - V190022A - 214 S. 37th Street (Resolution 21918)

Abandonment: V190022A
Project: 99-40227
Applicant: Sebastian Sandersins
Request: To abandon a 13-foot right-of-way along the east end of lot addressed 214 S.
37th Street, per ordinance S-3250.
Date of Decision/Hearing: May 9, 2019

Location
214 S. 37th Street
Council District: 8

Financial Impact
A consideration fee was also collected as part of this abandonment in the amount of
$6,500.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 193



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Modification of Stipulation Request for Ratification of March 17, 2021 Planning
Hearing Officer Action - PHO-3-21--Z-129-95-3 - Approximately 330 Feet East of
the Southeast Corner of 7th Avenue and Bell Road

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve Planning Hearing
Officer's recommendation without further hearing by the City Council on matters heard
by the Planning Hearing Officer on March 17, 2021. This ratification requires formal
action only.

Summary
Application: PHO-3-21--Z-129-95-3
Existing Zoning: C-2
Acreage: 1.68

Applicant: Geyser Management, LLC
Owner: Turner Property Development II, LLC
Representative: Susan Demmitt, Gammage & Burnham, PLC

Proposal:
1. Deletion of Stipulation 1 regarding general conformance to the site plan dated Sept.
18, 1995.
2. Deletion of Stipulation 6 regarding driveways on 7th Avenue and Bell Road.
3. Deletion of Stipulation 7 limiting number and design of pads.
4. Deletion of Stipulation 9 regarding a variance for an eight-foot wall on the south
property line.
5. Deletion of Stipulation 10 regarding construction, maintenance, and repair of the
south perimeter wall.
6. Deletion of Stipulation 12 regarding an average 25-foot landscape buffer along the
south property line.
7. Deletion of Stipulation 13 prohibiting illumination of the ice rink roof.
8. Deletion of Stipulation 14 regarding speed bumps in main driveway aisles.
9. Deletion of Stipulation 15 limiting height of freestanding signs.
10.Deletion of Stipulation 16 regarding notifications for future Site Plan Review
Division meetings.
11.Deletion of Stipulation 17 requiring construction commence within 24 months of City


Page 194

Council approval.
12.Technical corrections to Stipulations 3 and 5.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation: The Deer Valley Village
Planning Committee heard this case on March 11, 2021 and recommended approval
with a modification, by a vote of 8-0.
Planning Hearing Officer Recommendation: The Planning Hearing Officer heard this
case on March 17, 2021, and recommended approval with a modification and an
additional stipulation. Please see Attachment A for a complete list of the Planning
Hearing Officer's recommended stipulations.

Location
Approximately 330 feet east of the southeast corner of 7th Avenue and Bell Road
Council District: 3
Parcel Address: 601 W. Bell Road

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 195
Attachment A- Stipulations- PHO-3-21_Z-129-95-3

Location: Approximately 330 feet east of the southeast corner of 7th Avenue and Bell
Road

Stipulations:

1. That development be in general conformance to the site plan dated September
18, 1995, as amended by the stipulations below.

1. That An average 40-foot landscaped setback SHALL be provided along Bell
2. Road. No more than 50 percent of this landscape setback shall be used for
retention purposes.

2. That An average 20-foot landscaped setback SHALL be provided along 7th
3. Avenue. Landscaping within this setback shall include mature shade trees,
planted 20 feet on-center or in equivalent groupings as approved by the
PLANNING AND Development Services Department. This landscape setback
shall also include berming and/or decorative walls to screen the parking areas
as approved by the PLANNING AND Development Services Department. No
more than 50 percent of this landscaped setback may be used for retention
purposes.

3. That The portion of landscaping or usable hardspace that surrounds each
4. commercial pad area SHALL be approximately 35 percent of the building
square footage. That Approximately one-third (1/3) of the site improvements
surrounding the building should be landscaped. If no parking is provided in front
of the pad, all landscaping behind the public sidewalk on the pad site may be
utilized in meeting this stipulation.

4. That Sidewalks within required setback areas SHALL be set back a minimum of
5. eight (8) feet from the curb on Bell Road and 7th Avenue to create a landscaped
buffer between pedestrians and adjacent automobile traffic, as approved by
THE PLANNING AND Development Services Department.

5. That Site access shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) driveways each to
6. 7th Avenue and Bell Road. Shared access shall be provided with the adjoining
land to the east, if developed with commercial zoning.

7. That three pads be allowed, but designed to minimize the effect of a strip mall,
including maximizing view corridor and integrating landscaping.

6. That The applicant shall agree to record covenants, conditions and restriction
8. (CC & R’s) on the property ensuring the continued maintenance of the property
and that trash or graffiti that appear within the boundaries of the development
be removed within forty-eight (48) hours after discovery in order to discourage
future defacement and destruction of the property.

9. That, within 120 days of approval by the City Council of the requested C-2
zoning, that applicant shall file a variance request with the Zoning Administrator
seeking approval of an eight (8) foot high wall to be constructed on the south
property line between the subject property and the D.R. Horton residential
Page 196
development located to the south. Should the request for an over-height wall be
approved, the perimeter wall shall be shown on the site plan for the ice rink to
be submitted to the Site Plan Division of the Development Services Department.

10. That the south perimeter wall shall be constructed prior to or concurrent with
development located adjacent to the south property line. Said wall shall be fully
grouted (for noise attenuation) and shall include a design, materials, and paint
consistent with the existing D.R. Horton perimeter wall. The maintenance and
repair of the proposed wall shall be the responsibility of the commercial property
owner adjacent to the wall.

7. That All freestanding security lighting shall be of recessed cut-off design and
11. shall conform to the lighting standards of the City of Phoenix.

12. That an average twenty-five (25) foot landscape buffer be provided along the
south property line. Said landscape buffer shall be planted with a double row of
drought-resistant shade trees spaced twenty (20) feet on center in a staggered
alignment and shrubbery as approved by the Site Plan Division of the
Development Services Department of the City of Phoenix. The commercial
property owner adjacent to the proposed landscape strip shall maintain the
landscaping and replace any dead trees or shrubs in a timely manner, not to
exceed four (4) weeks after removal.

13. That the ice rink roof shall not be illuminated.

14. That the main driveway aisles on the ice rink site shall incorporate speed
bumps.

15. That any freestanding sign for the ice rink be limited to ten (10) feet in height
maximum.

16. That the applicant and the City of Phoenix Site Plan Division shall notify Ken
Groom (415 W. Aire Libre, Phoenix, AZ 85023) and Jeff Marek (604 W. Kelton,
Phoenix, AZ 85023) for future meetings with the City of Phoenix Development
Services Site Plan Review Division regarding the subject site.

17. That construction of the ice rink shall commence within 24 months of City
Council approval in accordance with Section 506.B.

8. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS IN A FORM
APPROVED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. THE WAIVER SHALL BE
RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE AND
DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REZONING
APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.




Page 197



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Modification of Stipulation Request for Ratification of March 17, 2021 Planning
Hearing Officer Action - PHO-4-21--Z-40-85-6 - Northeast Corner of 44th Street
and Flower Street

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve Planning Hearing
Officer's recommendation without further hearing by the City Council on matters heard
by the Planning Hearing Officer on March 17, 2021. This ratification requires formal
action only.

Summary
Application: PHO-4-21--Z-40-85-6
Existing Zoning: C-O
Acreage: 1.90

Applicant: Tim Rasnake, Archicon AAI, LC
Owner: DOC-331 North 44th Street MOBs, LLC
Representative: Tim Rasnake, Archicon AAI, LC

Proposal:
1. Deletion of Stipulation 8 restricting FAR to a maximum of 0.33.
2. Deletion of Stipulation 10 regarding conditional zoning approval.
3. Deletion of Stipulation 13 regarding a pool and construction fence.
4. Deletion of Stipulation 14 regarding landscaping and a watering system.
5. Deletion of Stipulation 15 regarding a six-foot wall along residences to the east.
6. Deletion of Stipulation 16 regarding a landscape and watering plan.
7. Deletion of Stipulation 17 regarding compliance with Stipulations 15 and 16.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation: The Camelback East Village
Planning Committee opted not to hear this request.
Planning Hearing Officer Recommendation: The Planning Hearing Officer heard this
case on March 17, 2021, and recommended approval with an additional stipulation.
Please see Attachment A for a complete list of the Planning Hearing Officer's
recommended stipulations.



Page 198

Location
Northeast corner of 44th Street and Flower Street
Council District: 6
Parcel Address: 3333 N. 44th St.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 199
Attachment A- Stipulations- PHO-4-21--Z-40-85-6

Location: Northeast corner of 44th Street and Flower Street

Stipulations:

1. That The project shall be built in substantial compliance with the site plan and
elevations dated January 27, 1985.

2. That There SHALL be a one-foot vehicular non-access easement dedicated to
the City of Phoenix along the south side of the parcel to preclude access to and
from the project along Flower Street.

3. That A landscaped setback of 25 feet shall be provided along Flower Street and
a 20-foot landscaped setback shall be provided along 44th Street.

4. That THE landscaping plan along the east boundary line of the site shall provide
for a continuous oleander hedge with any existing void spaces to be replanted
with 15-gallon oleander plants six feet on center.

5. That The maximum height of the buildings shall be in accordance with R-O
Ordinance.

6. That Access SHALL be limited to 44th Street.

7. That A mature landscape barrier SHALL be provided as follows:

a. 10 feet on the east property line.

b. 25 feet on the south property line.

c. 20 feet on the west property line.

8. That the FAR not exceed 0.33.

8. That There shall be a 10-foot setback along the east property line.
9.

10. That approval of this rezoning be conditioned upon development in accordance
with Section 108-K of the Zoning Ordinance within 60 days of City Council’s
August 26, 1987 approval action.

9. That the Trash pickup shall be limited to the daylight hours on the weekdays.
11.

10. That Sufficient right-of-way SHALL be dedicated within one year of final City
12. Council action to provide:

a. A 50-foot half street for 44th Street.

b. A 12-foot radius at 44th Street and Flower Street.
Page 200
13. That the pool remaining in the cleared area be filled and the construction fence
surrounding the property removed.

14. That the site be landscaped/grassed with an appropriate watering system
installed within 60 days of City Council action, as approved by the Development
Coordination Office.

15. That within 60 days, a six-foot wall be constructed along the residences to the
east, and such building material, for the wall, be compatible to the residences.

16. That within 30 days, landscaping be installed, including grass on the total site
with an appropriate water system. The Development Coordination Office, as
previously stipulated, is to approve the plan.

17. That if Item Nos. 15 and 16 are not done within the set time frame, these will be
considered zoning violations, subject to prosecution.

11. THE DEVELOPER SHALL RECORD A CROSS-ACCESS EASEMENT AND
COMMON DRIVEWAY AGREEMENT FOR PARCELS NOS. 1A AND 1B, AS
DEPICTED ON THE ILLUSTRATIVE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN DATE
STAMPED JANUARY 22, 2021, AND AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.




Page 201



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Modification of Stipulation Request for Ratification of March 17, 2021 Planning
Hearing Officer Action - PHO-4-21--Z-81-05-7(8) - Approximately 170 Feet East of
the Southeast Corner of 35th Avenue and Southern Avenue

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve Planning Hearing
Officer's recommendation without further hearing by the City Council on matters heard
by the Planning Hearing Officer on March 17, 2021. This ratification requires formal
action only.

Summary
Application: PHO-4-21--Z-81-05-7(8)
Existing Zoning: C-2
Acreage: 8.69

Applicant: Adam Baugh, Withey Morris, PLC
Owner: All Other Property LLP/ETAL
Representative: Adam Baugh, Withey Morris, PLC

Proposal:
1. Modification of Stipulation 1 regarding general conformance to the site plan date
stamped Sept. 23, 2005.
2. Modification of Stipulation 1.b limiting the maximum number of lots to 59.
3. Modification of Stipulation 2 regarding general conformance to elevations date
stamped May 26, 2005.
4. Modification of Stipulation 2.a requiring homes to include covered entrances.
5. Modification of Stipulation 4 requiring a landscaped entry feature.
6. Modification of Stipulation 5 regarding side yard setbacks on Lots 31 and 32.
7. Modification of Stipulation 6 regarding a 12-inch roof overhang.
8. Deletion of Stipulation 18 regarding right-of-way and a transit pad along Southern
Avenue.
9. Deletion of Stipulation 19 regarding right-of-way and a transit pad along 35th
Avenue.
10.Deletion of Stipulation 20 regarding right-of-way and a bus-bay along Southern
Avenue.
11.Modification of Stipulation 22 limiting minimum lot width to 50 feet.


Page 202

12.Technical corrections to Stipulations 3, 8, 9, and 16.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation: The Laveen Village Planning
Committee heard this case on March 15, 2021 and recommended approval with
additional stipulations, by a vote of 6-4.
Planning Hearing Officer Recommendation: The Planning Hearing Officer heard this
case on March 17, 2021, and recommended denial as filed and approval with
modifications and additional stipulations. Please see Attachment A for a complete list
of the Planning Hearing Officer's recommended stipulations.

Location
Approximately 170 feet east of the southeast corner of 35th Avenue and Southern
Avenue
Council District: 8
Parcel Address: 3435 W. Southern Ave.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 203
Attachment A- Stipulations- PHO-4-21--Z-81-05-7(8)

Location: Approximately 170 feet east of the southeast corner of 35th Avenue and
Southern Avenue

Stipulations:

General Conformance RESIDENTIAL

1. That THE development shall be in general conformance to WITH the site plan
date stamped MARCH 16, 2021 September 23, 2005, as modified by the
following STIPULATIONS, and as approved or modified by the PLANNING AND
Development Services Department:

a. That A shaded walkway shall be incorporated into the parking lot with
alternative paving materials where walkways cross drive aisles.

b. That The MULTIFAMILY residential DEVELOPMENT portion shall not
exceed 133 59 lots.

C. A MINIMUM OF 21 PERCENT OF THE GROSS PROJECT AREA SHALL
BE RETAINED AS OPEN SPACE, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

D. THE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE GATED.

E. ENCLOSED, PRIVATE, RESIDENTIAL GARAGES SHALL PROVIDE
PARKING SPACES WITH A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 20 FEET, AS
APPROVED OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.

F. THE VEHICULAR GATE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE
SHALL SUPPORT BOTH INGRESS AND EGRESS, AS APPROVED OR
MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

G. SPEED BUMPS OR ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE TRAFFIC CALMING
MEASURE SHALL BE USED FOR SPEED MITIGATION.

Residential

2. That THE development shall be in general conformance WITH to the residential
elevations date stamped MARCH 16, 2021 May 26, 2005, as modified by the
following STIPULATIONS, and as approved or modified by the PLANNING AND
Development Services Department.

a. That all homes shall include covered entrances, such as porches, archways,
or landscaped courtyards;

A. That The elevations shall incorporate four-sided architecture.
b.


Page 204
B. ALL BUILDING FACADES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 25 PERCENT
ACCENT MATERIAL.

C. BUILDING ROOFLINES SHALL PROVIDE ARTICULATION, DESIGN
ELEMENTS, OR SIMILAR FEATURES AT A MINIMUM SPACING OF 45
FEET.

3. THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE SETBACK ALONG SOUTHERN AVENUE
SHALL BE PLANTED WITH A MINIMUM 50 PERCENT 3-INCH CALIPER
TREES, AND MINIMUM 25 PERCENT 2-INCH CALIPER TREES.

4. That The common open space area shall provide active recreational elements,
3. such as tot lots and ramadas, as approved by the PLANNING AND
Development Services Department.

4. That a minimum 40-foot by 40-fot landscaped entry feature shall be provided on
both sides of the main entry into the residential development, as approved by
the Development Services Department.

5. That the side yard setback on Lots 31 and 32 provide a minimum of 20 feet
between buildings.

6. That all buildings must have a minimum 12-inch roof overhang.

5. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT A MINIMUM 5-FOOT-WIDE PUBLIC
SIDEWALK ALONG SOUTHERN AVENUE TO BE DETACHED WITH A
MINIMUM 13-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE AREA LOCATED BETWEEN THE
BACK OF CURB AND SIDEWALK, CONSISTENT WITH CROSS SECTION D,
AS IDENTIFIED ON THE STREET CLASSIFICATION MAP, AS APPROVED
OR MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
TREES IN THE LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL BE PLANTED NEAR THE
SIDEWALK TO PROVIDE THERMAL COMFORT FOR PEDESTRIANS, AS
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

6. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE A BICYCLE REPAIR STATION (FIX-IT-
STATION) ALONG THE NORTH PERIMETER PROPERTY LINE THAT IS
ACCESSIBLE AND VISIBLE FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK, AS APPROVED
BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

7. THE DEVELOPER SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 15 BICYCLE PARKING
RACKS OR BIKE LOCKERS, AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

Commercial

8. That The commercial buildings elevations shall be approved through the
7. Planning Hearing Officer process prior to preliminary site plan approval, with
specific regard to the following.

a. That The commercial structures shall have pitched roofs or pitched roof
elements.
Page 205
9. That A minimum 40-foot by 40-foot landscaped entry feature shall be provided at
8. the two ingress/egress points furthest from the intersection of 35th Avenue and
Southern Avenue, as approved or modified by the PLANNING AND
Development Services Department. The enhanced landscape feature shall
include a turf area and provide plant types from the following list:

a. Trees: pecan, Arizona ash, evergreen elm, heritage live oak, sycamore, or
other similar canopied trees;

b. Shrubs: myrtle (true, dwarf, and/or twisted), pomegranate, AZ yellow bells,
bush lantana, Mexican honeysuckle, primrose jasmine, or other similar
shrubs;

c. Accents: deer grass, wild sunflowers, penstemon, golden columbine, or
other similar accents;

d. Vines: White Lady Banks Rose, common trumpet creeper, coral vine, pink
trumpet vine, and primrose jasmine, or other similar vines.

10. That The retention area located at the southeast corner of the commercial
9. portion of the site SHALL incorporate an offset double row of 3 and 4-inch
caliper trees, spaced 20-feet on center, as approved by the PLANNING AND
Development Services Department.

11. That A landscape plan and a lighting plan shall be brought back to the Laveen
10. Village Planning Committee (LVPC) for review and comment prior to City
approval.

12. That THE development shall be subject to a comprehensive sign plan in
11. accordance with Section 705. The LVPC shall have the opportunity to review the
plan prior to the public hearing.

Street Transportation

13. That Right-of-way totaling 55 feet shall be dedicated for the south half of
12. Southern Avenue.

14. That Right-of-way totaling 55 feet shall be dedicated for the east half of 35th
13. Avenue.

15. That A 21-foot by 21-foot right-of-way triangle shall be dedicated at the
14. southeast corner of 35th Avenue and Southern Avenue.

16. That Sufficient right-of-way shall be dedicated to accommodate a bus-bay on
15. Southern Avenue at 35th Avenue.

17. That The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
16. development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals as per plans approved by the

Page 206
PLANNING AND Development Services Department. All improvements shall
comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

18. That The applicant shall complete and submit the Developer Project Information
17. Form for the MAG Transportation Improvement Program to the Street
Transportation Department. This form is a requirement of the EPA to meet clean
air quality requirements.

PUBLIC Transit

19. That Right-of-way shall be dedicated and a transit pad constructed (Detail
18. P1261) along eastbound Southern Avenue, east of 35th Avenue, as approved
by the Public Transit Department.

20. That Right-of-way shall be dedicated and a transit pad constructed (Detail
19. P1262) along northbound 35th Avenue, north of Alta Vista Road, as approved by
the Public Transit Department.

21. That Right-of-way shall be dedicated and a bus-bay (P1257) constructed along
20. eastbound Southern Avenue, east of 35th Avenue, as approved by the Public
Transit Department.

Other

22. That Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner shall record documents
21. that disclose to the purchasers of property within the development(s) the
existence and operational characteristics of Sky Harbor International Airport.
The form and content of such documents shall be reviewed and approved by the
City Attorney.

22. That the minimum lot width be 50 feet.

23. That Residential elevationS SHALL be brought back to the Laveen Village
Planning Committee for review and comment.

24. That One of the amenities shall be a club house or ramada, with lights and
seating for use by the Homeowners Association (HOA) for meetings.

25. That Any request to change or modify the stipulations or site plan, SHALL be
brought back to the Laveen Village Planning Committee for review and comment
prior to approval by the City.




Page 207



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application PHO-1-21_Z-36-
18-2 - Southeast Corner of Tatum Boulevard and Grovers Avenue (Ordinance G-
6837)

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve the Planning
Hearing Officer's recommendation without further hearing by the City Council on
matters heard by the Planning Hearing Officer on March 17, 2021.

Summary
Application: PHO-1-21_Z-36-18-2
Existing Zoning: R1-10, R-2
Acreage: 121.73

Applicant: Withey Morris, PLC
Owner: DR Horton, Inc.
Representative: Benjamin Tate, Withey Morris, PLC

Proposal:
1. Modification of Stipulation 3 restricting lots along Grovers Avenue and 52nd Street
to one-story and 15 feet in height.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation: The Paradise Valley Village
Planning Committee heard this case on March 1, 2021 and recommended approval,
by a vote of 14-3.
PHO Action: The Planning Hearing Officer heard this case on March 17, 2021 and
recommended approval. See Attachment A for the full list of Planning Hearing Officer
recommended stipulations.

Location
Southeast corner of Tatum Boulevard and Grovers Avenue
Council District: 2
Parcel Address: N/A




Page 208


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 209
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STIPULATIONS APPLICABLE TO
REZONING APPLICATION Z-36-18-2 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY
ORDINANCE G-6524.

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning stipulations applicable located at the southeast

corner of Tatum Boulevard and Grovers Avenue in a portion of Section 32, Township 4

North, Range 4 East, as described more specifically in Attachment “A”, are hereby

modified to read as set forth below.

STIPULATIONS:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan and
circulation plan date stamped August 10, 2018, except as modified by the
following stipulations and as approved by the Planning and Development
Department:

a. A minimum of 20% of the gross site area shall be retained as open space.

b. The concrete trail shall be a minimum of 8-feet in width.

2. Full view fencing shall be utilized along 52nd Street and Grovers Avenue where
common tracts abut the perimeter of the subdivision, adjacent to internal streets
and open space, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. All lots along Grovers Avenue and 52nd Street shall be limited to one story and
15 17 feet AND 6 INCHES in height, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.



Page 210
4. A minimum 25-foot landscape setback with minimum 2-inch caliper trees placed
20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings shall be provided along Grovers
Avenue and 52nd Street, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

5. The developer shall provide a minimum of two amenity areas. The amenity
areas shall be a minimum of one acre in size and provide at least three of the
following active recreational elements or other similar elements, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department:

a. Swimming pool

b. Tot lot

c. Barbecue and picnic areas

d. Game courts

e. Lawn or turf, putting green

f. Pavilions or ramadas

6. The single-family detached product shall comply with the Single-Family Design
Review standards, regardless of lot size as, outlined in Section 507.Tab
A.II.C.8.1 through 8.4 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance and as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

7. A shade tree shall be planted in every front yard within 10 feet of the sidewalk,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. The single-family detached and attached elevations shall incorporate the
following elements, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Every 20 linear feet on each story there shall be an architectural
embellishment, structural relief, window or similar, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

b. All windows shall either be recessed a minimum of 2 inches or have a
decorative pop-out at a minimum of 2-inches on all four sides of the home,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

c. Covered porches a minimum of sixty square feet in area shall be provided
in the front yard of 50% of the homes that are offered in the subdivision. No
porch shall terminate within the plane of a door or window.

9. The attached single-family development shall be in general conformance with
the Duplex Lot Staggering Exhibit, date stamped August 10, 2018, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.




Page 211
10. The developer shall dedicate a one foot Vehicular Non-Access Easement
(VNAE) along the eastern perimeter of the site, with an allowance for a
maximum of one, 20-foot wide emergency access point to 52nd Street, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

11. Right-of-way totaling 40 feet shall be dedicated for the south half of Grovers
Avenue for the first 150 feet east of Tatum Boulevard. Right-of-way tapering
from 40 feet to 30 feet shall be dedicated for the next 150 feet, with 30 feet of
dedication for the remainder of the street, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

12. Right-of-way totaling 40 feet shall be dedicated for the west half of 52nd Street
for the first 150 feet north of Bell Road. Right-of-way tapering from 40 feet to 30
feet shall be dedicated for the next 150 feet, with 30 feet of dedication for the
remainder of the street, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

13. A 20-foot right-of-way radius shall be dedicated at the southwest corner of
Grovers Avenue and 52nd Street, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

14. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

15. The applicant shall submit a Traffic Impact Study to the Street Transportation
Department and the Planning and Development Department prior to preliminary
site plan review. The applicant shall be responsible for any dedications and
required improvements as recommended by the approved traffic study, as
approved by Planning and Development Department and the Street
Transportation Department.

16. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Scottsdale Municipal Airport (SDL) to future
owners or tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents
shall be according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

17. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

SECTION 2. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district granted pursuant to Ordinance G-6524, this portion of the rezoning is now

subject to the stipulations approved pursuant to Ordinance G-6524 and as modified in


Page 212
Section 1 of this Ordinance. Any violation of the stipulation is a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Building permits shall not be issued for the subject site until

all the stipulations have been met.

SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 21st day of April, 2021.




________________________________
MAYOR



ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:

____________________________City Attorney



REVIEWED BY:

____________________________City Manager

Exhibits:
A - Legal Description (4 Pages)
B - Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 213
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PHO-1-21-- Z-36-18-2

TATUM & BELL ROAD
R1-10 ZONING
LEGAL DESCRIPTION

A portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 32, Township 4 North, Range 4 East of the
Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being more particularly
described as follows:

BEGINNING at a found brass cap in hand hole accepted as the South quarter corner of
said Section 32 from which a found brass cap in hand hole accepted as the Southwest
corner thereof bears North 89°35'07" West, 2641.00 feet;

Thence North 89°35'07" West, 1320.50 feet along the south line of said southwest
quarter;

Thence leaving said south line, North 00°03'45" West, 204.82;

Thence South 89°57'14" East, 160.94 feet;

Thence South 00°02'46" West, 9.16 feet;

Thence South 37°05'07" West, 29.77 feet;

Thence South 39°47'23" West, 7.02 feet;

Thence South 00°02'46" West, 91.50 feet;

Thence South 89°57'14" East, 420.00 feet;

Thence North 00°02'46" East, 91.50 feet;

Thence North 39°41'51" West, 7.02 feet;

Thence North 54°08'30" West, 40.61 feet;

Thence North 00°02'46" East, 254.16 feet;

Thence South 89°57'14" East, 15.00 feet;

Thence North 00°02'46" East, 180.00 feet;

Thence North 89°57'14" West, 25.00 feet;

Thence North 00°02'46" East, 372.98 feet;

Thence South 89°57'14" East, 135.66 feet;


Page 214
Thence North 00°02'46" East, 419.16 feet;

Thence North 89°57'14" West, 91.55 feet;

Thence South 48°09'05" West, 8.67 feet;

Thence South 49°45'12" West, 29.70 feet;

Thence South 00°02'46" West, 15.00 feet;

Thence North 89°57'14" West, 521.24 feet;

Thence North 00°02'46" East, 217.16 feet;

Thence North 89°57'14" West, 284.11 feet;

Thence North 00°02'46" East, 115.66 feet;

Thence North 89°56'42" West, 756.62 feet;

Thence South 00°02'46" West, 115.78 feet;

Thence North 89°57'14" West, 73.91 feet;

Thence North 39°21'24" West, 48.97 feet;

Thence North 89°57'14" West, 91.50 feet;

Thence South 00°02'46" West, 180.00 feet;

Thence South 89°57'14" East, 135.66 feet;

Thence South 00°02'46" West, 85.10 feet;

Thence North 89°57'33" West, 225.66 feet;

Thence North 00°03'00" West, 1320.43 feet along the west line of said Southwest quarter
to a found City of Scottsdale brass cap flush accepted as the West quarter corner of said
Section 32;

Thence South 89°57'14" East, 2639.73 feet along the north line of said Southwest quarter
to a found brass cap flush accepted as the Center of said Section 32;

Thence South 00°04'31" East, 2700.77 feet along the east line of said Southwest quarter
to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

The above described parcel contains a computed area of 4,222,690 sq. ft. (96.94 acres)
more or less and being subject to any easements, restrictions, rights-of-way of record or
otherwise.


Page 215
TATUM & BELL ROAD
R-2 ZONING
LEGAL DESCRIPTION

A portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 32, Township 4 North, Range 4 East of the
Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona, being more particularly
described as follows:

COMMENCING at a found brass cap in hand hole accepted as the South quarter corner
of said Section 32 from which a found brass cap in hand hole accepted as the Southwest
corner thereof bears North 89°35'07" West, 2641.00 feet;

Thence North 89°35'07" West, 1320.50 feet along the south line of said southwest
quarter;

Thence leaving said south line, North 00°03'45" West, 204.82 to the POINT OF
BEGINNING;

Thence South 89°57'14" East, 160.94 feet;

Thence South 00°02'46" West, 9.16 feet;

Thence South 37°05'07" West, 29.77 feet;

Thence South 39°47'23" West, 7.02 feet;

Thence South 00°02'46" West, 91.50 feet;

Thence South 89°57'14" East, 420.00 feet;

Thence North 00°02'46" East, 91.50 feet;

Thence North 39°41'51" West, 7.02 feet;

Thence North 54°08'30" West, 40.61 feet;

Thence North 00°02'46" East, 254.16 feet;

Thence South 89°57'14" East, 15.00 feet;

Thence North 00°02'46" East, 180.00 feet;

Thence North 89°57'14" West, 25.00 feet;

Thence North 00°02'46" East, 372.98 feet;

Thence South 89°57'14" East, 135.66 feet;

Thence North 00°02'46" East, 419.16 feet;


Page 216
Thence North 89°57'14" West, 91.55 feet;

Thence South 48°09'05" West, 8.67 feet;

Thence South 49°45'12" West, 29.70 feet;

Thence South 00°02'46" West, 15.00 feet;

Thence North 89°57'14" West, 521.24 feet;

Thence North 00°02'46" East, 217.16 feet;

Thence North 89°57'14" West, 284.11 feet;

Thence North 00°02'46" East, 115.66 feet;

Thence North 89°56'42" West, 756.62 feet;

Thence South 00°02'46" West, 115.78 feet;

Thence North 89°57'14" West, 73.91 feet;

Thence North 39°21'24" West, 48.97 feet;

Thence North 89°57'14" West, 91.50 feet;

Thence South 00°02'46" West, 180.00 feet;

Thence South 89°57'14" East, 135.66 feet;

Thence South 00°02'46" West, 85.10 feet;

Thence South 89°57'33" East, 1094.49 feet;

Thence South 00°03'45" East, 1167.14 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

The above described parcel contains a computed area of 1,080,044 sq. ft. (24.794
acres) more or less and being subject to any easements, restrictions, rights-of-way of
record or otherwise.




Page 217
Page 218



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-51-20-2 -
Approximately 4,000 Feet North of the Northeast Corner of Black Canyon
Highway and Jomax Road (Ordinance G-6838)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence District) to R-3A (Multifamily Residence District) for
single-family residential.

Summary
Current Zoning: S-1 (20.08 acres)
Proposed Zoning: R-3A (20.08 acres)
Acreage: 20.08 acres
Proposed Use: Single-family residential

Owner: Fred Bishop, et al
Applicant: Chuck Chisholm, K Hovnanian Homes
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq. Snell & Wilmer, LLP

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Deer Valley Village Planning Committee heard the case on March 11,
2021. No recommendation was made due to a lack of quorum.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard the case on April 1, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation with an additional stipulation,
by a vote of 7-0.

Location
Approximately 4,000 feet north of the northeast corner of Black Canyon Highway and
Jomax Road
Council District: 2
Parcel Addresses: 21602 N. 21st Ave., 27827 N. Black Canyon Highway, and 3002 W.
Oberlin Way




Page 219

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 220
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-51-20-2) FROM S-1 (RANCH OR FARM RESIDENCE)
TO R-3A (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 20.08-acre site located approximately 4,000

feet north of the northeast corner of Black Canyon Highway and Jomax Road in a

portion of Section 35, Township 5 North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically

in Exhibit “A”, is hereby changed from “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence District) to “R-

3A” (Multifamily Residence District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




Page 221
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The maximum building height shall be 30 feet.

2. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 285 units.

3. All elevations of the buildings shall contain architectural embellishments and
detailing such as textural changes, pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in
window size and location, and/or overhang canopies, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

4. A sidewalk and landscaping strip shall be provided along the Black Canyon
Freeway Frontage Road and shall be detached with a minimum five-foot-wide
landscape area located between the sidewalk and back of curb and planted to
the following standards, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

a. Minimum 3-inch caliper large canopy, single-trunk, shade trees placed a
minimum of 25 feet on center or equivalent groupings to provide a
minimum of 75 percent shade on adjacent sidewalks.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative groundcovers.

5. An enhanced landscaped entry shall be provided at the main entryway into the
development off of the frontage road with a minimum 300 square feet of
landscaped area on each side of the entrance. The landscaped areas shall be
planted and maintained with a variety of at least three different plant materials,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

6. A minimum landscape setback of 20 feet shall be required along the west
property line and along the frontage road. These landscape setbacks shall
include minimum 3-inch caliper large canopy shade trees planted a minimum
of 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department

7. A minimum landscape setback of 20 feet shall be required along the south
property line and shall include minimum 2-inch caliper trees planted a minimum
of 20 feet on center or in equivalent groupings, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

8. There shall be a minimum of two private open space amenity areas. Each area
shall provide, at a minimum, two of the following active amenity elements or
other similar elements, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department:




Page 222
a. Swimming Pool

b. Fire Pit

c. Pavilion or Ramada

d. Barbecue and Picnic Area

9. Perimeter walls adjacent to the frontage road and private drive to the north
shall incorporate stone veneer, stonework, integral color CMU block or faux
stone, and be compatible with the existing wall on the property line to the north,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

10. The developer shall submit a cross-access agreement prior to preliminary site
plan approval for APN 204-23-001A to support future cross-access of Oberlin
Way.

11. All frontage improvements, access control and location of driveways shall be
permitted and approved through ADOT.

12. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

13. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Deer Valley Airport (DVT) to future
owners or tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents
shall be according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

14. The developer must file FAA Form 7460 and provide City FAA’s no hazard
determination prior to construction permit approval, as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

15. The developer shall grant and record an avigation easement to the City of
Phoenix Aviation Department for the site, per the content and form prescribed
by the City Attorney prior to final site plan approval.

16. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.




Page 223
17. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

18. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

19. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 21st day of April, 2021.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:

____________________________City Attorney


REVIEWED BY:




Page 224
____________________________City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 225
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-51-20-2

A portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 35, Township 5 North, Range 2 East of the
Gila and Salt River Base and Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona being more
particularly described as follows;

COMMENCING at the North quarter of said Section 35; Thence North 89 Degrees 25
Minutes 16 Seconds East along the North line of said Northeast quarter a distance of
1492.67 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence North 89 Degrees 25
Minutes 16 Seconds East a distance of 420.06 feet; Thence South 12 Degrees 09
Minutes 55 Seconds East a distance of 1108.05 feet; Thence South 80 Degrees 07
Minutes 08 Seconds West a distance of 693.21 feet; Thence South 89 Degrees 25
Minutes 09 Seconds West a distance of 255.53 feet; Thence North 09 Degrees 52
Minutes 39 Seconds West a distance of 641.80 feet; Thence North 89 Degrees 25
Minutes 16 Seconds East a distance of 370.70 feet; Thence North 00 Degrees 34
Minutes 40 Seconds West a distance of 200.00 feet; Thence North 89 Degrees 25
Minutes 16 Seconds East a distance of 30.00 feet; Thence North 00 Degrees 34
Minutes 40 Seconds West a distance of 364.17 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

The above described parcel contains 19.224 acres (837390 sq. ft.), more or less




Page 226
Page 227



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-6-21-7 -
Southwest Corner of 35th Avenue and the Durango Street Alignment (Ordinance
G-6836)

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
-1 (Light Industrial District) to A-1 HGT/WVR (Light Industrial District, Height Waiver) to
allow a height waiver up to 110 feet for a mill tower at an existing processing facility.

Summary
Current Zoning: A-1
Proposed Zoning: A-1 HGT/WVR
Acreage: 0.36
Proposed Use: Height waiver up to 110 feet for a mill tower at an existing processing
facility

Owner: Procter & Gamble
Applicant: Procter & Gamble
Representative: Nick Wood, Esq./Noel Griemsmann, Snell & Wilmer, L.L.P.

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Estrella Village Planning Committee heard this case on March 16,
2021 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this case on April 1, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the Estrella Village Planning Committee recommendation
with an additional stipulation, by a vote of 8-0.

Location
Southwest corner of 35th Avenue and the Durango Street alignment
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 2050 S. 35th Ave.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.


Page 228
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN
(CASE Z-6-21-7) FROM A-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT) TO
A-1 HGT/WVR (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, HEIGHT
WAIVER).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 0.36 acre site located at southwest corner of

35th Avenue and the Durango Street alignment in a portion of Section 15, Township 1

North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is hereby changed

from “A-1” (Light Industrial District) to “A-1 HGT/WVR” (Light Industrial District, Height

Waiver) to allow a height waiver up to 110 feet.

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




Page 229
violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. A maximum building height of 110 feet shall be permitted, exclusive of Section
701.B height provisions in the Zoning Ordinance.

2. A system of clearly defined, accessible pedestrian pathways shall be provided
to connect building entrances via the most direct route for pedestrians, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

3. A portion of this parcel is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called
Zone AE Floodplain, on panels 2195L of the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)
revised September 21, 2020. If the proposed building is attached to an existing
building that is not shown to be FEMA compliant, it will be included in the
existing building’s floodplain restrictions and requirements, unless it can be
detached and placed outside of the FEMA floodplain. Alternatively, the larger
building can be shown by the applicant to be FEMA compliant with this building
addition. The following requirements are for buildings in special flood hazard
areas, as approved by the Planning and Development Department:

a. The Architect/Engineer is required to show the special flood hazard area
boundary limits on plans and ensure that impacts to the proposed
facilities and surrounding properties have been considered, following the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR
Paragraph 60.3). This includes, but is not limited to provisions in the
latest versions of the Floodplain Ordinance of the Phoenix City Code.

b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan needs to be submitted to the
Floodplain Management section of Public Works Department for review
and approval of Floodplain requirements prior to issuance of a Grading
Permit.

4. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX) to
future owners or tenants of the property. The form and content of such
documents shall be according to the templates and instructions provided which
have been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

5. The developer shall provide documentation to the City prior to construction
permit approval that Form 7460-1 has been filed for the development and that
the development received a “No Hazard Determination” from the FAA. If
temporary equipment used during construction exceeds the height of the
permanent structure a separate Form 7460-1 shall be submitted to the FAA and
a “No Hazard Determination” obtained prior to the construction start date.




Page 230
6. Developer to grant and record an avigation easement to the City of Phoenix
Aviation Department for the site, per the content and form prescribed by the City
Attorney prior to final site plan approval.

7. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

8. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in
the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 21st day of April, 2021.


________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:

____________________________City Attorney



REVIEWED BY:

____________________________City Manager

Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (1 Page)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)


Page 231
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-6-21-7


A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 1
NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY ARIZONA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15 MARKED
BY A BRASS CAP IN A HAND HOLE, THENCE SOUTH 00°07’06” EAST, 127.04
FEET TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4
BEARS SOUTH 00°07’06” EAST, 2492.71 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 89°52’52” WEST, 720.71 FEET TO THE POINT OF

BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00°07’08” EAST, 111.00 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 89°52’52” WEST, 140.00 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 00°07’08” WEST, 111.00 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89°52’52” EAST, 140.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;




Page 232
Page 233



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1212 (Ordinance G-6834)

Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1212. This amendment
reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions previously
approved by City Council with Z-116-D-81 and the entitlements are fully vested.

Summary
To rezone a parcel located approximately 466.00 feet south of the southwest corner of
the intersection of East Beverly Road and South Pointe Parkway
Application No.: Z-116-D-81
Zoning: C-O PCD
Owner: HRA Mountain Pointe LP, Mountain Pointe Office INV LLC, and RCH Mountain
Pointe LLC
Acreage: 4.46

Location
Approximately 466.00 feet south of the southwest corner of the intersection of East
Beverly Road and South Pointe Parkway
Address: 8211 S. 48th Street
Council District: 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 234
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY
OF PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING
OFFICIAL SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP 1212

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as
follows:

SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is

hereby amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1212 signed by the

Mayor and City Clerk, which is accompanies and is annexed to this ordinance and

declared a part hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 21st day of April, 2021.



_____________________________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:


_________________________ City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:




Page 235
_________________________ City Attorney


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________ City Manager




Page 236
Attachment B


OFFICIAL SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP NO. 1212 Sheet 1 of 1

ORDINANCE NO. AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE

Passed by the Council of the City of Phoenix, Arizona this 21st day of April 2021.




E BEVERLY RD




S 48TH S
S POINTE PKWY W


T

Page 237
C-O PCD*




A Portion of Z-116-D-81


ZONING SUBJECT TO STIPULATIONS: *
Drawn by: KS
_______ AREA INVOLVED BOUNDED THUS:



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption - Amend City Code - Rezoning
Application Z-41-20-3 (Honor Health Outpatient Medical Center - Shea PUD) -
Approximately 400 Feet West of the Northwest Corner of 54th Street and Shea
Boulevard (Ordinance G-6840)

Request to hold a public hearing on a proposal to amend the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning
Application Z-41-20-3 (Honor Health Outpatient Medical Center - Shea PUD) and
rezone the site from C-O (Approved PAD-2 SP) (Commercial Office, Approved
Planned Area Development, Special Permit) and PAD-2 (Approved PAD-2 SP)
(Planned Area Development, Approved Planned Area Development, Special Permit) to
PUD (Planned Unit Development) to allow a hospital and commercial uses.

Summary
Current Zoning: C-O (Approved PAD-2 SP) (0.12 acres) and PAD-2 (Approved PAD-2
SP) (3.07 acres)
Proposed Zoning: PUD (3.19 acres)
Acreage: 3.19 acres
Proposed Use: Hospital and commercial uses

Owner: 5316 East Shea Boulevard, LLC
Applicant: Wendy Riddell, Berry Riddell, LLC
Representative: Wendy Riddell, Berry Riddell, LLC

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard the case on Nov.
2, 2020 for information only. The Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee heard
the case on Feb. 1, 2021 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation,
with two additional stipulations, by a vote of 10-4-2.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard the case on March 4, 2021 and
recommended approval, per the Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
recommendation, with an additional stipulation, by a vote of 6-3. The City Council was
scheduled to ratify the Planning Commission approval on April 7, 2021 agenda,
however, Councilwoman Stark requested that the item be withdrawn from the agenda
in order to advertise the item for a public hearing on the April 21, 2021 Formal Council


Page 238

agenda.

Location
Approximately 400 feet west of the northwest corner of 54th Street and Shea
Boulevard
Council District: 3
Parcel Addresses: 5320 E. Shea Blvd.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Planning and
Development Department.




Page 239
ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-41-20-3) FROM C-O (APPROVED PAD-2
SP) (COMMERCIAL OFFICE, APPROVED PLANNED AREA
DEVELOPMENT, SPECIAL PERMIT) AND PAD-2
(APPROVED PAD-2 SP) (PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT,
APPROVED PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT, SPECIAL
PERMIT) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT).


____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 3.19 acre site located approximately 400 feet

west of the northwest corner of 54th Street and Shea Boulevard in a portion of Section

20, Township 3 North, Range 4 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is

hereby changed from 0.12-acres of “C-O (Approved PAD-2 SP)” (Commercial Office,

Approved Planned Area Development, Special Permit) and 3.07 acres of “PAD-2

(Approved PAD-2 SP)” (Planned Area Development, Approved Planned Area

Development, Special Permit) to “PUD” (Planned Unit Development).




Page 240
SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the HonorHealth Outpatient
Medical Center - Shea PUD reflecting the changes approved through
this request shall be submitted to the Planning and Development
Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request. The
updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped January 6, 2021, as modified by
the following stipulations:

a. Front Cover: Remove “HEARING DRAFT” and revise submittal
date information on bottom of the cover page as follows:
1st Submittal: July 29, 2020
2nd Submittal: October 14, 2020
Hearing Draft: January 6, 2021

b. Add parking standards to the comparative development standards
table.

c. Add standards for the detached sidewalk in the Development
Standards table as depicted on the landscape plan.

d. Provide a dimensioned landscape plan depicting distance
between sidewalk and back of curb at a 5-foot minimum, sidewalk
widths at a minimum of 5 feet wide and landscape setbacks.
Include caliper sizes of trees, number of shrubs under each tree,
groundcover percentages in a table format on the plan.

2. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps,
streetlights, median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per
plans approved by the Planning and Development Department. All
improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.




Page 241
3. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for
this development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until
the study had been reviewed and approved by the City. Additional off-
site improvements and right-of-way dedications may be required as
identified in the approved traffic study. Development shall be responsible
for the cost associated with these improvements and dedications.

4. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during
construction, the developer shall immediately cease all ground
disturbing activities within a 33-foot radius of the discovery, notify the
City Archaeologist, and allow time for the Archaeology Office to properly
assess the materials.

5. The developer shall construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Shea
Boulevard and 54th Street, as approved by the Street Transportation
Department.

6. The operator of this facility shall not contract with Emergency Medical
Services (“EMS”) to bring patients to the facility by ambulance with lights
and sirens (Code 3).

7. Prior to preliminary site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a
Proposition 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with
the Maricopa County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be
included in the rezoning application file for record.


SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 21st day of April 2021.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:




Page 242
____________________________City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:

____________________________City Attorney


REVIEWED BY:

____________________________City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (2 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




Page 243
EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-41-20-3

LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, OF THE GILA AND SALT
RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT CITY OF PHOENIX BRASS CAP IN HANDHOLE MARKING THE
SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, FROM WHICH A CITY OF
PHOENIX BRASS CAP IN HANDHOLE MARKING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
BEARS SOUTH 89 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
2638.35 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
OF SECTION 20, A DISTANCE OF 498.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
60.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF LOT SPLIT
“MOUNTAINSIDE FITNESS” RECORDED IN BOOK 1483, PAGE 7, RECORDS OF
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;

THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 21 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
40.11 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
94.31 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
65.25 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
45.24 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 02 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
294.64 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
267.48 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
343.28 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
107.50 FEET;



Page 244
THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 36 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF
56.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF LOT SPLIT
“MOUNTAINSIDE FITNESS” RECORDED IN BOOK 1483, PAGE 7, RECORDS OF
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;

THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF
60.00 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID
SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, A
DISTANCE OF 425.57 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 137,958 SQUARE FEET OR 3.167 ACRES, MORE OR
LESS.




Page 245
Page 246
Attachment B




Staff Report Z-41-20-3
HonorHealth Outpatient Medical Center - Shea PUD
January 25, 2021

Paradise Valley Village Planning February 1, 2021
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: March 4, 2021
Request From: C-O (Approved PAD SP) (Commercial
Office, Approved Planned Area
Development, Special Permit) (0.12 acres)
and PAD (Approved PAD SP) (Planned
Area Development, Approved Planned Area
Development, Special Permit) (3.07 acres)
Request To: PUD (Planned Unit Development) (3.19
acres)
Proposed Use: Planned Unit Development to allow a
hospital and other commercial uses
Location: Approximately 400 feet west of the
northwest corner of 54th Street and Shea
Boulevard
Owners: 5316 E Shea Boulevard, LLC
Applicant: Wendy Riddell, Berry Riddell
Representative: Wendy Riddell, Berry Riddell
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations


General Plan Conformity
General Plan Land Use Map Designation Residential 3.5 - 5 dwelling units/acre
Street Map Major
Shea Boulevard 60-foot north half street
Classification Arterial


STRENGTHEN OUR LOCAL ECONOMY CORE VALUE;
ENTERPRENEURS/EMERGING ENTERPRISES; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Encourage
land uses that promote the growth of entrepreneurs or new businesses in Phoenix
in appropriate locations.

Rezoning to PUD will support opportunities for new businesses to develop along a major
arterial street.



Page 247
Staff Report: Z-41-20-3
January 26, 2021



BUILD THE SUSTAINANLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREES AND SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLES: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.

The Honor Health Shea PUD proposes enhanced landscaping around the development
and internal landscaped areas. A detached sidewalk along Shea Boulevard includes
landscape areas with shade trees on both sides of the sidewalk to provide thermal
comfort for pedestrians.

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND
USE PRINCIPLE: Support reasonable levels of increased intensity, respectful of
local conditions and surrounding neighborhoods.

The proposed development will be compatible with the existing single-family residential
development to the north. The PUD requires enhanced landscape buffers and conditions
for potential emergency vehicle ingress/egress.

Applicable Plans, Overlays and Initiatives
Tree and Shade Master Plan – See background item No. 7
Complete Streets Guiding Principles – See background item No. 8
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan – See background item No. 9
Zero Waste PHX – See background item No. 10


Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
C-O (Approved PAD SP) and PAD
On Site Vacant
(Approved PAD SP)
North Single-family Residential PAD SP
South (across
Shea Multifamily Residential R-3A, R-2
Boulevard)
East Fitness Center PAD SP
C-O (Approved PAD SP) and P-1
West Commercial Office
(Approved C-O)




Page 248
Staff Report: Z-41-20-3
January 26, 2021


Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This is a request to rezone a 3.19-
acre property located approximately
400 feet west of the northwest corner
of 54th Street and Shea Boulevard.
The request is to rezone from C-O
(Approved PAD SP) (Commercial
Office, Approved Planned Area
Development-2 Special Permit) (0.12
acres) and PAD (Approved PAD SP)
(Planned Area Development,
Approved Planned Area Development
Special Permit) (3.07 acres) to PUD
(Planned Unit Development) to allow
a hospital and commercial uses.




Context Zoning Map, Source: City of Phoenix Planning and
Development Department
2. The subject site consists of one parcel that is under the ownerships of 5316 E Shea
Boulevard, LLC. The site is currently vacant. The subject site was annexed into the
area vastly consisted of vacant land. This area was rezoned in 1974 as a Planned
Area Development (PAD) comprised of 80 acres through Rezoning Case No. Z-64-74
and a concurrent special permit case, Z-SP-5-74, for a tennis club along the Shea
Boulevard frontage and a golf course. The golf course was not built within this Special
Permit area. In 1985 a portion of the site was rezoned to C-O through Rezoning Case
No. Z-133-85 to allow administrative office uses for the tennis club along the Indian
Bend Wash and Shea Boulevard. In 1986 an expansion of the tennis club and parking
area was
requested
through
Rezoning
Case No. Z-
SP-15-86.


Site History, Source: Maricopa County Historic Aerials




Page 249
Staff Report: Z-41-20-3
January 26, 2021


3. The General Plan Land Use
Map designation for the
subject site is Residential 3.5
to 5 dwelling units per acre.
The proposal is not consistent
with the General Plan Land
Use Map designation but is
consistent with current land
uses in the area. A General
Plan Amendment is not
required because the site is
less than 10 acres in size.

The General Plan Land Use
Map designation on all sides
of the subject parcel are also
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units per acre, with some
Residential 10 to 15 dwelling
units per acre south of the site
and Parks/Open Space –
Publicly Owned west of the
site.

General Plan Land Use Map, Source: City of Phoenix Planning
and Development Department


SURROUNDING ZONING AND USES
4. North
The area to the north of the subject site is a single-family subdivision by the name of
La Camarilla zoned PAD SP (Planned Area Development - 2, Special Permit). The
subdivision was platted in 1982.

South
Directly south of the subject site, across Shea Boulevard, are two two-story
multifamily developments named La Camarilla Villas Condominiums and Bella Terra
Condominiums. La Camarilla Villas Condominiums, located south and southwest of
the site, is zoned R-3A (Multifamily Residential District) through Rezoning Case No.
Z-180-87. Bella Terra Condominiums, located south of the site zoned R-2 (Multifamily
Residence District) through Rezoning Case No. Z-326-83.




Page 250
Staff Report: Z-41-20-3
January 26, 2021


East
Directly to the east of the
subject site is a fitness center
zoned PAD SP (Planned
Area Development, Special
Permit) approved through
PHO-2-18--Z-SP-15-86,
which modified stipulations in
the original special permit
rezoning case, allowing a
fitness center.

West
West of the subject site, are
two commercial office
buildings with one and two
story buildings zoned
C-O (Approved PAD SP)
(Commercial Office,
approved Planned Area Context Land Use Map, Source: City of Phoenix Planning
and Development Services Department
Development, Special Permit)
and PAD SP (Planned Area
Development Special Permit) and P-1 (Approved C-O) (Passenger Automobile
Parking, Limited, approved Commercial Office).


PROPOSAL
5. The proposal was developed utilizing the PUD zoning designation. The PUD is
intended to create a built environment that is superior to that produced by
conventional zoning districts and design guidelines. Using a collaborative and
comprehensive approach, an applicant writes a document proposing standards and
guidelines that are tailored to the context of a site on a case by case basis.

Where the HonorHealth Outpatient Medical Center - Shea PUD Development
Narrative is silent on a requirement, the applicable Zoning Ordinance provisions shall
be applied.

6. Below is a summary of the proposed standards for the subject site as described in the
attached PUD Development Narrative date stamped January 6, 2021. The proposed
standards were designed to allow for a commercial development that continues
enhancement along the Shea Boulevard corridor for a more pedestrian-friendly
environment and provides a thoughtful or appropriate transition from the adjacent
residential uses to the north of the subject site.




Page 251
Staff Report: Z-41-20-3
January 26, 2021


List of Uses
The Development Narrative proposes a hospital and land uses in C-O/M-O
(Commercial Office, Major Office option).

Prohibited Uses
The Development Narrative proposes restricting RV Parking and a helistop.
Prohibiting these uses helps to make this proposal more consistent with adjacent
commercial office and residential uses.

Conceptual Site Plan
The development’s main access points are along Shea Boulevard. The project
proposes a one-story, 18-foot tall commercial building with approximately 13,500
square feet of the building being utilized for urgent/emergency care and 11,500
square feet being utilized for physical therapy and primary care. The subject site
proposes 50 percent open space, which includes shaded pedestrian pathways and
enhanced landscaping. Shea Boulevard will contain an enhanced streetscape with a
detached sidewalk framed by landscape areas that will include trees, shrubs and live
ground cover. The
development narrative
does not call out the
dimension of the
detached sidewalk.
Staff is recommending
in Stipulation No. 1.a.
which requires a
minimum 6-foot-wide
detached sidewalk
along Shea
Boulevard. This is
consistent with the
approved Street
Source: Shepley Bulfinch
Classification Map
approved cross
section. The northern
property boundary
proposes a 100-foot
building setback, 30
foot landscape
setback and a double
row of multitrunked trees abutting Illustrative Landscape Plan, Source: Devenney Group
the northern property boundary,
which provides an enhanced
buffer between the proposed
use and existing single-family residential uses to the north.




Page 252
Staff Report: Z-41-20-3
January 26, 2021



Development Standards
The PUD development narrative proposes development standards based on the C-1
Zoning District. Several of the enhanced standards from the C-1 standards are in
relation to height, lot coverage, open space and building setbacks. All other
development standards are comparable.
The proposed maximum height of the project is 18 feet. The C-1 standards allow a
maximum height of 30 feet. Staff is supportive of the reduction in height due to the
close proximity of residential uses to the north.

The lot coverage proposed for the project is a maximum of 20 percent. The C-1
standards allow a maximum lot coverage of 50 percent. The reduction in lot coverage
allows more landscape areas to be incorporated on the site to serve as buffer areas
to the north and open space areas for employees and people visiting the site.

The proposed building setbacks
are 100 feet on the northern
boundary, 15 feet on the eastern
boundary, 40 feet on the
southern boundary and 50 feet
on the western boundary. The
PUD development narrative
proposes enhanced setbacks on
all sides of the property
compared to the C-1 zoning
standards.




Setback Exhibit, Source: Devenney Group

Landscape Standards
The Development Narrative includes increased landscape setbacks adjacent to the




Page 253
Staff Report: Z-41-20-3
January 26, 2021


existing residential uses to the north. Minimum landscape setbacks of 30 feet will be
provided along the northern property boundary whereas a 25-foot setback will be
provided along the Shea Boulevard property line on the south of the site. The Shea
Boulevard frontage will utilize existing trees in addition to replacement of three-inch
caliper trees along all the public right-of-way and new two and three-inch caliper trees
in all landscape areas. The developer shall install shrubbery and groundcover plants
in all landscape areas.
The streetscape along Shea Boulevard will include a detached sidewalk and minimum
three and four-inch caliper trees along the public right-of-way. This exceeds minimum
tree size requirements in the C-1 district. The landscaping will provide for a
pedestrian-friendly environment with 75 percent shade at maturity along the detached
sidewalk and 25 percent shade in the parking lot area.

Design Guidelines and Standards
The Development Narrative includes design standards that promotes four sided
architecture in an effort to create visual interest on all four sides of the building.
Design standards ensure that the building facade will blend with the natural desert
environment and contain a minimum of 33 percent of each building elevation include
integral color dimensional concrete masonry block with honed finish, stone tile, metal
paneling, glazing, exterior insulated finish system with reveal pattern or integral color
dimension concrete masonry block with smooth finish. The graphic below depicts the
quality architecture proposed in the PUD narrative.




Conceptual Elevation, Source: Devenney Group

The final elevations and building plans submitted to the City will incorporate the
provisions outlined in the development narrative and shall follow the Design
Guidelines of Section 507.Tab A of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

Parking Standards
The proposed parking is less than what is required by Section 702 of the Zoning
Ordinance. Staff is supportive of the reduction in parking as the developer has opted
to eliminate a row of spaces on the northern most boundary of the site due to the
close proximity of residential uses. Staff is recommending the development narrative
address specific standards, which is reflected in Stipulation No. 1.b. A double row of




Page 254
Staff Report: Z-41-20-3
January 26, 2021


trees will be planted between the parking lot and residential subdivision to the north in
an effort to create a greater buffer between the two uses. The PUD proposes a
minimum of one bicycle space per 25 parking stalls with a maximum of 50 spaces and
shall comply with Section 1307.H. of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

Fences/Walls
All site fences and walls will be consistent with Section 703.A of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance. In addition, the emergency generator, depicted on the Site Plan adjacent
to the proposed building, depicted on the Site Plan adjacent to the proposed building,
shall be screened by a minimum 11-foot wall.

Shade
The proposed shade standards require that a minimum of 75 percent of shade cover
be provided at maturity over the Shea Boulevard sidewalk. Further, 25 percent of the
parking lot shall be shaded, and 50 percent of all accessible public and private open
space areas shall be shaded.

Lighting Plan
All lighting will be consistent with the standards of Section 507 Tab A (Guidelines for
Design Review) and 704 (Environmental Performance Standards) of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance and Section 23-100 of the City Code. In addition, other restrictions
have been incorporated.

Emergency Vehicles
Emergency vehicles are not regulated by the City of Phoenix. However, the PUD
development narrative states that non-emergency patients may be transported to the
facility by ambulance without the use of lights and sirens. Emergency vehicles may
use lights and sirens for patients that require immediate transport, on occasion.

Signage
The proposed sign standards will comply with the Zoning Ordinance standards for
commercial development. In addition, the signage will be compatible with the project
design and signs shall not be located on the north side of the building.

Sustainability
The Development Narrative proposes several options to incorporate sustainability
principals including drought tolerant landscaping, vegetated parking lot and other
open space areas, which will reduce the heat island effect. The project also proposes
the utilization of low flow water fixtures among other features.

PUD Compatibility to Zoning Ordinance
The PUD proposes building setbacks that are comparable or greater than what is
required by the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance in the C-1 zoning district. Most notably, the
enhanced building and landscape setbacks, shade at 75 percent coverage at maturity




Page 255
Staff Report: Z-41-20-3
January 26, 2021


to increase pedestrian comfort and activity. Additionally, the building height is
restricted to 18 feet (28 feet at the top of the parapet). Enhanced protections for
abutting residential to the north include setbacks, enhanced landscaping buffers, and
a signage restriction on the site.

Phasing
The project will be constructed in one phase.

AREA PLANS, OVERLAY DISTRICTS, AND INITIATIVES
7. Tree and Shade Master Plan
The Tree and Shade Master Plan has a goal of treating the urban forest as
infrastructure to ensure that trees are an integral part of the city’s planning and
development process. In addition, a vision in the master plan is to raise awareness by
leading by example. The proposal includes a robust landscaped pedestrian walking
path along Shea Boulevard, open space areas and greater planting standards than
otherwise required by the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

8. Complete Streets Guiding Principles
In 2014, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding Principles.
The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an accessible,
safe, and connected transportation system to include all modes, such as bicycles,
pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. There is a proposed detached sidewalk adjacent to
the public street which provides a safer and more comfortable pedestrian experience.

9. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The Comprehensive Bicycle Master
Plan also supports options for both
short-and long-term bicycle parking
as a means of promoting bicyclist
traffic to a variety of destinations.
The proposal requires bicycle
parking spaces be provided on the
site. Bicycle racks shall be a
decorative design and installed per
the requirements of Section 1307. H.
of the Zoning Ordinance.

Source: Dero


10. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero-waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental




Page 256
Staff Report: Z-41-20-3
January 26, 2021


Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs.

Section 716 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage the
provision of recycling containers for multifamily, commercial and mixed-use
developments meeting certain criteria. The provision of recycling containers was not
addressed in the applicant’s submittals.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
11. At the time the staff report was written, staff has received 42 letters of opposition with
concerns related to the proposed use, line of site to existing residential, buffering,
proximity to residential uses, traffic, signage, lighting and noise generated from
emergency vehicles entering and exiting the site. The applicant has been working
with concerned neighbors to mitigate these concerns.

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
12. The Street Transportation Department has proposed stipulations requiring that all
streets within and adjacent to the development, shall be constructed with all
mandatory elements. In addition, no preliminary approval of plans shall be granted
until a Traffic Impact Study/Statement is reviewed and approved by the City. These
are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 2 and 3.

13. The Public Transit Department has proposed decorative pavers, stamped or colored
concrete, or other pavement treatments that visually contrast with the adjacent
parking and drive aisles surfaces be implemented. Additionally, it is recommended
that all building entrances and exits, and all public sidewalks be connected utilizing
the minimum possible distance and providing the most direct route. All cross-access
agreements shall incorporate a pedestrian pathway. Further, trees shall be placed to
provide 75 percent shade coverage on all pedestrian paths and sidewalks at full
maturity. Development standards within the Development Narrative prescribe
standards for pedestrian connectivity and shade. These are addressed within the
PUD narrative.

14. The Phoenix Fire Department has noted that they do not anticipate any problems with
this case and that the site and/or buildings shall comply with the Phoenix Fire Code.

15. The City of Phoenix Floodplain Management division of the Public Works Department
has determined that this parcel is not in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), but is
located in a Shaded Zone X, on panel 1755 L of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM) dated October 16, 2013.

16. The City of Phoenix Water Services Department has noted the property has existing
water and sewer mains that can potentially serve the proposed development.
However, there is potential need to up size existing water and sewer infrastructure




Page 257
Staff Report: Z-41-20-3
January 26, 2021


mains so that any remodels or new buildings will be able to meet domestic and fire
code requirements.

OTHER
17. The site has not been identified as being archaeologically sensitive. However, in the
event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all ground
disturbing activities must cease within 33-feet of the discovery and the City of Phoenix
Archaeology Office must be notified immediately and allowed time to properly assess
the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 4.

18. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and ordinances.
Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements. Other formal actions
such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments, may be required.

Findings

1. The proposed development provides additional protections for nearby residential uses
through site design and enhanced development standards.

2. The proposed development will provide a needed service in the area.

3. The proposed development contains enhanced standards that will result is a more
walkable, shaded and pedestrian-friendly environment that will help to reduce the
urban heat island effect.

Stipulations

1. An updated Development Narrative for the HonorHealth Outpatient Medical Center -
Shea PUD reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to
the Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of
this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped January 6, 2021, as modified by the following
stipulations:

a. Front Cover: Remove “HEARING DRAFT” and revise submittal date information
on bottom of the cover page as follows:
1st Submittal: July 29, 2020
2nd Submittal: October 14, 2020
Hearing Draft: January 6, 2021

b. Add parking standards to the comparative development standards table.




Page 258
Staff Report: Z-41-20-3
January 26, 2021


c. Add standards for the detached sidewalk in the Development Standards table as
depicted on the landscape plan.

d. Provide a dimensioned landscape plan depicting distance between sidewalk and
back of curb at a 5 foot minimum, sidewalk widths at a minimum of 5 feet wide
and landscape setbacks. Include caliper sizes of trees, number of shrubs under
each tree, groundcover percentages in a table format on the plan.

2. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

3. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study had
been reviewed and approved by the City. Additional off-site improvements and right-
of-way dedications may be required as identified in the approved traffic study.
Development shall be responsible for the cost associated with these improvements
and dedications.

6. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

Writer
David Simmons
January 26, 2021

Team Leader
Samantha Keating

Exhibits
Zoning Sketch Map
Zoning Aerial Map
Community Correspondence (69 pages)
HonorHealth Outpatient Medical Center - Shea PUD Development Narrative date stamped
January 6, 2021




Page 259
R1-18

R1-18 * 53RD ST 53RD WAY
PAD-2 *
Z-147-88 Z-SP-5-74
SAHUARO DR



RE-35
PAD-11*
Z-129-80 P-1 *
54TH ST
PAD-2
Z-89-86 C-O * SP *
C-O * Z-SP-15-86
Z-9-96
Z-133-85


SHEA BLVD




TOWN OF
R1-6 * R-3A *
Z-130-86
R-2 * R1-10 *
52ND ST
Z-321-85
Z-180-87 Z-128-89
Z-326-83

PARADISE VALLEY
CANNON DR




I
DEER VALLEY DR

SR 101 Z-41-20
UNION HILLS DR
Miles



A W P EAK PKWY (SR 51)
BELL RD
0.045 0.0225 0 0.045
PARADISE VALLEY VILLAGE
GREENWAY RD

THUNDERBIRD RD

CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3 CACTUS RD




SCOTTSDALE RD
SHEA BLVD
QU

16TH ST 56TH ST 64TH ST
24TH ST S

TATUM BLVD
32ND ST
40TH ST




APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Wendy Riddell, Berry Riddell
FROM:
C-O (Approved PAD-2 SP) ( 0.12 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. 8/06/2020
PAD-2 (Approved PAD-2 SP) ( 3.07 a.c.)
DATE:

Z-41-20 REVISION DATES:


GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
3.19 Acres QS 29-40 K-11 TO: PUD ( 3.19 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
C-O (Approved PAD-2 SP), PAD-2 (Approved PAD-2 SP) N/A (0), 3 (3) N/A (N/A), N/A (N/A)
PUD N/A N/A

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus Page 260
Document Path: \\one\pdd\Shared\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2020\Z-41-20.mxd
R1-18

R1-18 * 53RD ST 53RD WAY
PAD-2 *
Z-147-88 Z-SP-5-74
SAHUARO DR



RE-35
PAD-11*
Z-129-80 P-1 *
54TH ST
PAD-2
Z-89-86 C-O * SP *
C-O * Z-SP-15-86
Z-9-96
Z-133-85


SHEA BLVD




TOWN OF
R1-6 * R-3A *
Z-130-86
R-2 * R1-10 *
52ND ST
Z-321-85
Z-180-87 Z-128-89
Z-326-83

PARADISE VALLEY
CANNON DR




I
DEER VALLEY DR

SR 101 Z-41-20
UNION HILLS DR
Miles



A W P EAK PKWY (SR 51)
BELL RD
0.045 0.0225 0 0.045
PARADISE VALLEY VILLAGE
GREENWAY RD

THUNDERBIRD RD

CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3 CACTUS RD




SCOTTSDALE RD
SHEA BLVD
QU

16TH ST 56TH ST 64TH ST
24TH ST S

TATUM BLVD
32ND ST
40TH ST




APPLICANT'S NAME: REQUESTED CHANGE:
Wendy Riddell, Berry Riddell
FROM:
C-O (Approved PAD-2 SP) ( 0.12 a.c.)
APPLICATION NO. 8/06/2020
PAD-2 (Approved PAD-2 SP) ( 3.07 a.c.)
DATE:

Z-41-20 REVISION DATES:


GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO & ZONING MAP
QUARTER SEC. NO.
3.19 Acres QS 29-40 K-11 TO: PUD ( 3.19 a.c.)
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D. OPTION
C-O (Approved PAD-2 SP), PAD-2 (Approved PAD-2 SP) N/A (0), 3 (3) N/A (N/A), N/A (N/A)
PUD N/A N/A

* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus Page 261
Document Path: \\one\pdd\Shared\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2020\Z-41-20.mxd
David O Simmons

From: Alex Neville
Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2020 2:33 PM
To: kmw@berryriddell.com; David O Simmons
Subject: Proposed HonorHealth on Shea


Good afternoon,

I'm not sure if I will be able to attend the Zoom meeting so I am sending in my concerns ahead of time.

I've been a resident on Shea for the past 15 years, directly across from the proposed location of HonorHealth. Like many
parts of Shea Blvd, this is a very busy street. This particular section has notably bad traffic for several reasons:

1) The narrowing of westbound Shea at 56th St, forcing three lanes of rush hour traffic into two lanes.

This narrowing leads to many aggravated drivers and aggressive driving due to individuals not wanting to lose a single
spot in line, especially at the afternoon rush hour. It has forced inattentive drivers to cut over left a lane, oblivious to the
existing occupant of that lane, causing near crashes. At rush hour (during non‐COVID times), the traffic is solid
bumper to bumper from Tatum back to 56th Street, and further on some days.

2) Several driveways and intersections, including side streets, condominium developments and Mountainside Fitness

There is a lot to pay attention to here with locals trying to drive home, or turn out of their respective driveways onto
Shea. This will be more difficult with the increased emergency traffic of the proposed HonorHealth. Many of those
coming to HonorHealth may not be familiar with the driveways or the area and may not be able to focus on the traffic
coming from multiple directions as they try to find HonorHealth, especially as they are personally stressed with their
own emergency situations.

3) A bi‐directional center turn lane.

This in particular is a major concern. Many drivers treat this as a long merge lane, driving 200‐300 yards up the center
lane to merge into traffic. I've watched drivers get into this lane from in front of Mountainside Fitness to turn left onto
52nd St, which is about 300 yards. Other drivers come out of Bella Terra condominiums and make it all the way to the
light at 51st Place before merging. Drivers coming to Mountainside from the west will get into the merge lane as soon as
52nd Street so they can pass slower traffic in the left lane. This turns this center turn lane into a suicide lane with many,
many near accidents. There probably are logged accidents but I don't have access to those records.

I believe there is a major safety issue in bringing 24 hour emergency traffic to this section of Shea Blvd that is not
capable as currently engineered to safely handle that traffic. There are too many distractions, too many people coming
from different directions, and too many drivers sharing that turn lane as head on traffic.

Secondarily, the presence of Mountainside Fitness is more omnipresent than the prior occupant, La Camarilla
Tennis/Fitness. While we were made promises of how it would coexist, those promises do not appear to be kept. The
lights are brighter than before and they even have music playing outside 24 hours a day (in non‐COVID times). I cannot
sleep with a window open and not hear their music. This is not acceptable.

This location would be better served as professional or non‐emergency medical offices. If a 24 hour emergency location
is to be considered then major improvements must be provided on Shea Blvd, and the business must better conform to
the neighborhood environment with sound, light, etc. than has Mountainside Fitness.


Page 262
Sincerely,
Alex Neville
5249 E. Shea Blvd, Unit 101
Scottsdale, AZ 85254
480.389.4006





Page 263
David O Simmons

From: William Christian
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 10:40 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Honor Health Medical Center Zoning Chg Request Z-41-20


Hi David,

I missed your call yesterday. I’m the HOA President of North Phoenix Promontory, just to the southeast of this proposed
development. We have a lot of concerns about this project and I need some clarification on the upcoming Village
Planning Informational Meeting.

I went thru this process a couple years ago when Cachet Homes wanted a zoning chg for their Astoria residential
development. Thru the Village Planning Comm Hearing we were able to come up with a satisfactory compromise and it
was approved up the chain to the City Council. However, I never heard of this Informational Hearing before.

Some questions:

1- It is my understanding the Village Committee members listen and use this to help make their decision for when they
have their actual Committee hearing?
2- With #1 above in mind, are the opinions given here more important for one’s case than at the actual Village Planning
Comm Hearing?
3- If one wants to give their speaking time on 11/2 to someone else, how is that done in this virtual set-up?
4- Best guess as to when the Village Plan Comm Hearing will be? Before end of year? And will it be held virtually as well?
5- Last time I brought our Community signed petition to the Village Hearing. I take it now I will need to mail or email it
in?
6- When I research PUD zoning, under “Uses”, it says “ Appropriate limitations will be placed on the character and
intensity of permitted uses to promote neighborhood compatibility.” I would just like to confirm this is still the current
wording.

Finally, how do I get my email address added to the notification list? Right now it goes to our Block Watch person who
ends up forwarding to me.

Thanks for your help, David!

Bill Christian

Sent from my iPad





Page 264
David O Simmons

From: Bill Grove
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 11:42 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Honor Health rezoning Shea/54th st.


David,

I am a homeowner in La Camarilla Estates off of 54th St. I have followed the city’s handling of the Mountainside Fitness
project from start to finish. I have also followed the Honor Health proposal to construct adjacent to Mountainside.

I usually can go along with progress if dealt with in a fair and equitable manner. However, neither one of these projects
have done so. I am personally disappointed in how the city handled the Mountainside project and the project’s blatant
disregard to zoning requirements and laws. It almost seems to me as though the city turned a blind eye to what was
expected and what was not even disclosed in the planning to the city. I might also add that the developer continues to
ignore city guidelines. The individual is a bully and continues to act as such and in no way is concerned about this
neighborhood. I am also disappointed that the Honor Health development is taking on the same posture with the
Mountainside group involved from the start.

I implore you to do your civic duty and first of all require that Mountainside comply with signage lighting and do not
ignore the plea of this neighborhood in regards to the zoning of the Honor Health project. There are numerous locations
that this group could have considered for their project which would have benefited this area and been far less abusive
with lights and noises to residents than their choice here. There should also be concern over the amount of traffic on
Shea Blvd. that would be further impacted by this project.

Thank you in advance for your consideration.

Cheers,
Bill Grove

Sent from my iPhone





Page 265
David O Simmons

From: Bob King
Sent: Saturday, January 9, 2021 2:58 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Rezoning Case: HonorHealth Shea PUD is Z-41-20-3


David-

Below is the email I sent to Councilwoman Stark in December regarding the above referenced case. Please include this in
the Public Record and forward to the Village Planning Committee as appropriate.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Robert King
cell: 480-241-7521


----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Bob King
To: council.district.3@phoenix.gov
Sent: Saturday, December 5, 2020, 12:46:30 PM MST
Subject: Opposition to Phoenix Rezoning Case Z-41-20

Dear Councilwoman Stark -

I am writing to express my opposition to Phoenix Rezoning Case Z-41-20, and respectfully request that you join in this
opposition. This request pertains to the proposed Honor Health Medical Center on Shea, east of 56th Street, requiring a
rezoning from residential to commercial. My wife and I feel strongly that this rezoning for a 24/7 Urgent Care and
Emergency Room operation is not compatible with our neighborhood. This neighborhood was severely impacted by the
construction of the huge Mountainside Fitness facility which replaced La Camarilla; the construction of this Medical Center
will cause even greater permanent irreparable harm.

Thank you in advance for your support.

Robert and Patricia King
10213 N. 55th Street
cell: 480-241-7521





Page 266
David O Simmons

From: Council District 3 PCC
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 10:37 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: FW: rezoning case Z-41-20


Forwarding…


Raquel Estupinan
Chief of Staff
Councilwoman Debra Stark’s Office
Main: 602-262-7441

From: Raneeduckie
Sent: Saturday, December 5, 2020 10:13 AM
To: Council District 3 PCC ; ALieberman@azleg.gov
Subject: rezoning case Z-41-20


I am a resident of North Phoenix Promontory, my husband and I, along with all of the
surrounding neighborhoods are strongly opposed to Rezoning Case No. Z-41-20, the
HonorHealth Medical Center with 24/7 Urgent Care and Emergency Room Operations.

The current PAD zoning at this location, in accordance with City Municipal Code Sec
635, was designed to “provide a desirable and stable environment in harmony with that
of the surrounding area.” Contrary to this, the planned development is utterly out of
harmony with the character of the original zoning. Rezoning of a residential parcel
for a 24/7 Emergency Room could not be a more jarring replacement of the
idyllic tennis club that was previously zoned for this land.

Additionally, this rezoning proposal does not meet the City’s usage requirements for
this area. PUD Sec 671 states: “Appropriate limitations will be placed on the character
and intensity of permitted uses to promote neighborhood compatibility.” 24/7 Urgent
Care and Emergency Room operations, increased ambulance service, increased
traffic, associated late-night noises and lighting, are simply incompatible with the
character of a residential neighborhood.

This rezoning is particularly unnecessary given the existence of an obvious
compromise: Honor Health should simply be encouraged to find a nearby property that
is already correctly zoned. As more and more big-box chain stores inevitably close,
there will be multiple commercial properties available in the vicinity, either now or in the
near future. This would allow HonorHealth to provide its services while also preserving
the character of our neighborhood.


Page 267
We respectfully request that this rezoning case be categorically denied.


Respectfully signed

Charles Duckworth

*******





Page 268
David O Simmons

From: Dianne Hampton
Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 9:57 PM
To: dhampt@a.com; David O Simmons
Cc: Geno Koman; docroc@cox.net
Subject: Re: Paradise valley village nov 2 @6pm - Addendum to my written opposition


Good evening David,

As follow up to this evening’s Rezoning agenda item, overview, and discussion: HonorHealth Outpatient Medical Center-
Shea PUD, I am requesting my additional concerns be apart of the record for my written opposition to the proposed
building of the ER.

Alternative site recommendations offered by several speakers this evening included consideration of vacant buildings
located at PV Village Center (PVVC), ie., currently vacant Albertsons Store, Bed, Bath and Beyond (proposed closing),
etc. Please DONOT build at this location.

This immediate area is densely populated by retailers, homes, and condominium properties, ie., Milano Terrace, Tuscany
Villas, and Village at Stone Creek, etc.

Although, Milano Terrace has not rendered a formal position, many of its condo owners do not want the proposed ER
Center built on E. Shea Blvd. nor at PVVC. In past years, condo owners and residents have raised a myriad of problems
with PVVC management. Building the ER will potentially exacerbate problems.

The HOA’s, condo owners and entities adjacent to the area must have a viable opportunity to express their concerns,
which in cases mirror Dr. Rockowitz and others speaking this evening in opposition to the rezoning.

As I listen to Agenda Item 4: Z-14-20-2, it is ironic that communication with HOA’s can be problematic in the planning
process. Thus, limiting valuable feedback.

Again, I want to go on record registering my OPPOSITION to REZONING AND BUILDING THE HONORHEALTH OUTPATIENT
MEDICAL CENTER-SHEA.

David, know how much your hard work is appreciated. And, Dr. Rockowitz, many thanks for your advocacy.

Best,
Dianne Hampton, Condo Owner
Milano Terrace
5122 E Shea Blvd., Unit 1068
Scottsdale, AZ 85254
202-746-3317 iphone




Sent from my iPhone


Page 269
Dianne Hampton

On Oct 27, 2020, at 12:33 PM, dhampt@aol.com wrote:


Hello Mr. Simmons,

I am a condo owner in Milano Terrace, who is strongly against rezoning the land adjacent to Mountainside Fitness on E.
Shea Blvd., to accommodate Honor Health Care's proposed project for a 24/7 Emergency Center. Currently the land is
zoned as PAD-2, a residential classification that is congruent with this densely populated area of single family homes and
condominiums.

Additionally, traffic on E. Shea Blvd. is already extremely heavy, making it difficult for residents and guests to enter and
exit homes and condos adjacent to the area. Rezoning the land to PUD will exacerbate the problems we currently
face. Increased noise (sirens), traffic, pollution, etc., will impede the quality of life for residents and lead to property
value reduction.

Please register me to participate in the Village Planning Committee meeting on November 2, 2020 at 6pm. I am
requesting to speak and share my objection to the proposed rezoning project but will donate my allotted time to Dr.
Neal Rockowitz.

I look forward to receiving your confirmation and to participating in the meeting.

Thank you,
Dianne Hampton, Owner
5122 E Shea Blvd., Unit 1068
Scottsdale, AZ 85254



-----Original Message-----
From: neal rockowitz, md
To: 'Dianne Hampton'
Sent: Tue, Oct 27, 2020 11:18 am
Subject: FW: Paradise valley village nov 2




From: David O Simmons
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 1:04 PM
To: neal rockowitz, md
Cc: Geno Koman
Subject: RE: Paradise valley village nov 2

Good afternoon, Neal,

The case is going to Village for Information Only. This is an opportunity for surrounding stakeholders to express their
support or concerns for the case. If you would like to speak please reply to this email as this will serve as a formal
request to speak to agenda item no. 3. Geno Koman will then send you a link to access the meeting as a
participant. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Email is the best point of contact for me as I am
teleworking and don’t check voicemail messages as often as email.


Page 270
Respectfully,

David Simmons, MA
Planner II* Village Planner
200 West Washington Street
3rd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
602-262-4072
david.simmons@phoenix.gov



From: neal rockowitz, md
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 10:56 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Paradise valley village nov 2

Hi david
I am a concerned citizen regarding the Honorhealth proposed project at 54th st/Shea. Is the Nov 2 meeting
informational only? Is it designed to hear input from neighboring residences? I left a voicemail without return call.
Thx
nr



From the desk of
Neal L. Rockowitz, MD










Page 271
David O Simmons

From: Rica Carotenuto
Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 4:33 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Stop the ER project Shea Blvd


I understand that you want to hear from residents surrounding Mountainside Fitness and the proposed ER facility. My
husband and I are such residents (5420 E Shea) who oppose the construction of the ER. We also contend that
Mountainside violates zoning/building ordinances. My husband and I have signed the petition to block this project.

Thank you,

Enrica Carotenuto
Pasquale Carotenuto
Sent from my iPhone





Page 272
David O Simmons

From: Council District 3 PCC
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 10:38 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: FW: Please listen to our pleas..... regarding the Phoenix Rezoning Case Z-41-20.


Forwarding…


Raquel Estupinan
Chief of Staff
Councilwoman Debra Stark’s Office
Main: 602-262-7441

From: Helene Spero
Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 7:19 PM
To: Council District 3 PCC
Subject: Please listen to our pleas..... regarding the Phoenix Rezoning Case Z-41-20.

Good Afternoon. I live at 5403 E, Cannon Drive 85253 in the North Phoenix Promontory subdivision.
My husband and I attended the virtual meeting that your council held regarding this proposed
I personally listened to the virtual board meeting as both
zoning change.
sides presented. Many of them were things that I had not thought
about.

One man who spoke said he had been in his house for over
forty years and he remembers when Scottsdale Airport came to
the neighborhood
wanting to build their small airport. The neighborhood ended up
granting
them their support. The problem is that once any of these groups receive their change in
zoning, there is no one to watch
over them to make sure that they keep their promises to the neighborhood. He went on to
say, who then would have thought
that this tiny airport would turn into a hub for private jets and place us right in their flight
pattern!!

In applying this to Honor Health, they say that right now they aren’t
planning to have any helicopters but once they get their zoning
change,


Page 273
there isn’t anyone that will supervise them and before you know it, right in the middle of
our residential area we will
have sirens during all hours of the night and eventually helicopters landing right in the
middle of our once million dollar homes. Our homes are our
greatest asset, please don’t let them come in here and reduce the value and the
desirability of our homes. It will have a domino affect…. our homes
are our retirement funds. We will become a drain on our system in every way when our
money is devalued.

It was also brought up that with so many businesses closing, Honor could have it’s
choice of property already zoned
for commercial use. Albertsons, Bed, Bath and Beyond, Paradise Valley Mall and the list
goes on are all available properties that already have the commercial zoning.
It makes sense that they use one of these properties instead of coming into a residential
area. Take a minute and think about how you would feel if this
was being proposed in your neighborhood. Would you want this coming in next door to
you?

We all know that the traffic on Shea is already a huge problem. Anyone driving on it
around 3 in the afternoon and beyond, can witness the congestion that takes place during
the weekdays every afternoon. Not only does it add to the pollution around us but it adds
noise and inconvenience as well. Our country is facing so many
problems already, do we really need to add another one? We are the ones who saved
and put into the system. Corporate greed needs to be stopped. The citizens of this
country deserve to be heard. There is absolutely no reason why they can’t adapt the tons
of commercial sites that are available to them.

Thank you for your attention, your time, and your efforts on our behalf. I wish your
family and you a healthy and happy holiday season.
Please make mine the same by not allowing Honor Health to come into our residential
neighborhood.

Sincerely,

Helene B. Spero
*******





Page 274
David O Simmons

From: Jeremy Goodman
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 7:12 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Public Comment on Z-41-20-3


Re: Z-41-20-3
Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee
Public Meeting, November 2, 2020
Item #3

Dear Mr. Simmons,

I would like to register the strongest possible objection to the request to rezone 3.19 acres located approximately 400 feet
west of the northwest corner of 54th Street and Shea Boulevard from C-O, approved PAD-2 SP and PAD-2, approved
PAD-2 SP to PUD to allow a hospital and other commercial uses.

I own a home one street north of the planned hospital/24-hour hybrid outpatient medical center. I have a personal and
vested interest in the rezoning of the indicated property.

I object to the proposed rezoning and planned use for the following reasons:

1. The planned use for this property is inconsistent with the intention of the original zoning.
2. The change in zoning will allow for other unwanted and unsightly property use if the proposed hospital/24-hour
hybrid outpatient medical center is not built.
3. There are already at least 3 urgent care centers on Shea Blvd bounded by Tatum and Scottsdale Roads.
4. The proposed structure for the newly re-zoned area is inconsistent with the aesthetic of the area, will be unsightly,
and reduce property values for the homes surrounding the area.
5. The Mountainside Fitness building is unsightly and inconsistent with the aesthetic of the area, and an adjacent
commercial building will further degrade the neighborhood aesthetic.
6. The increase in traffic, including ambulance traffic, will increase noise levels, traffic and congestion, and will
decrease the safety of neighborhood pedestrians and cyclists who traverse this area. This planned use presents a
clear and present danger to the safety of the neighborhood.

I join my neighbors in strenuously opposing this rezoning request, and respectfully urge the committee to consider the
profoundly negative impact such a rezoning will necessarily have on the surrounding neighborhoods.

Sincerely yours,

Jeremy Goodman
5302 E Sahuaro Drive
Scottsdale, AZ 85254





Page 275
David O Simmons

From: Jonathan Miller
Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 11:59 AM
To: Debra W Stark
Cc: David O Simmons; Alan Stephenson
Subject: PROPOSED ER/UC AT 54TH AND SHEA


Debra
I have lived in the neighborhood for 15 years and raised my children here
We live at Cannon and 54th, only ½ mile or less across the street
We drive this section of Shea Blvd daily if not multiple times

We saw the destruction of the La Camarilla, where my children learned to swim, play tennis and vote
While I understand that “progress” cannot allow us to hold on to the past
The MONSTROSITY that was build is not what was intended when the area was zoned, it has created traffic as well as an
eyesore for the Paradise Valley community.

The proposed ER/UC next to the mountainside site is not warranted wanted or within the zoning to my understanding
In no way should the zoning change to allow another non “residential” complementary structure
In addition to Traffic, Noise and Lighting concerns, the slow denigration of the zoning will allow future destruction of our
neighborhood

While Honor Health claims that this is the ONLY place they can put such a structure, amazingly they now have partnered
up with the Urgent Care at the corner of Tatum and Shea, which now holds 2 EMPTY big box stores (Albertsons and Bed
Bath and Beyond)

That shopping center has access from all 4 sides (yes there is actually a street that runs behind there to cut the corner)
There is ample parking and seems like a much better location that my back yard.
While I am not a city planner, it just makes no sense to put an Urgent Care/Emergency room in my backyard when there
is plenty of space ½ mile away
The traffic on Shea is horrible at times between Tatum and 56th street, and we don’t need more

Hope that my input helps


Stay Healthy and Safe
Thanks

jm
Jonathan Miller CPA PC
StarCross Management LLC
Office 602‐535‐1197
My Office Address:
5010 E Shea Blvd Suite 140
Scottsdale AZ 85254
Mobile 602‐820‐2220
FAX 602‐297‐6608




Page 276
To set up an appointment You can schedule an appointment online at https://secure.scheduleonce.com/MillerJCPA
[secure.scheduleonce.com] OR if you cannot find a time that works, please call 602‐535‐1197 and speak with my
assistant Lise

To upload FILES to my secure portal ‐ Guest Exchange
https://millerjcpa.securefilepro.com/portal/#/login [millerjcpa.securefilepro.com]

My SECURE Mailing Address
10645 N Tatum Blvd
Ste 200‐608
Phoenix AZ 85028
Email Jmiller@millerjcpa.com
www.millerjcpa.com [millerjcpa.com]
www.starcrossllc.com [starcrossllc.com]
Pay your bill ONLINE at www.MillerJCPA.com [millerjcpa.com]

My new book "WAIT, Don’t Sign the Contract" now available on Amazon.
https://www.amazon.com/Wait‐Dont‐Sign‐That‐Contract‐ebook/dp/B07R689HYX [amazon.com]

Find out more
www.millerjcpa.com [millerjcpa.com]
www.starcrossllc.com [starcrossllc.com]
www.beyondthegamefilm.com [beyondthegamefilm.com]
www.thejust1project.org [thejust1project.org]


This e‐mail (including any attachments) contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION protected by federal
and/or state law and is intended only for the use of the individuals or entities designated as recipients. The information
contained within this e‐mail should not be construed as tax advice. If you are not an intended recipient of the e‐mail,
you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this e‐
mail is strictly prohibited. Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient does not constitute a waiver of any
applicable privilege.





Page 277
David O Simmons

From: Kaelee Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 1:17 PM
To: David O Simmons; Gary David
Subject: RE: Honor Health zoning change, Z-41-20


Gary,
David forwarded your email to me. I would like to introduce myself. My name is Kaelee Wilson and I am a planner with
Berry Riddell.

Do you mind explaining which Albertson's shopping center? The development team searched properties for quite
sometime for the appropriate location. I would be more than happy to set up a call between you, myself and Wendy
Riddell to discuss further.

Thanks,


Kaelee Wilson
Planner
BERRY RIDDELL LLC
6750 E. Camelback Road | Suite 100 | Scottsdale, AZ 85251
505‐328‐6606 | 480‐385‐2757 fax | kmw@berryriddell.com This message and any of the attached documents contain
information from Berry Riddell LLC that may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you
may not read, copy, distribute, or use this information, and no privilege has been waived by your inadvertent receipt. If
you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e‐mail and then delete this
message. Thank you.



‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
From: Gary David
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 2:59 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Re: Honor Health zoning change, Z‐41‐20

David, Thanks for the quick reply. We were discussing here and wondered why the Albertsons location wasn’t under
consideration? Wouldn’t that make more sense as far as location and congestion? Thanks again, Gary David

Sent from my iPad

> On Aug 10, 2020, at 4:40 PM, David O Simmons wrote:
>
> Mr. & Ms. David,
>
> Thank you for reaching out in regard to Rezoning Case No. Z‐41‐20, Honor Health Outpatient Medical Center‐Shea
PUD. Your concerns have been noted and added to the case file to be included as part of the public record. I have also
forwarded your email to the applicant (cc'd here) as well as to the members of the Paradise Valley Village Planning
Committee so they are aware of your concerns. This case has not been scheduled for public hearings.



Page 278
> Staff does not have a position on the case as of yet. We will not have a recommendation until we have a hearing draft
of the development narrative. We are currently in the first review cycle. Once we have a hearing draft, I will be able to
draft the staff report with a staff recommendation and schedule public hearing dates for recommendation.
>
> The applicants narrative is available for review on the City's website:
> https://www.phoenix.gov/pdd/planning‐zoning/pzservices/pud‐cases
>
> Please let me know if you have additional comments or concerns.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> David Simmons, MA
> Planner II* Village Planner
> 200 West Washington Street
> 3rd Floor
> Phoenix, AZ 85003
> 602‐262‐4072
> david.simmons@phoenix.gov
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
> From: Gary David
> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 1:58 PM
> To: David O Simmons
> Subject: Honor Health zoning change
>
> We just received notice of the proposed zoning change. My wife and I are owners at Bella Terra and we would like to
know how the increased traffic is going to be handled. Our driveway is already a nightmare with the normal Shea traffic
flow. The addition of the fitness center across the street has made the access even more treacherous. With the hospital
and ambulance service addition is there going to be a stoplight added to the street at this location? Or just a wrecker on
standby? Gary and Joan David
>
> Sent from my iPad





Page 279
David O Simmons

From: Council District 3 PCC
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 10:36 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: FW: Phoenix Rezoning Case Z-41-20.


Good morning David,

Hope you had a nice weekend. I’m going to forward you a few emails we received over the weekend regarding the
Honor Health case.

Best,

Raquel Estupinan
Chief of Staff
Councilwoman Debra Stark’s Office
Main: 602-262-7441

From: Larry Spero
Sent: Saturday, December 5, 2020 6:28 PM
To: Council District 3 PCC
Subject: Phoenix Rezoning Case Z-41-20.

It is with extreme concern that I send you this email. I live at 5403 E. Cannon Drive, North Phoenix Promontory Homes,
85253. I listened to
the virtual meeting held on this case. I heard Honor Health present their case and then I heard many people from my
neighborhood speak and
present their feelings, They made so many outstanding points and observations, I can not imagine after hearing their
presentations that you
would pass the Phoenix Rezoning Case Z-41-20.
We are homeowners in the area and we feel strongly that adding an Urgent Care and Emergency Room
that will be open 24/7 hours will
attract more people from all over at all hours, increasing late night traffic and noise. Shea is already handling a
lot of traffic and rush hour starts at
three o’clock in the afternoon and traffic is bumper to bumper. The only way they will be able to reach
this facility is by using their siren.
Who wants a siren in their bedrooms or home? This property is zoned for a neighborhood
friendly and absolutely should not be
changed to 24/7 commercial zoning which is not compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhoods.
Once this facility is built, it will grow. Once they have their commercial zoning in hand, they will need to
increase the size . They will do so by
adding on. and taking the building closer to Shea. They will begin to build up . Eventually they will make it a
trauma center and helicopters
will provide transportation to those who need emergency care. Is there anything wrong with this picture as this
emergency room increases
in size and in handling their patients? Absolutely not and we all would support creating this facility just not by
changing the zoning of this property.
There is no reason why with all the commercial property available in our area that Honor Health needs to
invade a residential neighborhood. More and


Page 280
more commercial property is unfortunately becoming available with the passing of each day as the virus
continues to close businesses. Please
encourage Honor Health to choose a piece of property that is already zoned for their needs.
We are of course upset. This facility will devalue our property. It will increase the noise, affect
the environment and bring in more people.
Our neighbors saved and saved in order to afford our location. Most of us paid top dollar for our
property. Please don’t rezone this
property and take our investments and our life style, that we paid dearly for, and change it all with the rezoning
case Z-41-20 especially when
this organization has so many other options.
Thank you for listening to me and hopefully rejecting this rezoning.
Sincerely,
Larry R. Spero


*******





Page 281
David O Simmons

From: LDLMSL
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 2:20 PM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Larry Langford; docroc@cox.net
Subject: PV Village Planning Committee Request



This requests speaking time at the Monday 11/2/20 rezoning hearing for Paradise Valley Village Planning
Committee agenda item #3 (The Honor Health Medical Center).

I am opposed to the rezoning but I will not be available to speak; instead, this requests that my allotted time
be donated to Neal Rockowitz M.D.

Confirmation of this request would be appreciated.

Larry Langford
10811 North 52nd Street
Scottsdale, Az. 85254
480-443-1968
ldlmsl@cox.net





Page 282
David O Simmons

From: Leslie Lewis
Sent: Friday, January 8, 2021 1:11 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Project near 55th Place and Shea


Hi - I am writing regarding the proposed HonorHealth Medical Center rezoning request near Shea and 54th Street. I
live in the Promontory neighborhood, across from the relevant site, along with my husband and children. We have
raised four children in this neighborhood, and there are some details about this area that must be considered in regards
to this rezoning case (Z-41-20).

We moved into the Promontory neighborhood when my children were very young (age 5 months to 9). I wanted to be in
a good school district for the children, and after significant research, decided that the Scottsdale district would be a
good fit. I graduated from Chaparral myself, and loved the idea of being in the same district while raising my children.
We really loved Cherokee Elementary and Sequoia Elementary, but the houses in the 85253/85254 area codes are not
cheap. However, the Promontory area and the area just north of Shea and 56th Streetare more affordable than the
PV/Scottsdale proper addresses, and so we bought in this neighborhood and sent our kids to Cherokee.

We are not the only ones who have had this idea. These neighborhoods are FILLED with children, teenagers, pets, and
parents walking babies. They are wonderful neighborhoods. The only real issue with them is that Shea Blvd, in this
area, is a nightmare. Cars drive by this stretch at 60-70 mph on a regular basis. I have never seen a police officer police
this area in the 15 years I have lived here. It is extremely difficult to make a left onto Shea from these areas (the ongoing
jokes about suicide turns are alarming). And there are SO many teenage drivers navigating this area.

Adding a Medical Center to an already dangerous area of Shea, in an area where young families are raising children, is
not only irresponsible. It is going to significantly increase the chance that children or young adults will die. This is not an
appropriate area for this Center. It is not fair to the families that live here. And it is not fair to the children.

If this rezoning does happen, please please please require a traffic light or two in this area. A light at 54th Streetwould
greatly help with the turns onto Shea from these family neighborhoods, and would also slow traffic.

Thank you for reading this. This rezoning would change the character of the neighborhood, and that would be a shame.
But the real reason that this rezoning is a problem is that it could lead to fatalities. Please don't allow this.

Leslie Lewis
10214 N. 55th St.
Paradise Valley, AZ. 85253
480-773-4193





Page 283
David O Simmons

From: Council District 3 PCC
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 9:30 AM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Raquel Estupinan; Rose Ferguson
Subject: Leslie Lewis - Phoenix Rezoning Case Z-41-20


Good morning David,

I wanted to share Mr. Lewis email that has suggestions if the re-zoning is approved for Honor Health. Please see below.

Best,
Adam Grant
Council Aide to Councilwoman Debra Stark
District 3
Adam.grant@phoenix.gov




From: Leslie Lewis
Sent: Saturday, December 5, 2020 3:22 PM
To: Council District 3 PCC
Subject: Phoenix Rezoning Case Z-41-20

Hi - I am writing regarding the proposed HonorHealth Medical Center rezoning request near Shea and 54th Street. I
live in the Promontory neighborhood, across from the relevant site, along with my husband and children. We have
raised four children in this neighborhood, and there are some details about this area that must be considered in regards
to this rezoning case (Z-41-20).

We moved into the Promontory neighborhood when my children were very young (age 5 months to 9). I wanted to be in
a good school district for the children, and after significant research, decided that the Scottsdale district would be a
good fit. I graduated from Chaparral myself, and loved the idea of being in the same district while raising my children.
We really loved Cherokee Elementary and Sequoia Elementary, but the houses in the 85253/85254 area codes are not
cheap. However, the Promontory area and the area just north of Shea and 56th Street are more affordable than the
PV/Scottsdale proper addresses, and so we bought in this neighborhood and sent our kids to Cherokee.

We are not the only ones who have had this idea. These neighborhoods are FILLED with children, teenagers, pets, and
parents walking babies. They are wonderful neighborhoods. The only real issue with them is that Shea Blvd, in this
area, is a nightmare. Cars drive by this stretch at 60-70 mph on a regular basis. I have never seen a police officer police
this area in the 15 years I have lived here. It is extremely difficult to make a left onto Shea from these areas (the ongoing
jokes about suicide turns are alarming). And there are SO many teenage drivers navigating this area.

Adding a Medical Center to an already dangerous area of Shea, in an area where young families are raising children, is
not only irresponsible. It is going to significantly increase the chance that children or young adults will die. This is not an
appropriate area for this Center. It is not fair to the families that live here. And it is not fair to the children.

If this rezoning does happen, please please please require a traffic light or two in this area. A light at 54th Street would
greatly help with the turns onto Shea from these family neighborhoods, and would also slow traffic.


Page 284
Thank you for reading this. This rezoning would change the character of the neighborhood, and that would be a shame.
But the real reason that this rezoning is a problem is that it could lead to fatalities. Please don't allow this.

Leslie Lewis
10214 N. 55th St.
Paradise Valley, AZ. 85253
480-773-4193
*******





Page 285
David O Simmons

From: Lisa Miller
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2021 2:10 PM
To: Debra W Stark
Cc: David O Simmons; Alan Stephenson; 'Randy Miller'
Subject: Concerned for proposed Honor Health Med Center


Hello Ms. Stark,

My husband and I live in the Promontory community off of Shea and we are very concerned about
the Proposed Honor Health Med Center that might go up right across the street from us.

Here are our concerns:
1) The amount of traffic that it will bring to the area (as you know it is already getting bad with
Mountainside Fitness and there are no lights nearby to regulate it).
2) The fact that the Honor Health will have an ER attached to it is concerning due to the noise it
will bring (ambulances, etc..)
3) We are beginning to lose the appeal of this ‘community neighborhood/area’ with the
Mountainside now up and then possibly this Honor Health facility - it just doesn’t seem right.
4) We are concerned with the violations that took place with Mountainside that the City messed
up on – we are not feeling comfortable with the City applying the appropriate restrictions
with Honor Health or any other facility that may open in that area.
5) We are in favor of having a closer ER to us, however we believe there are many other places
they could be looking in this area to put this facility.

Thank you for your consideration.

Lisa and Randy Miller
10232 N. 54th PL, Paradise Valley, AZ 85253





Page 286
David O Simmons

From: mshano@ascosigns.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 1:27 PM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Geno Koman
Subject: RE: Paradise valley village nov 2


Hi David,
My name is Mike Shano and I live nearby the proposed Honor Health ER. I would like to voice my opposition to the
project and rezoning of the parcel. I will try being on the virtual meeting
If my schedule permits.
Respectfully,
Mike Shano


To To To
help help help




[search.google.com] [facebook.com] [yelp.com]
prot prot prot
ect ect ect
y ou y ou y ou
r r r
priv priv priv
acy , acy , acy ,
Micr Micr Micr
osof osof osof
t t t
Of… Of… Of…




From: David O Simmons
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 1:04 PM
To: neal rockowitz, md
Cc: Geno Koman
Subject: RE: Paradise valley village nov 2

Good afternoon, Neal,

The case is going to Village for Information Only. This is an opportunity for surrounding stakeholders to express their
support or concerns for the case. If you would like to speak please reply to this email as this will serve as a formal
request to speak to agenda item no. 3. Geno Koman will then send you a link to access the meeting as a
participant. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Email is the best point of contact for me as I am
teleworking and don’t check voicemail messages as often as email.

Respectfully,

Page 287
David Simmons, MA
Planner II* Village Planner
200 West Washington Street
3rd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
602-262-4072
david.simmons@phoenix.gov




From: neal rockowitz, md
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 10:56 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Paradise valley village nov 2

Hi david
I am a concerned citizen regarding the Honorhealth proposed project at 54 th st/Shea. Is
the Nov 2 meeting informational only? Is it designed to hear input from neighboring
residences? I left a voicemail without return call.
Thx
nr




From the desk of
Neal L. Rockowitz, MD





Page 288
David O Simmons

From: Council District 3 PCC
Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 3:30 PM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Adam Grant; Rose Ferguson
Subject: FW: Rezoning of property at 52nd St and Shea Blvd for Honor Health Emergency
Room/Urgent Care


Hi David,

Forwarding the email below as an FYI. If we receive additional emails like this, should we send them to you?

Thank you,

Raquel Estupinan
Chief of Staff
Councilwoman Debra Stark’s Office
Main: 602-262-7441

From: Robert George <314ravs1@cox.net>
Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 3:24 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC ; Council District 3 PCC
Subject: FW: Rezoning of property at 52nd St and Shea Blvd for Honor Health Emergency Room/Urgent Care



Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows 10

From:
Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 3:20 PM
To: debra.stark@phoeinix.gov; jim.waring@phoenix.gov
Subject: Rezoning of property at 52nd St and Shea Blvd for Honor Health Emergency Room/Urgent Care

Dear Ms. Stark and Mr. Waring
It is my understanding that Honor Health is requesting the reference property above to be rezoned from residential
zoning to a zone category that would allow them to build a 24/7 Emergency Room and Urgent Care. My home is located
at Shea Blvd and 56th St. Mr. Waring is my City Council representative and Ms. Stark is the City Council representative for
the area the property for the ER is located. This property was a classic tennis club until just a couple of years ago when
the tennis club closed and the property was used to build a fitness facility building (Mountainside Fitness) and Honor
Health wants to use the adjacent property for their ER/Urgent Care. My wife and I are opposed to this rezoning and
want it to stay residential. There are already 5 Urgent Care facilities within 2.5 miles of 56 th ST and Shea Blvd and the
closest one is a Honor Health facility. Honor Health Shea Medical Center is less than 5 miles away. Adding an 24/7 ER
next to residential property will be very disturbing with sirens all night long and increase in traffic. There are frequent
accidents at the intersection of 56 th St and Shea Blvd and although I couldn’t find recent data on the number of reported
accidents, I imagine you would access to this data. In my opinion it would be best for the local residents of this area and
Honor Health for that matter, if they want to have a 24/7 facility in the area, is to expand their current facility location at
4902 Shea Blvd, just 3 blocks away. Their current facility is located in a business strip mall and zoning would not be a
problem, I assume.
Sincerely,

Page 289
Robert George
10227 N 56th St
Paradise Valley

Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows 10


*******





Page 290
David O Simmons

From: Nancy Ribble
Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 3:20 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Fwd: HonorHealth rezoning case: HonorHealth Shea PUD Z-41-20-3



David,
Forwarding you the email I sent to Debra Stark regarding the rezoning case #Z-41-20-3 to be
included in the Public Record and forwarded to each member of the Village Planning Committee.

Thank you,
Nancy Ribble


From: "nribble"
To: "debra stark"
Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 10:53:00 AM
Subject: HonorHealth rezoning case # Z-41-20 - please reject

Dear Debra Stark,

I live in the LaCamarilla Estates near 54th Street and Shea (behind MountainSide Fitness and the
proposed HonorHealth 24/7 urgent/emergent care facility).

I am very concerned about rezoning case #E-41-20 for this new HonorHealth facility for the following
reasons:

Reason/Description Questions to ask yourself if you lived in our community
24/7 business Would you want a 24/7 business behind your house? This is a business
going into a Residential neighborhood. We bought our homes and
have an expectation of quiet when it gets dark.
Property values Who wants to live near a 24/7 business with threat of sirens/traffic,
etc. Damage our quality of life….24/7 urgent care vs. tennis courts.
Increase in traffic 85 patients per day? How will they exit if they want to go east on Shea-
-cross over MountainSide Fitness? Very difficult to go east on Shea
from this location. If they can't go left, they will feed into the
neighborhood on 54th street. Traffic lights would cause further
congestion on Shea. Already increased number of accidents on 54th
and Shea due to MountainSide Fitness.
Increase in noise/noise pollution Cannot guarantee no sirens anytime during the day or night for those
being transported to the hospital. This noise level comes from the
patients and traffic. Regarding the building, would you want to listen
to a blender all day and night? HonorHealth had a noise study done
and the increase in noise level would be equivalent to a blender.
Increased crime Looking for drugs. HonorHealth can have security, but the point is that
more individuals will come thinking there are drugs to be had bringing



Page 291
them closer to our neighborhood. They can jump the walls and head to
our community.

Increased lights 24/7 Light is already a nuisance coming from the MountainSide Fitness sign
and this issue has yet to be resolved. How much more light is going to
bleed into our homes and bedrooms at night due to HonorHealth?
Height of Building The proposed height has not substantially changed. The height of most
of the building (not the tallest point) is only a few feet different. The
ground has already been raised from the previous
development. Instead of having a view of the mountains, we will have
yet another huge building behind our homes.
Location Why does it need to be located here in a residential neighborhood?
There are so many locations already zoned for commercial that are
available with ample lighting, parking, existing lights, proper traffic
controls, etc.
Change We are already going through so much change, how much more
change do we need to endure? It is not like we are going to a similar
business.



I implore you to consider all these items as though you lived in our same community and not what is
going to bring $$$ to the City because it still can -- just from an alternate location.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Nancy Ribble
602-300-3655





Page 292
David O Simmons

From: David Urbinato
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 9:48 AM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Samantha Keating
Subject: FW: emdist3 - Form Submission


David, this one is yours, correct? I told D3 staff I’d share the comment. No follow up necessary, unless you see the need.

David Urbinato
Management Assistant II
Phoenix Planning and Development Department
602-534-3630

From: Council District 3 PCC
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 6:23 AM
To: Debra W Stark ; David Urbinato ; Raquel Estupinan

Cc: Rose Ferguson
Subject: FW: emdist3 - Form Submission

Good morning,

Please see Ms. Ribble’s concerns regarding HonorHealth rezoning near 54th St. and Shea Blvd below.

Adam Grant
Council Aide to Councilwoman Debra Stark
District 3
Adam.grant@phoenix.gov




From: no-reply@phoenix.gov
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 5:31 PM
To: Council District 3 PCC
Subject: emdist3 - Form Submission


FROM : Nancy Ribble

SUBJECT : HonorHealth rezoning near 54th St. and Shea Blvd.

MESSAGE : I appreciate your assistance in asking Honor Health to work with the neighbors at La Camarilla estates so we
don't have another episode of what happened with Mountainside Fitness. I just wanted to let you know that Honor
Health is not answering our questions and continues to give us a sales pitch about how great they are to the community.
They are giving the appearance that they are working with us when in fact they are not and I am very concerned about
them moving into the neighborhood and what it means for our immediate residential community. For example, the
height of the proposed Honor Health building is only one foot below the Mountainside Fitness building. The picture they
provided makes it look like it is less; however, I can do the math plus the building will be starting at a much higher

Page 293
elevation than the prior building which also makes a huge difference. I have other concerns as well. Your continued
support in this matter would be greatly appreciated.

Email : nribble@q.com

AREA : 602

PHONE : 300-3655

ADDRESS : 5227 E Sahuaro Dr

CITY : Scottsdale

STATE : AZ

ZIP : 85254

Submission ID: 114f69b7bcd443ccbb66042f36884495

Form Submission On : 9/15/2020 5:30:53 PM

Referer: https://phoenix.gov/district3/contact-district-3

This is Not Spam - This message is sent on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
Please handle appropriately.





Page 294
David O Simmons

From: neal rockowitz, md
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 10:56 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Paradise valley village nov 2



Hi david
I am a concerned citizen regarding the Honorhealth proposed project at 54 th st/Shea. Is
the Nov 2 meeting informational only? Is it designed to hear input from neighboring
residences? I left a voicemail without return call.
Thx
nr




From the desk of
Neal L. Rockowitz, MD





Page 295
David O Simmons

From: Nelda
Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 8:46 PM
To: Debra W Stark
Cc: David O Simmons; lan.stephenson@phoenix.gov
Subject: SHEA REZONING OBJECTION !!


It's simple. This is a residential area and should remain as such. There are existing structures that are better
geographically suited for this type of business.

Do not destroy the Shea corridor with another massive structure which will bring too much traffic and noise to the area.

There will be too many cars in and out of Bella Terra, Mountainside and La Camarilla villas, possibly at the same time, all
added to the commuter traffic which will cause accidents.

Anyone that thinks this is a good idea - to destroy a residential area which includes million dollar homes and beautiful
properties, is slightly crazy. No one that I've spoken with disagrees that another medical establishment is not a bad
thing. BUT NOT HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Find another place.





Page 296
David O Simmons

From: Gary David
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 1:58 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Honor Health zoning change


We just received notice of the proposed zoning change. My wife and I are owners at Bella Terra and we would like to
know how the increased traffic is going to be handled. Our driveway is already a nightmare with the normal Shea traffic
flow. The addition of the fitness center across the street has made the access even more treacherous. With the hospital
and ambulance service addition is there going to be a stoplight added to the street at this location? Or just a wrecker on
standby? Gary and Joan David

Sent from my iPad





Page 297
Page 298
David O Simmons

From: Peggy Jackson
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 5:04 PM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: neal rockowitz, md; Geno Koman
Subject: Re: Paradise valley village nov 2


Hello David,

This is a request to speak at the upcoming Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee agenda item 3.

As a concerned neighbor it’s extremely unfortunate that Honor Health has chosen a plan to rezone the lot directly
attached to our La Camarilla development. My late husband and I moved here 25 years ago hoping for a nice quiet
neighborhood. La Camarilla Racquet Club was a great neighbor for many, many years. The plan to rezone for a medical
emergency rooms seem unnecessary as there are so many options for medical offices within one mile of here.

1. Honor Health Primary Care Physicians have offices at 5010 East Shea. That Complex is very large and I’m sure there’s
availability.

2. The center at the NorthEast Corner of Tatum and Shea. Albertson’s went out of business years ago and nothing has
filled that space. It would be great for the community if something filled that space.

3. In that same complex, Bed Bath and Beyond is going out of business leaving another huge empty space.

4. Fast Med is also within that complex. I understand that Honor Health recently completed a joint venture with Fast
Med, perhaps there is a way to work within their existing building at 4902 East Shea.


I’m a big fan of Honor Health. I’m currently in treatment for lung cancer and due to complications have been
hospitalized twice at Honor Health Thompson Peak. Which, is the emergency room I go to or Honor Health Shea which
are both close enough, fully equipped and staffed with outstanding medical teams.

Again, its unfortunate that we all have to dedicate so much time and energy to rezoning something that is so
unnecessary and extremely intrusive on our neighborhood.

Thank you,
Peggy Jackson
480-710-8278



On Oct 22, 2020, at 1:03 PM, David O Simmons wrote:


Good afternoon, Neal,

The case is going to Village for Information Only. This is an opportunity for surrounding stakeholders to
express their support or concerns for the case. If you would like to speak please reply to this email as
this will serve as a formal request to speak to agenda item no. 3. Geno Koman will then send you a link
to access the meeting as a participant. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Email is

Page 299
the best point of contact for me as I am teleworking and don’t check voicemail messages as often as
email.

Respectfully,

David Simmons, MA
Planner II* Village Planner
200 West Washington Street
3rd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
602-262-4072
david.simmons@phoenix.gov


From: neal rockowitz, md
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 10:56 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Paradise valley village nov 2

Hi david
I am a concerned citizen regarding the Honorhealth proposed project at
54th st/Shea. Is the Nov 2 meeting informational only? Is it designed to
hear input from neighboring residences? I left a voicemail without return
call.
Thx
nr




From the desk of
Neal L. Rockowitz, MD





Page 300
David O Simmons

From: Peter Reaven
Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 2:10 PM
To: Debra W Stark
Cc: David O Simmons; Alan Stephenson
Subject: HonorHealth and related projects on Shea and 54th st



Dear Councilwoman Stark,

I wanted to add my voice to the concern over the development of the HonorHealth ER
project. As a physician I have great respect and interest in seeing the community
receive access and availability to health care services. However, this seems an
inappropriate location for a project such as this, and seems a marked deviation
from the type of zoning that was intended for this residential neighborhood. In
addition to the inappropriateness of the large project in this area- both
esthetically and in terms of the effect on those that live nearby, this is likely to
add greatly to the congestion and traffic in the area. It is already nearly
impossible to turn off Shea into many of these residential streets, and this has
grown worse with the traffic related to Mountain Fitness. The number of
accidents or near accidents continues to increase and will only get worse with
added business activity thrust into this small area. I personally have barely
avoided collisions with last second maneuvers as cars failed to see me as they
raced to enter or leave the property area. I really encourage you all to strongly
discourage this development.


I would also request you seriously examine the zoning and signage issues
related to Mountain Fitness- they have certainly misled the neighborhoods and
likely the City- and their failure to even make any effort to reduce the unneeded
all night signage lighting on the building shows how little regard they have for the
local residents.


Sincerely,


Peter Reaven, MD
10852 N. 53rd St




Page 301
David O Simmons

From: Council District 3 PCC
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 10:37 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: FW: Opposition to Phoenix Rezoning Case Z-41-20


Forwarding…

Raquel Estupinan
Chief of Staff
Councilwoman Debra Stark’s Office
Main: 602-262-7441

From: Bob King
Sent: Saturday, December 5, 2020 12:47 PM
To: Council District 3 PCC
Subject: Opposition to Phoenix Rezoning Case Z-41-20

Dear Councilwoman Stark -

I am writing to express my opposition to Phoenix Rezoning Case Z-41-20, and respectfully request that you join in this
opposition. This request pertains to the proposed Honor Health Medical Center on Shea, east of 56th Street, requiring a
rezoning from residential to commercial. My wife and I feel strongly that this rezoning for a 24/7 Urgent Care and
Emergency Room operation is not compatible with our neighborhood. This neighborhood was severely impacted by the
construction of the huge Mountainside Fitness facility which replaced La Camarilla; the construction of this Medical Center
will cause even greater permanent irreparable harm.

Thank you in advance for your support.

Robert and Patricia King
10213 N. 55th Street
cell: 480-241-7521
*******





Page 302
David O Simmons

From: TIM FROHOCK
Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 11:46 AM
To: David O Simmons; Debra W Stark; Alan Stephenson
Cc: tim timlasota.com
Subject: Rezoning Case: HonorHealth Shea PUD is Z-41-20-3


Good afternoon

My wife, young son and I are residents in La Camarilla subdivision. I’ve been a phoenix metro resident for 30 years. We moved to La
Camarilla from mid-town Phoenix a bit more than four years ago for the schools for our son, as well as seeking more of a suburban, quieter
pace of life further away from the typical noise experienced in midtown or downtown. We’ve been extremely happy with the subdivision as well
as the neighborhood at large.

We are troubled by the proposed plans to build a 24/7 clinic with emergency room facility adjacent to our nice quiet neighborhood. We can not
see the rationale for changing the complexion of the light commercial plot that abuts our neighborhood in this manner. For years, that plot of
land has housed a fitness center with tennis courts that caused no late night noise or excessive lighting issues. Stated differently, the facility
was a good neighbor to the homeowners. The oversized new fitness center has changed part of that already with the nearly obscene late night
lighting, but adding an emergency room clinic on the adjacent land would forever alter much of the allure that La Camarilla attracted us to from
the start.

The current quietness of the area lends itself well to taking advantage of the cool spring and fall nights with the windows open. It would only
take a few nights of being woken up to blaring sirens before that luxury would be lost forever. Maybe that seems like a minor issue to some but
it’s not to our family nor our neighbors. It’s a quality of life issue.

There are four corners of properly zoned commercial real estate less than 1/2 mile to the west from our neighborhood at Tatum and Shea. I
wouldn’t pretend to know the benefit to Honor Health by pursuing our specific neighboring plot of land versus the large quantity of possibilities
at Tatum and Shea , or other similar areas, but it baffles me to think a fair minded business like Honor Health would think this location adjacent
to La Camarilla would produce a positive relationship between our neighbors and the business. It also troubles me that long-term zoned
adjacent real estate could so easily be rezoned and changed forever. If successful, what should we brace ourselves for, for a subsequent
change in the near future?

Please do not allow this 24/7 emergency room project to proceed.

Thank you.

Respectfully,

Tim Frohock
5344 e. Mercer Lane
Scottsdale AZ, 85254
602-568-5200





Page 303
Page 304
David O Simmons

From: Randy Oppenheimer
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 10:52 AM
To: David O Simmons; Debra W Stark
Subject: Rezoning Case


As a physician I think its great to have more facilities accessible to the community. However, having a 24/7 facility with
an ER and ambulances in a residential neighborhood is not a good idea.Especially when there are plenty of empty
commercial buildings available less than a mile away.


Randy Oppenheimer MD





Page 305
David O Simmons

From: Eileen Shorr
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 1:19 PM
To: Debra W Stark
Cc: David O Simmons; Alan Stephenson
Subject: Honor Health current emergency proposal




>
> Please vote no to the HonorHealth emergency facility near 52nd and Shea in Scottsdale. I live in the condo at this
corner on Shea. The traffic noise is awful now, please do not allow ambulances 24/7 to this location. It is difficult for a
75 year old to sleep now, this proposal will make sleep impossible. Traffic is also a nightmare. Even though I do all my
healthcare with HonorHealth, I still request that you please vote against this proposal at this location. Please have them
consider the Sears or Dillard’s locations or any spot at the Paradise Valley Mall. Thanks for your time and consideration
of this important matter for many residents near by the proposed location.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Eileen Shorr
eileenshorr@gmail.com
> 856-275-4796
> Sent from my iPhone





Page 306
David O Simmons

From: Clark Westburn
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 2:17 PM
To: Debra W Stark
Cc: David O Simmons; Alan Stephenson
Subject: Rezoning Case: HonorHealth Shea PUD is Z-41-20-3


Dear Ms. Stark,

The purpose of this email is not to convince you of the evils of the planned HonorHealth "Outpatient" Medical Center -
Shea, but to ask you to help convince HonorHealth to collaborate with neighborhood residents to relocate it to a more
appropriate place in the neighborhood.

The label of "Outpatient" is misleading, as HonorHealth plans to operate a 24-hour Emergency Room there, transporting
patients by ambulance to HonorHealth Shea down the road as needed.

And yet, knowing the above, we with think this facility is fantastic to have in our neighborhood. The problem is that
HonorHealth could not have done a worse job of picking the lot in our neighborhood to build it.

Our reasons consist of the following:

1. Unusually Dangerous Traffic - We highly urge you to drive by the proposed location. Phoenix traffic is bad, but this
particular spot is unusually dangerous. Here, Shea Blvd. Eastbound backs up all the way from 56th Street, and Shea
Blvd Westbound backs up all the way from Tatum Blvd. In front of the proposed HonorHealth site, it is not unusual for
traffic to be at a slow stop-and-go throughout the day. HonorHealth's own plans require ambulances to make a left turn
out of their facility onto Shea. Anyone living here, and folks at Mountainside Fitness next door, can attest that left turns
onto Shea are nearly impossible because of the traffic, and we residents all have our own workarounds through the
neighborhood to circumvent it. In fact, the City of Phoenix just finished installing a new traffic light at the commercial
center of 4700 block of E. Shea because of this same problem. There is no traffic light at the proposed HonorHealth site.
Following HonorHealth's ambulance plan, ambulances will have to make risky left turns through traffic, or use a
workaround like a u-turn on Shea or an alternate path through residential streets - with disruptive sir ens and lights running
the whole time. The many non-emergency vehicles will also be faced with risky turns out of the parking lot. We drive this
stretch of Shea often, and we are very concerned about our safety with all the new traffic trying to enter Shea there.

2. Missed Opportunity for Adaptive Re-Use - Within a just a few blocks of the proposed site, there are literally acres of
empty commercial real estate space. We are 2nd and 3rd generation Phoenicians, and the pain we feel every time we
see our buildings thrown away never lessens. Paradise Valley Mall and the other retail malls around Tatum & Cactus,
and Tatum & Shea all have occupancy issues and are at risk. There is good news - this poses a terrific opportunity for
anyone wanting to locate their business here, including HonorHealth. We residents would welcome with open arms the
planned HonorHealth facility in one of our unoccupied storefronts. However, instead of working with us and being part of
our community, HonorHealth decided to leave us out of the planning and leave our empty business space to a dismal fate.

3. Directly Disrupts Too Many Residences - The proposed site might be on Shea Blvd, but in truth it is a wholly
residential area merely divided by Shea Blvd. There are many residences on both sides of Shea here. The facility will
also directly border single family homes that never had to deal with frequent ambulance sirens and lights, and is across
the street from residential condominiums with hundreds of residents that never had to deal with problems from lighted
signs, headlights shining directly into their windows from across the street and frequent ambulance noise. The average
ambulance siren is 130 decibels - a tremendous increase over the 38.4-79.9 decibels that HonorHealth says is the current
ambient noise level in the area.

4. Wildly Inappropriate Zoning - Our understanding is that this site was zoned PAD-2 so it could act as a buffer between
the La Camarilla homes and Shea Blvd. A highly active 24x7 Emergency Room is a wild departure from the spirit of the
lot's original zoning, and we oppose that departure and HonorHealth's request to change the lot's zoning.





Page 307
Let us be clear - We do want this new HonorHealth facility to be built in our neighborhood. We also want people to be able
to exit the facility safely, and want it to not negatively impact our quality of life and that of our neighbors. With all the
available commercial real estate close by, we strongly believe it is possible to have all those things.

We hope the residents here can count on your leadership to help us reach a solution that works for everyone.

Full disclosure, by a technicality of a few hundred feet we currently live in Paradise Valley. Regardless of our current
official citizenship, we are proud Phoenicians through and through, and would love to discuss this issue further if you
would like.

Best,

The adult residents of 10450 N. 52nd St., Paradise Valley, AZ 85253

Bob Erdman

Tammi Erdman

Robert Erdman III

480.443.4755





Page 308
David O Simmons

From: VICKI ROSS
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 11:22 AM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: debra.stark@phx.gov; neal rockowitz, md
Subject: Propsed honor health 54th st and Shea


I am writing on behalf of my husband, Dr Burr Ross, and myself to express our strong disapproval for the proposed
emergency center on Shea. My husband and I have lived in this neighborhood for 35 years. We bought one of the first
lots available, because of the family friendly tennis club in front of us on Shea and the intimate neighborhood setting.
We are terribly disappointed with Mountainside going in and the accompanying traffic and signage. But we are even
more unhappy with the proposed health/emergency center with all the potential noise, ambulances, etc. associated.
There are multiple medical centers within walking distance of our homes. I cannot imagine how there could be a need,
in the first place.
But more importantly, we were assured as original owners that property was could only be used for recreation!

The traffic at 54th street and Shea is already at excessive. The lights from Mountainside Fitness already exceed city
regulations. The shopping center at Tatum and Shea has countless buildings empty that could be used for such a health
center. There are so many reasons why this proposal makes no sense and would be damaging to us as homeowners.

Please put yourself, as a homeowner, in our position when you make your recommendations.

Vicki and Burr Ross
5342 E Sahuaro Dr
Scottsdale, Arizona





Page 309
David O Simmons

From: Bieniek
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 1:30 PM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Debra W Stark
Subject: Reasoning Honor Health on Shea


I have lived in La Camarilla for 27 years and in the past have been a member of the tennis and health clubs. I am sad
that the new owner Mountainside as built a monster building in place of a pleasing design of the previous building. Now
Honor Health is proposing a 24 hour facility. Has anyone studied the traffic on Shea? In afternoon, the West bound
traffic is backed up past 56 th street. So are ambulances and patients Going to divert through the neighborhoods? I
don’t get it. There is an empty lot west of Trader Joe’s and an empty center where Albertsons was. What’s the problem
with either of these areas? Al Bieniek


Sent from my iPad





Page 310
David O Simmons

From: Bob Wiesenberger
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 11:55 AM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Debra W Stark
Subject: Rezoning Case: Honor Health Shea PUD is Z-41-20-3


As a long time resident,23 years, of the North Promontory development, which is across the street from the proposed
24/7 Honor Health Emergency facility, I oppose its constriction.
My reason for this that the area is currently zoned for residential usage and there is no community need for such a facility
the area. There already exists an Honor Health Urgent Care facility
three blocks West on Shea Blvd. A 24/7 facility will be disruptive and disturb the tranquil residential nature that presently
exists.
Shea Blvd. east of 56th street is a six lane road that narrows to four lanes in the area of the proposed site. Construction
will only lead to further road congestion, traffic delays, and possible accidents. Also resulting
in problems entering and leaving the communities on the South side of Shea Blvd. The emergency vehicles that will be
arriving, once construction is completed will cause further traffic problems in both directions. The noise
from the sirens will be disturbing to the local residents.
The planning committee should be aware that there exists ample commercial sites West of the proposed site at Tatum
and Shea Blvd's. There are vacant lots as well as vacant stores that could be converted to medical space.
I believe that it is the obligation, duty, and responsibility of the committee to have the best interest of the local community
in mind when deciding these matters.
Therefore, I am requesting that the planning committee deny the request for a change in zoning.
Thank you for your consideration.

Robert Wiesenberger
10211 N 55th Pl.
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253





Page 311
David O Simmons

From: Bruce E. Beverly
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 11:17 AM
To: David O Simmons; geno.koman@phoneix.gov; Debra W Stark
Subject: Honor Heath Facility at 54th and Shea Blvd. (Case Number Z-41-20)

Importance: High


Mr. Simmons, Mr. Koman, Ms. Stark,


My wife and I live in the Promontory subdivision which is just South of the proposed Honor Health facility. We don’t
have any objection to the development of a health care facility in the general area but we strongly object to its proposed
placement at 54th Street and Shea and we will explain why.

Most would agree that having a medical facility similar to what Honor Health proposes is a positive for nearby residents
but placing such a facility in a residential setting when the commercial market is shifting almost daily from large box
stores and commercial centers is, at best, premature.

Easy access to such a facility benefits a broader segment of the population so why shouldn’t the facility be placed closer
to freeways like state route 51 or the 101 to make it easier for patients from a larger geographic area to access it. To
access the proposed site on Shea and 54 th Street would require an individual to navigate 4 or 5 traffic lights if they are
driving East on Shea and a similar number if driving West. Placing the facility in a commercially zoned location near one
of the larger freeways would facilitate access for the consumer and reduce traffic at traffic lights on Shea and would be
in compliance with commercial zoning guidelines and restrictions.

Currently there are more than half a dozen urgent or medical care facilities in commercially zoned locations off of Shea
Blvd (Honor Health Fast Med, Honor Health Medical Group, Phoenix Children’s Scottsdale Urgent Care, Banner Urgent
Care, Minute Clinic and Banner Health Center on East Greenway Road to name just a few). All of those facilities are
located in commercially zoned locations and are not zoned for PAD-2.

The neighboring residents don’t object to having medical facilities nearby as noted above. The residents object to
placing it literally in their back yard when so many commercial facilities are undergoing dynamic changes. The residents
are looking to the City to comply with their own zoning policies and to protect the interests of the resident who made
decisions to acquire property in the area because they were assured that zoning requirements would be adhered to by
the City. If the City is not going to adhere to these zoning restrictions then we believe the City should explore how best
to compensate residents for their diminished property values.

Honor Health itself has stated that placing such facilities in residential locations is the wave of the future. Based on
Honor Health’s own forecasts this residential strategy will be successful and with its great use comes additional traffic –
not just East and West traffic but North and South traffic as well. If Honor Health’s forecasts are correct, then it is
reasonable to expect Honor Health to return with future proposals for expansion. Once the zoning of this Honor Health
facility is approved what keeps the City from approving future proposals especially since the facility is already in place

Another concern is compliance with PAD-2 zoning restrictions. Honor Health has outlined what restrictions would be in
place should their proposal be approved by the City but what assurances residents have that the City of Phoenix will
enforce those zoning restrictions when they clearly have not done so with the adjoining Mountainside facility.




Page 312
PAD-2 zoning restrictions for the area prohibited Mountainside from having a structure as high or building signage as
bright as it is at night (PAD-2 only permits a business that coexists on residential zoned land). Signage for the area
should be much more subtle, in a halo format, to fit into the neighborhood but that clearly didn’t happen nor has the
City taken any action to correct it. Presumably the City’s response is – Oh well, it’s too late now. Such a response is
unacceptable and corrective action is needed now. Drive down Shea Blvd. from State Route 51 to the 101 and the only
signs similar to Mountainside’s will be found in commercially zoned space – not property that is zoned PAD-2. With that
said, why should the residents affected believe the City is sincere in complying with legally approved zoning guidelines
and restrictions?

The former occupant of the space (La Camarilla) complied with the existing PAD - 2 zoning (Residential Zoning) guidelines
and restrictions and coexisted well with its neighbors but the City clearly allowed Mountainside to depart from the
legally required restrictions so again, if the City is not going to comply or actively regulate then why should residents
believe this process is not simply a “form over substance” process. Once the City approves Honor Health’s PUD zoning
proposal what keeps Honor Health or the City from deviating from their proposal or the City from acquiescing to any
proposed change. Who pays the price for this lack of compliance, not the businesses nor the city administrators or
elected officials who permitted it to happen. The residents pay the price and it is a price that will continue to be paid so
long as these facilities are permitted to stray from the legal restrictions and PUD zoning plan.

In light of the above, can one reasonably believe that the City, its administrators and our elected officials, will look out
for the best interests of the area residents and comply with the PUD restrictions when they didn’t do so with respect to
Mountainside? Under the circumstances we believe most would agree that the City has failed to adhere to its own
zoning policies so we believe that residents have a legitimate reason to be concerned and to object.

In summary, neighbors don’t have any objection to Honor Health developing a facility in the area but residents and
neighbors object to its placement at 54th Street and Shea. With the rapidly changing commercial market we believe it
would be best to place the facility in a commercially zoned area away from residential homes. Honor Health obviously
believes that their health care model will be successful and will grow so Honor Health should identify a location that will
allow for future growth. If Honor Health does so then I am confident that residents and neighbors in the geographic
area of 54th Street and Shea will benefit and potentially use it.

Respectfully,


Bruce and Toni Beverly
10202 North 54th Place
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253
602-327-8425
bbeverly@azgat.com
602-828-9531
ttbeverly@aol.com

This electronic mail transmission contains information that may be confidential or privileged. Such information is solely for the intended
recipient, and use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of this message, its contents or any attachments is prohibited. Any wrongful interception of this message is
punishable as a Federal Crime. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (602-
445-5529) or by electronic mail at bbeverly@azgat.com





Page 313
David O Simmons

From: Terry
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 3:04 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Honor Health Rezoning


David-

As residents at the Promontory since its inception. Becky and Terry Hamlin are adamantly opposed to the
current rezoning as proposed. The current location is not suitable for a 24 hour 7 day a week Urgent care
facility.

The air traffic above Paradise Valley and Promontory in an out bound to Scottsdale Airport is loud enough
without adding the sirens proposed at the Honor Health facility.

Pluse, Shea narrows to two lanes and the additional traffic generated from Mountain Side will add to a traffic
problem that the city needs to address before considering rezoning of property in the traditionally residential
area.

Again we are opposed to the rezoning proposed by Honor Health

Terry & Becky Hamlin
5432 E. Alan Lane
Phoenix, AZ 85253
602.625.0054



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone




Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone





Page 314
David O Simmons

From: Helene B.
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 11:57 PM
To: David O Simmons; Debra W Stark; Council District 3 PCC
Cc: neal rockowitz, md; William Christian
Subject: Rezoning Case: HonorHealth Shea PUD is Z-41-20-3. The Village Planning Committee


David,
We have registered to speak on Feb. 1, 2021 dealing with the rezoning case: HonorHealth Shea PU is Z-41-20-3.
We have previously written to you stating our objections to this rezoning. We have also signed the petition from our
neighborhoods. We would like to donate our speaking time to Neal L. Rockowitz, M.D.
We both feel strongly about not rezoning this property. There is a lot of property available that is already zoned
in the area for commercial use. We are so concerned about the added traffic to Shea that this project will bring to our
residential neighborhood. Hopefully, you have driven on Shea any time after three o’clock in the afternoon and been
stuck in that traffic.
It is literally bumper to bumper. I can’t imagine how someone needing emergency assistance would be able to navigate
their way through
that kind of traffic. As the traffic continues to build, they will eventually have to resort to using sirens. As this facility’s
business continues
to grow, so will the traffic and with it open 24/7, it will have a major impact on our environment as well as our
neighborhood.
In addition, the lighting and signage will not be compatible with our homes. We have put in a great deal of money into
our homes.
Therefore, our biggest asset/investment, our homes and our property values will go down.
We have lived in this area for a long time. When Scottsdale Airport wanted zoning for a small airport with hardly
any traffic, we supported it.
Now it is a busy airport and our homes are right in the middle of all their flight patterns. Once they had their zoning,
over the years, they forgot about
all the promises they had made to get our support.
While HonorHealth says now that there will be no sirens 24/7 and there are no immediate plans for this building to
become a trauma center,
once they get their zoning, it is my understanding that some years down the line, they can add the sirens. Eventually,
they could add a helicopter pad.
Would you want your home near this type of facility?

There is absolutely no reason to do this to our neighborhood. With businesses closing at Tatum and Shea and on
Cactus, there
is plenty of commercial property for them to choose from. When the La Camarilla developer wanted to build the La
Camarilla Estates
sub-division of homes and a tennis club, we were all excited to have those facilities available to us. He created a tasteful
complex and
actually added to our neighborhood. When he sold his club property, that property already had been rezoned and when
Mountainside
built their building, they needed no approval to build that awful building. Please, please do not rezone this property and
further add
to the devaluation of our homes.
Thank you for giving our speaking time to Dr. Neal Rockowitz and please take my letter to heart and turn this
rezoning down.



Page 315
Sincerely,

Helene and Larry Spero



P.S. I just received a notice that Harvest Health is seeking rezoning on the corner of Tatum and
Shea. https://www.phoenix.gov/pddsite/Documents/PZ/Z-38-20n.pdf
This is to establish a Marijuana Dispensary. That particular shopping center has limited parking. I also would worry
about security and safety.
Just a few doors down is a yogurt store where families can sit outside at tables and enjoy their treat together.
Our neighborhood is a family
area with lots of children. The Marijuana registry where you had an appointment to have your examination & to
qualify for your medical marijuana card was located
on the SE corner of Scottsdale Road and Shea. It was located on the inside of that strip mall. They had plenty of
parking. Because of the set up
of those buildings, it would provide privacy of those seeking to purchase Marijuana. It would be a win/win situation
for everyone. Please protect
our neighborhood.





Page 316
David O Simmons

From: Sherry Brown
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2021 8:45 AM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Rezoning #Z-41-20-3


Dear Mr. Simmons,

I’ve been updated by my neighbors about the potential of an HonorHealth 24-hour emergency facility in our family
neighborhood of, Shea and 52nd Street. I am clearly opposed to this possibility for a variety of reasons. I’ve lived in our
home for 23 years and have invested in our community and home. I’m curious why HonorHealth thinks putting in a 24-
hour facility in a spot with homes surrounding the area and already Shea being a busy street, is a great choice and why
we should allow this.

I understand there’s an upcoming virtual meeting, February 1st? Can you tell me how I can connect with that meeting?

Regards,

Sherry Brown
602.524.3138





Page 317
David O Simmons

From: William Christian
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 10:52 AM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Geno Koman
Subject: Register to Speak- Z-41-20-3, Feb 1st


Mr Simmons,

Please register me to speak on Feb 1st regarding case Z-41-20-, Honor Health.

I am opposed to the rezoning.

Thank you,

William Christian

Sent from my iPhone





Page 318
Attachment C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-41-20-3
INFORMATION ONLY
Date of VPC Meeting November 2, 2020
Request From C-O (Commercial Office) (0.12 acres) and PAD-2
(Planned Area Development 2) (3.07 acres)
Request To PUD (Planned Unit Development) (3.19 acres)
Proposed Use Hospital and other commercial uses
Location Approximately 400 feet west of the northwest corner of
54th Street and Shea Boulevard

VPC DISCUSSION:

24 speaker cards were submitted in opposition, wishing to speak
4 speaker cards were submitted in favor, wishing to speak

Ms. Wendy Riddell, representing the applicant, went over the PUD request in
great detail. She outlined why the PUD designation was being proposed as
opposed to a traditional zoning designation. She highlighted the increased
setbacks, which are more than double that what is required in the underlying
zoning designation. She highlighted that the proposal is dark sky compliant. She
went over the hours of operation and highlighted peak times. She went over
emergency vehicle lights and siren policy on the site and shared that an
acoustical study had been conducted. She went over the traffic study and shared
that there will be a slight increase in traffic. She went over the public outreach
efforts to date.

Mr. Rick Murdock, the applicant representing Honor Health, He went over the
business model for the proposed development and the potential relationships
and benefits the community could take advantage of.

Mr. Joe Lesher thanked Ms. Riddell for addressing the high points of the project.

Mr. Alex Popovic applauded the applicant for providing a website as a
community resource during COVID-19 for the project.

Mr. Robert Goodhue asked staff if the tennis club that was previously located on
this site count as open spare for the PAD-2 zoning designation.

Mr. David Simmons, staff, shared that the tennis club did count as open space
for the PAD-2 designation.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 319
Mr. Eric Cashman asked what the difference between the like facility was
located on Thunderbird and this location.

Ms. Riddell shared that this product type is a first of its find and is not
comparable to the Thunderbird location.

Mr. Murdock stated that the Thunderbird location is a Scottsdale Healthcare
facility, not an Honor Health facility.

Vice Chair Gubser asked what is allowed in the PAD-2 designation.

Ms. Louisa Ward asked if the PAD-2 was an older designation that originally
allowed residential and minor commercial uses found in C-1.

Vice Chair Gubser asked if C-1 would allow this use.

Ms. Riddell shared the C-1 designation would allow this use with a Use Permit.

Ms. Toby Gerst applauded the applicant for proposing double the setback
requirement and asked about toxic waste generated on site. She asked what the
disposal method is for the toxic medical waste and how are the neighbors
protected from such waste.

Ms. Riddell shared that all medical waste is stored internally and disposed of by
a third-party contractor.

Ms. Gerst applauded the signage proposed.

Mr. Popovic asked if ambulances would be dropping people off.

Mr. Murdock explained that this facility will not pull patience from other areas
and will only serve the local community. Therefore, ambulances will not drop
people off too often from outside the area.

Ms. Ward asked if there will be a helicopter pad and service.

Ms. Riddell shared that there will not be helicopter service at this location, and it
is specifically forbidden in the PUD ordinance for this site. Therefore, there will
never be an opportunity to add helicopter service at this location.

Public Comment:

Dr. Neal Rockowitz, speaking for himself and several other neighbors, opened
by sharing when he moved to the area. He lightly touched on the PAD-2 zoning
designation requirements found in the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. He
shared that he and his neighbors have concerns about lighting, blocked view
corridors, signage concerns, emergency vehicle traffic, noise and the specific use
at this location. He also shared concerns with the proximity of this use in relation
to single-family homes, the 24-hour operation of the use, and the massing of the
building.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 320
Mr. Steward Taylor stated that he lives on the south side of Shea Blvd. He has
concerns about the representation from the applicant. He is concerned that
promises made will not be kept over time and they can’t be enforced by the City
of Phoenix. He feels the proposed use is an inappropriate use of the land. Major
concerns with use are sirens, lights, traffic, and the character of the area
changing.

Mr. Terry Hamlin shared that he resides at 5432 E Alan Ln. Shared concerns
about the proposed zoning designation, air traffic, noise resulting from air traffic,
and feels a better use of the land would be a public park.

Ms. Lauren Leonard residing at 5401 E Alan St shared concerns about light
pollution, noise, traffic and the business model of the proposed use. She stated
that this use would not be a benefit to the community, but a burden.

Mr. Luis Lopez residing at 5358 E Mercer Ln shared concerns about the public
neighborhood meeting times. He believes the applicant is lying to the public. He
has traffic and safety concerns as well.

Ms. Nancy Ribble residing at 5227 E Saguaro Dr ditto’ d Neal’s comments. He
also has concerns about the 24-hour business in proximity to residential, property
values, traffic and noise.

Mr. Tim La Sota residing at 2198 E Camelback Rd has concerns with the use
proposed at this location.

Mr. Maulik Parikh resides on the south side of Shea Blvd. He shared concerns
with the character of the area changing, property values decreasing and the long-
range urban vision for the area. He shared that there are many vacant
commercial uses in the area that this applicant could utilize where the use is
more appropriate. He is opposed.

Mr. Rafael Dutoit shared that he is 10 years old. He shared that he was a
member of the tennis club, which was replaced with Mountain Side Fitness. He
would like to see a public park on this site to give local children a place to play.

Ms. Jennifer Wann resides in Paradise Valley North. He is in support of the
proposal. She has a terminal ill child who would benefit from this proposed use.
She shared that this specific use if needed for the area. She asked the
committee to recommend approval.

Mr. Gino Davi residing at 4650 E Alan Ln. shared that he is in favor of the
proposal.

Applicants Response:

Ms. Wendy Riddell iterated that this proposal has nothing to do with the
Mountain Side Fitness site. It is a different developer, owner, and applicant. She
stated that the tennis club is not coming back. She stated that change is hard for
most people in most scenarios. She also stated that this is not prime residential
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 321
real estate as it fronts onto Shea Blvd, which is an extremely busy major arterial.
She also shared that the applicant has shopped other sites and the subject site is
the best choice.

VPC Discussion:

Ms. Toby Gerst asked if the committee has been equitable with time for both the
opponents and proponents of the cases. She stressed that this is of utmost
importance.

Chairwoman Jennifer Hall stated that we try our best to accommodate, but it is
dependent upon many factors including number of registered speakers, length of
presentations as some projects are more complex than others and length of
agenda.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 322
Attachment D




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-41-20-3

Date of VPC Meeting February 1, 2021
Request From C-O (Approved PAD-2 SP) (Commercial Office,
Approved Planned Area Development, Special Permit)
and PAD-2 SP (Approved PAD-2 SP) (Planned Area
Development, Approved Planned Area Development,
Special Permit) (3.19 acres)
Request To PUD (Planned Unit Development) (3.19 acres)
Proposed Use Hospital and other commercial uses
Location Approximately 400 feet west of the northwest corner of
54th Street and Shea Boulevard
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation with two
additional stipulations.
VPC Vote 10-4-2 with committee members Belous, Goodhue,
Hall, Maggiore, Mazza, Popovic, Severs, Sparks, Wise,
and Gubser in favor. Committee members Cantor,
Gerst, Mortensen and Stewart not in favor. Committee
members Balderrama and Lesher abstained.

VPC DISCUSSION:

5 speaker cards were submitted in favor, wishing to speak
16 speaker cards were submitted in opposition, wishing to speak
35 speaker cards were submitted in opposition, donating time to others
Mr. David Simmons, staff, went over the request with the committee. He
covered the existing General Plan Land Use designation on the site and
surrounding area, the uses in the surrounding area, the height limitations
stipulated as well as enhanced buffers abutting existing large lot residential uses
to the north as well as the enhanced streetscape along Shea Boulevard. He also
went over stipulation rationale with the committee.

Mr. Alex Popovic asked about emergency vehicle operations on the site.

Mr. Simmons shared that this is non regulatory from a zoning perspective.
However, he shared that the applicant has written a small section into the
development narrative that addresses this.

Ms. Toby Gerst asked if there were other emergency rooms such as this.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 323
Mr. Simmons shared that this is a fairly new product type.

Ms. Anita Mortensen shared that she has traffic concerns.

Ms. Wendy Riddell, with Berry Riddell, LLC, representing the applicant, gave an
in depth presentation covering what she and the development team have done
since the last public hearing including numerous phone calls to neighbors,
meeting with Dr. Rockowitz on site and took pictures from his yard to determine
best mitigation measures. As a result, they made the following clarifications and
modifications:
• The permitted uses have been modified from C-1 and hospital use to
Commercial Office and hospital use (prohibiting stand-alone retail uses).
• RV parking and a helistop have been added as prohibited uses.
• Lighting standards were clearly defined, to ensure all lighting is shielded
and light poles do not exceed 15 feet in height.
• Added language to ensure that building colors are neutral and non-
reflective.
• Explored additional traffic mitigation with the City of Phoenix and
committed to making improvements required by the City.
Ms. Riddell added that as a result of public outreach, additional landscaping has
been added in the northern parking lot. She highlighted the enhanced building
and landscape setbacks adjacent to residential to the north and highlighted the
building height is well below the development standards for the underlying zoning
designation. She proposed a stipulation that would restrict the HonorHealth
facility from contracting with emergency service agencies, which would cut down
in siren usage. Lighting, signage and hours of operation were also covered.

Ms. Toby Gerst asked the applicant to show the hospital comparison graphic so
she the VPC can see how close those facilities are to residential.

Ms. Riddell stated that the hospital comparison graphic depicts all large hospital
campuses and we do not know exactly how close residential is to these
campuses but can check and get back.

Vicechair Joe Lesher asked why this project couldn’t be located somewhere
else.

Ms. Riddell shared that some commercial use will be going on this site if this
project does not move forward. She went on to say that other commercial lots in
the area that have leases which preclude this use from going on other nearby
sites.

Mr. Alex Popovic stated that he applauds the development teams’ efforts,
particularly in regard to public outreach. He said the efforts are commendable.

Public Comment:

Dr. Neal Rockowitz, residing at 5337 E Sahuaro Drive, abutting the site to the
north, stated that the applicant is very arrogant. He shared that he any 35 of his

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 324
fellow neighbors, whom donated time to him to speak, have concerns about
traffic, land use, livability of area, height, and the appropriateness of the project
next to a residential area. He also stated that this would constitute leap from
zoning as there should be a C-O, R-5, or some lighter zoning designation
between residential and a use such as the one proposed. A 24/7 emergency
center directly adjacent to residential is unacceptable. Dr. Rockowitz went on to
discuss the history of how the area developed. He shared that he and many of
his neighbors have a jaded view of city processes from past experiences,
particularly the neighboring Mountainside Fitness project. He stated that a yes
vote for this project would be misguided and wrong.

Mr. Bill Christian shared that two other neighbors donated time to him. He
shared that this proposal does not fit the character of the area. The noise,
intensity, sirens and increased amount of traffic over time would be a detriment to
the existing residence int eh area. He stated that there has got to be a more
suitable place for this use.

Mr. La Sota, representing 29 homeowners on the south side of Shea, shared
that an emergency room is an emergency room, despite what size the facility is.
This use is going to be loud and does not belong in a residential area.

Mr. Bruce Beverly stated that this is the wrong use in the wrong place at the
wrong time. He shared that commercial facilities are vacating rapidly due to
changing market conditions. Why not move to an exiting commercial site.

Ms. Sherry Brown, residing on 57th Street and Shea, stated that she is shocked
that this is even proposed at this location as there are already several similar
uses in the area.

Ms. Tami Erdman stated that their ha been a lack of communication with the
applicant and the notification area is not large enough. Has concerns about
noise.

Ms. Nancy Ribble shared that she has concerns about noise and increased light
pollution.

Mr. Maulik Parikg has concerns about traffic, proposed use, and character of
area changing.

Mr. Luis Lopez stated that this proposal is unique.

Mr. Geno Davi shared that he is in support of the request.

Mr. Doug Leventhal shared that he is in support of the proposal from two
perspectives. It is a community amenity and the design and use are outstanding.

Mr. Dan Cheyne supports the project as it is a great amenity in the
neighborhood.

Mr. Doug Heltne shared that he is in support of the project.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 325
Ms. Julie Silverthorn has concerns about public safety and traffic.

Mr. Bruce Bethancourt in in support of the proposal.

Mr. Paul Katsenes is in support of the project as this is a 1st class medical
service.

Mr. Bryan Jeffries shared his support for the request.

Ms. Nancy Ganz stated that one’s core beliefs reflect who they are and that is a
good thing. We, the neighbors, have concerns about this project.

Mr. Victor Felicia shared his support for the project.

Applicant Response:

Ms. Riddell asked a rhetorical question, why this location? Because it is needed.
She went overt the meeting minutes from the case history on this site a sited that
this was never intended to be open space, a park or anything other than
commercial. She is proposing an additional stipulation that would restrict he
facility from contracting with private emergency vehicle services, which would
greatly reduce the number of emergency vehicle trips in and out of the site.

VPC Response:

Mr. Alex Popovic asked what community outreach had been conducted? He
shared he is in support of the project.

Ms. Riddell shared that they had done extensive public outreach, created a
website and had numerous Zoom meetings.

Mr. Robert Goodhue asked what could be built by tight without a rezone.

Ms. Riddell shared that government buildings, group homes, churches, schools
and other light commercial uses could be built here by right.

Mr. Alan Sparks shared that the has concerns with the Mountain Side Fitness
violations.

Mr. David Simmons, staff, said that he would reach out to NSD to get a list of
violations on the Mountain Side site.

Ms. Toby Gerst shared that this project should be in a location that gets buy in
from the community. She said the concept is fabulous, but this site is
inappropriate. Therefore, she is not in support.

Ms. Anita Mortensen stated that this site is not a good spot for this use.

Ms. Jennifer Hall stated that she is conflicted with the case. She can see both
sides of the argument. She said that this case has nothing to do with Mountain
side Fitness next door. She shared that all of the public comment is needed and
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 326
appreciated. However, we must look at this from a land use perspective. She is
in support.

Ms. Kathryn Belous shared that this is a viable use for the site and is in support.

Mr. Popovic stated that the lady that was struck by the car on Shea was running
in and out of traffic and was most likely under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

Ms. Mortensen wanted it to be on the record that the lady was not under the
influence but has a disability.
MOTION:
Mr. Alex Popovic made a motion to recommend approval of Rezoning Case No.
Z-41-20-3, per staff’s recommendation and two additional stipulations.
Mr. Alan Sparks seconded the motion.
VOTE:
10-4-2 with committee members Belous, Goodhue, Hall, Maggiore, Mazza,
Popovic, Severs, Sparks, Wise, and Gubser in favor. Committee members
Cantor, Gerst, Mortensen and Stewart not in favor. Committee members
Balderrama and Lesher abstained.

Stipulations:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the HonorHealth Outpatient Medical Center -
Shea PUD reflecting the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to
the Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of
this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the
Development Narrative date stamped January 6, 2021, as modified by the following
stipulations:

a. Front Cover: Remove “HEARING DRAFT” and revise submittal date information
on bottom of the cover page as follows:
1st Submittal: July 29, 2020
2nd Submittal: October 14, 2020
Hearing Draft: January 6, 2021

b. Add parking standards to the comparative development standards table.

c. Add standards for the detached sidewalk in the Development Standards table as
depicted on the landscape plan.

d. Provide a dimensioned landscape plan depicting distance between sidewalk and
back of curb at a 5 foot minimum, sidewalk widths at a minimum of 5 feet wide
and landscape setbacks. Include caliper sizes of trees, number of shrubs under
each tree, groundcover percentages in a table format on the plan.

2. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 327
and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development
Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

3. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study had
been reviewed and approved by the City. Additional off-site improvements and right-
of-way dedications may be required as identified in the approved traffic study.
Development shall be responsible for the cost associated with these improvements
and dedications.

4. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

5. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE
INTERSECTION OF SHEA BOULEVARD AND 54TH STREET, AS APPROVED BY
THE STREETS TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT.

6. THE OPERATOR OF THIS FACILITY SHALL NOT CONTRACT WITH EMERGENCY
MEDICAL SERICVES (“EMS”) TO BRING PATIENTS TO THE FACILITY BY
AMBULANCE WITH LIGHTS AND SIURENS (CODE 3)


Staff Comments:

None




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882
Page 328
Attachment E


REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
March 4, 2021

ITEM NO: 14
DISTRICT NO.: 3
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-41-20-3 (Honor Health Outpatient Medical Center – Shea PUD)
Location: Approximately 400 feet west of the northwest corner of 54th Street
and Shea Boulevard
From: C-O (Approved PAD-2 SP) and PAD-2 (Approved PAD-2 SP)
To: PUD
Acreage: 3.19
Proposal: Planned Unit Development to allow a hospital and other commercial
uses.
Applicant: Wendy Riddell, Berry Riddell, LLC
Owner: 5316 East Shea Boulevard, LLC
Representative: Wendy Riddell, Berry Riddell, LLC

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
Paradise Valley 11/2/2020 Information only.
Paradise Valley 2/1/2021 Approval, per the staff recommendation with additional
stipulations. Vote: 10-4 (2 abstained).

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the Paradise Valley Village
Planning Committee recommendation, with an additional stipulation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Howard made a MOTION to approve Z-41-20-3, per the
Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee recommendation, with the additional
stipulation as read into the record.

Maker: Howard
Second: Johnson
Vote: 6-3 (Gaynor, Montalvo, Shank)
Absent: None
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. The proposed development provides additional protections for nearby
residential uses through site design and enhanced development standards.

2. The proposed development will provide a needed service in the area.




Page 329
3. The proposed development contains enhanced standards that will result is a
more walkable, shaded and pedestrian-friendly environment that will help to
reduce the urban heat island effect.

Stipulations:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the HonorHealth Outpatient Medical
Center - Shea PUD reflecting the changes approved through this request shall
be submitted to the Planning and Development Department within 30 days of
be consistent with the Development Narrative date stamped January 6, 2021,
as modified by the following stipulations:

a. Front Cover: Remove “HEARING DRAFT” and revise submittal date
information on bottom of the cover page as follows:
1st Submittal: July 29, 2020
2nd Submittal: October 14, 2020
Hearing Draft: January 6, 2021

b. Add parking standards to the comparative development standards table.

c. Add standards for the detached sidewalk in the Development Standards
table as depicted on the landscape plan.

d. Provide a dimensioned landscape plan depicting distance between
sidewalk and back of curb at a 5-foot minimum, sidewalk widths at a
minimum of 5 feet wide and landscape setbacks. Include caliper sizes of
trees, number of shrubs under each tree, groundcover percentages in a
table format on the plan.

2. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the development
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

3. The developer shall submit a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to the City for this
development. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted until the study
had been reviewed and approved by the City. Additional off-site improvements
and right-of-way dedications may be required as identified in the approved
traffic study. Development shall be responsible for the cost associated with
these improvements and dedications.

4. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.




Page 330
5. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE
INTERSECTION OF SHEA BOULEVARD AND 54TH STREET, AS
APPROVED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT.

6. THE OPERATOR OF THIS FACILITY SHALL NOT CONTRACT WITH
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (“EMS”) TO BRING PATIENTS TO THE
FACILITY BY AMBULANCE WITH LIGHTS AND SIRENS (CODE 3).

7. PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER
SHALL EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE INCLUDED IN
THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Tamra Ingersoll at (602) 534-6648, TTY use 7-1-1.




Page 331
Attachment F

David O Simmons

From: Wayne Spiekerman
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2021 3:14 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: HonorHealth project




Dear Councilwoman Stark,
My name is Wayne Spiekerman and I am a neighbor in the La Camarilla area. I have heard about
the potential HonorHealth project and I wanted to let you know that I am in full support. I believe
this will provide a much-needed use to the surrounding community. I have heard some of the
people in my community spreading lies about this project trying to scare others into opposition
and I think that is disgraceful. The fact is, this has nothing to do with lights, sirens, or
Mountainside Fitness, they just want to keep it empty land. Unfortunately for them, they don’t
own the land and they don’t get to bully other people away either. I am asking you to continue to
represent us and those in your community who listen to the facts and support this project. Thank
you for all that you do.

Sincerely,
Wayne Spiekerman
5437 E Lupine
Scottsdale, AZ 85254





Page 332
David O Simmons

From: Maria Antonia Ospina
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2021 4:07 PM
To: David O Simmons


I support the Honor Health initiative
Maria Antonia Ospina





Page 333
David O Simmons

From: Doug Leventhal
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2021 4:54 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Z-41-20-3


Hi David,
I am a nearby property owner that would like to speak in support of the above-captioned zoning case (Honor Health) at
Monday night's Village Planning Committee hearing. We support the project and think it is a very good use for the area.
Thank you,
Doug Leventhal
10021 N 55th Place





Page 334
David O Simmons

From: jcaltmann@cox.net
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2021 11:28 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Citizen Comment on Z-41-20-3 before the PV VPC on 01 Feb 2021



Mr. Simmons,

I submit my comments on Case Z-41-20-3, at Shea and 54 th Street, to support a
future Outpatient Medical Center for HonorHealth:

Mr. Chairman, VPC Members,

I am Jon Altmann, A 20-year home owner residing at 5305 E. Sweetwater Av in
the City of Phoenix. I am past VPC member and currently serve as the chairman
of another city commission. To be clear, I am not representing the commission I
chair, but only myself as a homeowner in the area potentially effected by this
zoning case. I am retired from the U.S. Navy and now serve as a public high
school teacher in the Paradise Valley VPC. I also operate a public safety
consulting firm specializing in emergency planning to including emergency
medical services. In the past three years my clients have included three Arizona
cities and one regional airport with regular schedule airline service. I am familiar
with the demands and needs for regional health care services and facilities.

I support the request for change in Case Z-41-20-3. The increasing population
growth in the area and possible additional density growth in the area creates an
additional demand for health care services, and services that are in closer
proximity to where people live. My concern has been the amount of unused or
underused commercial type property in the area over the past several years. The
potential locating of a health care facility that will have an emergency clinic adds
a vital service and allows use of the commercial type space for clean, quiet and
appropriate use.

Your vote in support of this case would be appreciated and is supported by the
this area home owner.

Very respectfully yours,


JON C. ALTMANN, M. Ed. Secondary Ed.
Senior Chief Intelligence Specialist
U.S. Navy (Ret.)


Page 335
February 1, 2021

Re: Z-41-20-3 HonorHealth Outpatient Medical Building

Dear Mr. Simmons & To Whom it May Concern:

We are writing regarding the Honor Health project proposal, the City zoning application of
which we have reviewed in great detail.

My family has lived in the neighborhood that this proposed project serves since May 2000. This
is the neighborhood in which we actually live, work, grocery shop, dine, go to school, walk, bike
and visit with our neighbors every day. Even our primary doctors are just down the street on
Shea (at Honor Health Primary Care). This is truly is our community, and we care about it.

Upon learning of this proposed project, we took great interest in reading the application
materials (we are very disappointed with the aesthetics of the Mountainside Fitness and
regretted not having then taken the opportunity to provide feedback, support or otherwise, as
part of the community input to the zoning process of that project). After having studied this
projec s application materials, we d like o make known our conclusion to overwhelmingly
support Honor Health s bringing its new healthcare facility to our neighborhood.

We believe the Honor Health use will be an amenity by providing my family, neighbors and
extended community the access to convenient, state-of-the-art, medical care in a local setting.
The current options in the event of an urgent medical need are limited to urgent care (which
seldomly demonstrates any urgency, s all doesn ha e a doc or, and is insufficient for more
severe/pressing needs) or drive many miles away to wait in the ER at a full-size, regional
hospital (and suffer that increased expense). We would much rather have the option to visit a
neighborhood facility to meet all of our medical needs (urgent or otherwise), including being
able see an actual doctor.

As it relates to the project location and design, we are in full support of these revised versions
as well. We are glad to see the lengths that the proposal addresses the overall project
aesthetics: increased building setbacks to benefit the neighbors, limited overall height (at 28 s
a Mountainside), higher-end architectural materials, enhanced landscape buffers, dark-sky
lighting, convenient driveway circulation, etc. The design will also actually bring much
improvement to the visual aesthetic along Shea; which we drive and bike every day.

We would assume the few neighbors whose property lines immediately border Mountainside
fitness were not pleased with that project. We are certainly sympathetic to them as the
Mountainside development was clearly not as considerate of the neighborhood in its site
planning and design; this is evidenced by the end result. By contrast, however, we are
confident that Honor Heal h s conscientious architectural efforts will be a huge improvement to
the current dirt lot, and the thoughtful building design & landscaping is more in keeping with




Page 336
the neighborhood. Frankly, it will actually serve to soften the commercial look of
Mountainside.

Last, I also suggest not to overlook the huge advantage this project brings to all of the local
households and families that will benefit by having healthcare brought close to home and
further improve the number of high-quality amenities that make this community so highly
desirable in which to live.

Sincerely,




The Nelson Family




Page 337
Attachment G
David O Simmons

From: Alan and Lou
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2021 10:08 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Presentation February 1, 2021 at the Paradise Village Planning Meeting




I will virtually attend the presentation via Webex on February 1, 2012 at 6pm.

I have the following comments and questions.

Thank you.

Alan Leibowitz, MD

Town of Paradise Valley

Cell Phone: 602-826-0735



RE: Z-41-20-3: concerning the presentation, discussion and possible recommendation regarding a request to rezone 3.19
acres located approximately 400 feet west of the northwest corner of 54th Street and Shea Boulevard from C-O
(Approved PAD-2 SP) (Commercial Office, Approved Planned Area Development, Special Permit) and PAD-2 SP (Approved
PAD-2 SP) (Planned Area Development, Approved Planned Area Development, Special Permit) to PUD (Planned Unit
Development) to allow a hospital and other commercial uses

I would like to submit 2 comments with questions to the applicant:

1. Shea Blvd. in this area is busy during the day with vehicular traffic. It is extremely busy during rush hour especially
afternoon west bound traffic from Scottsdale. Traffic slows to a halt in this area.

The proposed health center will face difficulties both for entering vehicles traveling westbound that will require a left
turn into the facility and exiting traffic in both directions on to Shea Blvd. This is a setup for accidents especially by sick
or stressed people attending the center for medical care.

If traffic is affected in either direction, vehicles could circumvent bottlenecks, South, through the Town of Paradise
Valley. This will have a major affect on currently low traffic, residential streets.

QUESTION: Has a traffic study been performed?

2. The narrative speaks to extremely rare instances of emergency ambulance presence, mainly transport from the
facility. Yet the graphic on the cover of the narrative shows a red neon EMERGENCY sign. Th at is either a mistake or the
narrative misstates or understates the use of emergency services. The sign is confusing to the public and a
misrepresentation of services or the narrative is wrong.

QUESTION:


Page 338
 Will there be an Emergency area staffed by appropriate professionals?
 Is this appropriate for a freestanding, non-hospital with the traffic difficulties described in 1. (above)?





Page 339
Angela M. Banks & Marcus M. Young
5353 E. Sahuaro Drive
Scottsdale, AZ 85254


February 1, 2021

Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee

RE: Rezoning Case: HonorHealth Shea PUD is Z-41-20-3


Dear Committee members,

We are residents of La Camarilla. Angela is a professor at Arizona State University and Marcus is a
dentist in private practice. We are writing to express our strong disapproval of the proposal by
HonorHealth to rezone the 3.19 acre property located approximately 400 feet west of the northwest
corner of 54th Street and Shea Boulevard. Rezoning this property to allow the construction of a 24/7
medical center will destroy the residential character of the area.

The medical center proposed by HonorHealth will operate 24/7 and have ambulance services. As
property owners directly north of the property at issue we are deeply concerned about the increased
noise and light pollution. Having a medical facility operating 24/7 with ambulance service will
dramatically increase the traffic, noise pollution, and light pollution that the residents adjacent to the
property will experience. While HonorHealth contends that the ambulance will only operate during
specified hours, this statement is based on HonorHealth’s proposed business model. Once the
property is rezoned HonorHealth will be free to have ambulances utilize the facility 24/7. The PUD
proposed by HonorHealth does not prohibit the use of ambulance lights and sirens, it merely states
that lights and sirens will not be used for non-emergency patients.

Having a 24/7 medical facility at this location will have the additional impact of increasing traffic and
lowering home values. HonorHealth has argued that placing a medical center at this location will
benefit the broader community by providing additional medical resources. Yet HonorHealth currently
has an urgent care facility near the intersection of E. Shea Boulevard and N. Tatum Boulevard. This
urgent care facility is less than one mile from the property at issue in this rezoning application. An
overwhelming number of community residents oppose this rezoning effort as we have adequate
medical resources in the neighborhood.

It is our great hope that the Planning Committee will take seriously the concerns of the residents who
live in the areas surrounding the property at issue in this rezoning application. There is plenty of
commercial property in the area that can accommodate a 24/7 medical center without drastically
changing the residential character of our neighborhood.

Sincerely,

/s/
Angela M. Banks

/s/
Marcus M. Young


Page 340
David O Simmons

From: Kevin Engelhardt
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 7:03 PM
To: Candace Engelhardt; David O Simmons; docroc@cox.net
Subject: Honor Health Urgent care ER PV villages


David,

The Mountainside Fitness at PV villages replacing La Camarena was wrong. This proposed development is worse. Stop
this rezoning. This area of Phoenix does not need to be “developed” and you know that.

Beyond the noise in a residentially zoned area I have the following concerns.

As a board certified pediatric intensive care physician I find freestanding ERs to be ethically deplorable. In my 5 years
time in Dallas where such free standing ERs are a common scourge on the surrounding north Texas cities, I have seen
first hand the horror they create when parents and EMS bring serious and often critically ill pediatric patients to
unprepared physicians or worse independent practice APPs without physician backup. The providers staffing these ERs
often have little or no meaningful hospital backup, minimal true emergency training, minimal emergency trained staff
nor staff experience, and minimal tangible emergency resources. This model delays care on critical timelines often with
the addition of missed and incorrect diagnosis’ and out of date interventions. Emergencies can and should be taken to
emergency rooms in hospitals staffed with surgical and specialty medical services. This project has nothing to do with
access to care and everything to do with greed. Do the right thing and stop it.

My wife Candace Engelhardt MD, a Pediatrician of the same opinion, happily give our time at the upcoming meeting on
this topic to Dr Neal R Rockowitz MD.

Thank you for your time,

Kevin Engelhardt MD





Page 341
David O Simmons

From: Darcy Royal
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2021 3:54 PM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Debra W Stark; Rob A. Royal; Darcy Royal
Subject: Rezoning Case: HonorHealth Shea PUD is Z-41-20-3”



Dear PV Planning Committee,
(Please replace this email for my earlier one I sent. I accidentally hit the sent button too early. Thank you!)

We moved into our Orange Tree Estates neighborhood north of Shea in May 1987 because it was
a “Quiet” & beautiful neighborhood. We enjoyed years playing tennis at La Camarilla as a
“quiet” family neighborhood low profile business that enhanced the value of our neighborhood.

Rob is a litigator attorney & I am a former Risk Manager for a Bank. We had many opportunities to
move elsewhere but love the acre lots, space & quiet neighborhood for 34 years, but when you
allowed Mountainside fitness to build their tall, ugly egregious building I CRINGE in disgust
everytime we turn on 54th Street!
Most of our friends & family have commented, how did the city allow such a building in your
neighborhood? So if our friends say this to us, what do you think a potential buyer is thinking?

When anyone decides to purchase a home we don’t look for a busy place to buy, we look for a
quiet family neighborhood. And when banks or real estate appraisers look at a neighborhood with
too much commercial businesses then that neighborhood is less desirable and their values go
down & interest rates go up.

When you allowed Mountainside Fitness to build their eyesore in our neighborhood you helped
destroy the visual appeal of our quiet beautiful neighborhood. The signage is disgusting and the
building is like a Walmart.

Why would you want to destroy our neighborhood AGAIN with excessive traffic & noise
by allowing a commercial entity like Honor Health to back up to our neighbors back yards?

When you allow this type of commercial activity (more traffic, exhaust, noise, lights, toxic medical
waste & sirens...Pollution) like the Honor Health & Mountainside Fitness types of buildings it’s an
horrible intrusion to our quiet family neighborhood and you destroy our Property values &
potential future sales.


There is plenty of open Commercial VACANT space just West a couple blocks near Tatum.

PLEASE protect our quiet Neighborhood and make them move to a Commercial pad as there is
plenty available, and there is no reason to Rezone our neighborhood!

Page 342
Also, please give Dr. Neal Rockowitz time to speak on our behalf.

Thank you very much for your valuable time and serious consideration.

Darcy Royal
darcyroyal@gmail.com
602-501-0675
“The Heart of A Volunteer, there is nothing stronger than the heart of a volunteer, with it beats the spirit of service, generosity and compassion…the health
and well-being of our community, our country and our world.” -Yamada

Sent from my iPhone





Page 343
David O Simmons

From: Dianne Hampton
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 9:37 AM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Neil Rockowitz, MD
Subject: Feb. 1, 2021 Registration Request - Dianne Hampton


Happy New Year David,

I’m hope you are safe and well. I am having problems with accessing the app to register for February 1st at 6pm

I would like time to address continued opposition to Agenda item#10, Mountainside Fitness PUD Rezoning. I yield my
allotted time to Dr. Neil Rockowitz.

Please continue to take good care. Thank you for your assistance.

Respectfully,
Dianne Hampton, condo owner
Milano Terrace
5122 E. Shea Blvd.
Scottsdale, AZ 85254
Dhampt@aol.com

Sent from my iPhone
Dianne Hampton





Page 344
David O Simmons

From: Harold Ganz
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 2:30 PM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Debra W Stark; docroc@cox.net
Subject: rezoning case: HonorHealthShea PUD is Z-41-20-3




Mr. Simmons,

I am contacting you in reference to the proposed rezoning of the land adjacent to
Mountainside Fitness. As a homeowner for the past 28 years, it NEVER entered my mind that
the tranquil neighborhood I love, would be substantially diminished and denigrated by having
the peace and quiet destroyed by the construction of a 24/7 emergency medical facility.

The thought of sirens throughout the day and night, and the added congestion and traffic
that already makes Shea Blvd a nightmare, is hard
to comprehend. Since there is already high quality care delivered at Mayo and the Honor Health
Facility at 90th and Shea, both only 10 minutes away,
our residential community is NOT looking for any other conveniences closer to home.

It is wildly unreasonable for anyone to frame this rezoning project as a much needed
addition to OUR neighborhood. Therefore, please inform the individuals trying to rezone not
insult the collective intelligence of our community by stating in the Honorhealth flyer that this
facility will be offering us CONVENIENCE. Mayo and HonorHealth, 10 minutes away, is all
the convenience we are seeking.

Thanking you in advance of the meeting,

hganz@haroldganz.com





Page 345
David O Simmons

From: Terry Hamlin
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 4:56 PM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: whchristian@msn.com
Subject: Honor Heath zoning meeting Z-41-20-3 on Feb 1st


David Simmons, MA
Planner II* Village Planner
200 West Washington Street
3rd Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003
602-262-4072
david.simmons@phoenix.gov

David-

Becky and I wish to relinquish our time to speak regarding Z-41-20-3 on Feb 1st to Bill Christian.

We as long time residents are opposed to the Honor Health Rezoning proposal. It should be denied on the
basis it is involation of existing zoning and is inconsistent with nearby residential zoning.

Mountainside Fitness was allowed to violate existing Phoenix City Zoning Codes. Because a
mistake was made. The City of Phoenix does not need to continue to violate or even change existing
zoning law.

Becky and Terry Hamlin although unable to attend the public hearing on the 1 st of February. We continue to remain
opposed to any rezoning of the subject property for purposes as proposed by Honor Health.

Regards.


Terry & Becky Hamlin
5432 E. Alan Lane
Phoenix, AZ 85253
Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows 10





Page 346
David O Simmons

From: Gracie Rayburn
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 1:12 PM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Debra W Stark
Subject: Rezoning Case: HonorHealth Shea PUD Z-41-20-3



Mr. Simmons,

As residents of La Camarilla Estates, we vehemently oppose the above rezoning. Our subdivision is
adjacent to the property being considered to be rezoned for the Honor Health development of a 24/7
urgent care/emergency room. This has been a strictly residential area since we moved here in 1985
and the proposed commercial business would significantly diminish the quality of life in this
residential area.

The existence of such a development is just not compatible with a residential neighborhood and
would be detrimental to the area. It would create increased traffic, noise, a twenty four hour
business, twenty four hour signs and lighting glaring directly into our subdivision, and, worst of all
the sound of ambulance sirens at all hours. Such an incongruous change would also cause a
significant drop in real estate values.

We strongly support the opposition expressed in previous letters, for the many reasons articulated in
them. Please deny the request for rezoning.

We are registered to attend the meeting under James Rayburn and will not be
speaking. We would like to donate our speaking minutes to Dr. Neal Rockowitz.


James & Gracie Rayburn
La Camarilla Estates
5370 E. Mercer Lane
Scottsdale, AZ 85254





Page 347
David O Simmons

From: Nancy Ganz
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 4:51 PM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Debra W Stark; docroc@cox.net
Subject: Rezoning Case: HonorHealth Shea PUD is Z-41-20-3



Dear Mr. Simmons,

I am writing to you hoping to have a say in defeating Honor Health in their proposal of
rezoning the area next to Mountainside Fitness.

Please add this letter to what you present to the committee members. Also, please
donate both my husband’s, Harold Ganz, and my speaking minutes to Dr. Neal Rockowitz.

Thank you for all you are doing to respect our community’s opinions.

Nancy Ganz



January 28, 2021
To Whom it May Concern,
When you purchase a home, and picture living there with your family, many things are
considered. We chose a residential neighborhood with retail areas being developed. This was
a purposeful decision, and we have invested 28 years supporting our neighborhood small and
large businesses, schools, and community. Honor Health should not be the deciding
factor that changes the atmosphere of OUR residential neighborhood that we all chose to
live in!
The land where Honor Health wants to build their facility was NEVER intended for their
purpose—thus the present zoning! Their proposal that a change in zoning to clear the path for
their build will be a “bonus” to our area, is laughable! I don’t ever remember a time I hoped
for a devaluation of our property, even more excessive traffic, greater noise, extreme
lighting, and 24/7 activity! No residential neighborhood would want this. In addition we all
currently live ten minutes away from two existing facilities that provide the same medical
needs.
I assume Honor Health is capable of finding another piece of land which does not
require rezoning that will be perfect for their needs and welcomed by the surrounding area.
Life has changed enough this last year for all of us. We are all looking to get back to the
“usual.” Honor Health is not promoting anything we want. Honor Health is creating chaos,

Page 348
anxiety, and anger. And attempting to impose something on people who made choices long
before they decided to interfere in our lives!
They need to: STOP
Think about their actions and assumptions
Observe the reactions of the people being affected
Proceed with NEW understanding and insight


THIS IS THE WRONG PLACE FOR THEIR FACILITY


Please, all committee members, vote NO for the rezoning of this land.


Nancy Ganz





Page 349
David O Simmons

From: Sandy Kravetz
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 4:09 PM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Debra W Stark
Subject: Fwd: Letter to Phoenix Planning Committee

Importance: High




Dear Mr. Simmons and Councilwoman Stark,

It is my understanding that the Phoenix Planning Commission is meeting this evening. I am
writing today about a zoning change that will adversely impact my neighborhood.

The Honor Health Outpatient Medical Center (an emergency medical facility) is requesting a
rezoning permit for the empty lot to the west of the Mountainside Fitness (a new eyesore) on
Shea Boulevard and 54th Street. While a landlocked neighborhood surrounded by other
neighborhoods is truly safe from development, the homeowners directly behind the former La
Camarilla, and those nearby, had a realistic expectation due to stringent zoning, that their
neighborhood would be protected from development that would negatively impact their quality of
life and their homes’ values.

La Camarilla Tennis and Racquet Club only existed because of special PAD-2 residential
zoning specific to that business. The developer who built La Camarilla Estates’ homes also
owned and built the tennis club. The owner of the parcel of land in question is Tom Hatten, the
CEO and owner of Mountainside Fitness. I am sure he paid several million dollars to purchase
La Camarilla and expended several more millions to create the Mountainside Fitness in its
place. This facility is basically a warehouse in situated on property that was originally zoned for
a racket club that complimented and was an asset to the neighborhood. I have no doubt that Mr.
Hatten is eager to sell his remaining parcel to the highest bidder with as little regard that he
showed the homes that abut Mountainside Fitness, just so he can recoup some of the invest he
has made in the former La Camarilla club.

By Honor Health’s own admission, this medical center will serve as an emergency room. This
means neighbors can expect additional traffic and noise pollution from sirens. The Mountainside
Fitness building is basically the “camel’s nose under the tent.” With the addition of the Honor
Health Medical Center, the whole camel will be inside the tent. While there may not be a
discussion now, I can envision adding a traffic signal to the intersection of 54th St. and Shea
due to the increase in traffic.

Interestingly, Honor Health operates an office in a building to the west of this parcel. Has Honor
Health considered locating its emergency medical center in that building? Currently there are at
least three vacant spaces in the Paradise Village shopping Center on the northeast corner of
Shea and Tatum. Can none of these spaces (the former Bed Bath and Beyond, the former
Nationwide Eyeglasses that abutted the former Albertson’s supermarket) be repurposed
for Honor Health’s Medical Center? There is also a large vacant parcel just west of Tatum on
Shea that used to be the site of a suite of medical buildings. Did Honor Health consider that
location?



Page 350
Our community has already been ignored by the Planning Committee and the City Council once
when it approved a big box gym in our neighborhood. I urge you not to make a rezoning mistake
with the Honor Health Emergency Medical Center.


Additionally, I request that my minutes for addressing the Planning Committee be donated to Dr.
Neal Rockowitz.

Thank you,

Sandy Kravetz
5430 E Mercer Lane





Page 351
David O Simmons

From: Darcy Royal
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2021 10:21 AM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Debra W Stark; Rob A. Royal; Darcy Royal
Subject: “Rezoning Case: HonorHealth Shea PUD is Z-41-20-3”



Dear PV Planning Committee,

We moved into our Orange Tree Estates neighborhood north of Shea in May 1987 because it was
a “Quite” & beautiful neighborhood. We enjoyed years playing tennis at La Camarilla as a “quite”
family neighborhood low profile business that enhanced the value of our neighborhood.

Rob is a litigator attorney & I am a former Risk Manager for a Bank. We had many o pportunities to
move elsewhere but love the acre lots, space & quite neighborhood for 34 years but when you
allowed Mointainside fitness to build their tall, ugly gregarious building I CRINGE in disgust
everytime we turn on 54th Street!
Most of our friends & family have commented how did the city allow such a building in your
neighborhood? So if our friends say this to us, what do you think a potential buyer is thinking?

When anyone decides to purchase a home we don’t look for a busy place to buy, we look for a
quite family neighborhood. And when banks or real estate appraisers look at a neighborhood with
too much commercial businesses then that neighborhood is less desirable and their values go
down & interest rates go up.

When you allowed Mountainside Fitness to build their eyesore to our neighborhood you helped
destroy the visual appeal of our quite beautiful neighborhood.

Why would you want to destroy our neighborhood AGAIN with excessive traffic & noise with
allowing a commercial entity like Honor Health to backup to our neighbors back yards?

When you allow this type of commercial activity (more traffic, exhaust, noise, lights, toxic medical
waste & sirens...pollution) like the Honor Health & Mountainside Fitness types of buildings it’s an
intrusion to our quite family neighborhood and you destroy our Property values & potential future
sales.

There is plenty of open Commercial VACANT space just West a couple blocks near Tatum.

PLEASE, protect our quite Neighborhood and make them move to a
Commercial pad as there is plenty available & no reason to Rezone our
neighborhood!


Page 352
Also, please give Neal Rockowitz time to speak on our behalf.

Best,
Darcy


Darcy Royal
darcyroyal@gmail.com
602-501-0675
“The Heart of A Volunteer, there is nothing stronger than the heart of a volunteer, with it beats the spirit of service, generosity and compassion…the health
and well-being of our community, our country and our world.” -Yamada

Sent from my iPhone





Page 353
David O Simmons

From: Kevin Ladin
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2021 7:58 PM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: La Camarilla HOA; neal rockowitz
Subject: Rezoning 54th/Shea parcel


Dear Mr. Simmons:

I wholeheartedly concur with Dr. Engelhardt. Rezoning the parcel to allow for the development of a 24/7 urgent
care/emergency room is entirely unacceptable on so many levels in a residential community and MUST be staunchly
opposed. It will destroy the character and livability of our neighborhood and community. There are undoubtedly many
other options HonorHealth can pursue on land already appropriately zoned.

I also agree that HonorHealth is looking to capitalize on the ability to up-charge for urgent care services by
masquerading as a full-fledged Emergency Room thereby putting patients at risk in the name of maximizing profits. That
is the business model HonorHealth is pursuing. It is truly deplorable and has no place in our community. When
confronted by this obvious fact, HonorHealth had no satisfactory response. Having a critically ill patient show up at this
facility only to be “stabilized” while awaiting transfer to an actual hospital will unnecessarily delay needed care that
could have been instituted right away had they traveled a few miles down the road to HonorHealth Scottsdale Shea or
Mayo Clinic Hospital in the first place. This potential for patient harm far outweighs any “convenience” provided by a
freestanding ER in our backyards.

Sincerely,

Kevin S. Ladin, MD
5330 E Mercer Lane
Scottsdale, AZ 85254





Page 354
David O Simmons

From: Paul Michaud
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 3:36 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: HonorHealth Outpatient Medical Center- Shea (Z-41-20-3) Feb 1 Agenda


David:

I received a call from a resident in Paradise Valley concerned about possible traffic cut-through down 52 nd Street to
either Mountain View Road to Tatum Boulevard or further south to DoubleTree Ranch Road. I reviewed the case
material online. On behalf of this resident, I would appreciate any information or further discussion by the Village
Planning Commission Members about cut-through traffic off Shea Boulevard or Tatum Boulevard (particularly as it
relates to emergency vehicles).

Regards,

Paul E. Michaud, AICP
Planning Manager
Community Development – Planning Division
6401 E Lincoln Drive
480-348-3574 (phone)
pmichaud@paradisevalleyaz.gov
Office Hours: Mon-Fri 7:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m., closed noon-1:00 p.m. and holidays

Stay informed with the Town’s response to COVID-19 by visiting: www.paradisevalleyaz.gov/COVID-19
[paradisevalleyaz.gov]
Sign up to receive emergency alerts & notifications from Alert PV: www.paradisevalleyaz.gov/AlertPV
[paradisevalleyaz.gov]
Sign up for the Town’s weekly COVID-19 Update by visiting: https://l.townofpv.com/COVID19 [l.townofpv.com]


Disclaimer:
All messages contained in this system are the property of the Town of Paradise Valley and are considered a public record subject to
disclosure under the Arizona Public Records Law (A.R.S. 39-121). Town employees, public officials, and those who generate e-mail to
and from this e-mail domain should have no expectation of privacy related to the use of this technology.





Page 355
David O Simmons

From: Judith Pedersen
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 10:58 AM
To: Debra W Stark
Cc: Geno Koman; David O Simmons
Subject: Rezoning Case: HonorHealth Shea PUD Z-41-20-3


Dear Ms Stark,

We oppose the rezoning of our residential neighborhood to one that would allow for the building of an emergency urgent
care facility on Shea Blvd across the street from North Promontory.

A commercial facility in our residential neighborhood would have a negative impact and shows lack of wisdom when
considering the following:

* Safety. There is enough traffic to contend with as it is on Shea Blvd, and noise, and we don’t want to see this situation
worsened by the presence of ambulances/emergency vehicles, sirens, and 24/7 activity. Access onto Shea is already
encumbered by drivers in and out of Mountainside Fitness, a rather cold and austere architectural monster, ie, ugly, that
many of us had hoped would have been at least as lovely as the tennis and exercise club it replaced (it didn’t turn out that
way) and pulling out on Shea will only get worse and more dangerous with the additional traffic an ambulance/urgent care
facility will cause, no matter how attractive the owners promise to make the building.

* Quality Environment. This additional traffic activity will erode the quality of the neighborhood for the many people who
enjoy living here. Many people walk and stroll the adjacent sidewalks and walkways to go to the store, to walk their pets, to
jog or exercise, and to ride their bikes. We bought a house in North Promontory for its excellent location to schools and stores
and the quality neighborhood it gave us. It has proven to be all we had hoped for and we would like to retain that value for us
and for those who live here after us. This rezoning effort to commercial will negatively affect the value of our house.

* Need. We have never felt the need for an urgent care facility to enhance our neighborhood. That said, there is already an
urgent care facility nearer the Tatum and Shea intersection. This proposal for a second facility seems redundant.

* Stewardship of land. It makes no sense to develop this area into a commercial setting when there are many other
properties with better advantages for this kind of business. The Paradise Valley Mall is easily accessed, centrally located and
probably has space available for upgrading to the needs of an urgent care facility for less than building a new structure. Why
destroy something good in a neighborhood, its safety and ambience, when other, better suited options for an emergency care
setting are available?

It takes time to build good, safe neighborhoods. They take care to maintain.

This letter is our vote to retain our neighborhood and oppose the addition of a commercial facility within it.

Thank you.

Judy and Peder Pedersen
5423 E Beryl Avenue
Scottsdale, AZ 85253





Page 356




SAVE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION



We, the undersigned residents of La Camarilla Estates and North Phoenix Promontory,
along with all of the surrounding neighborhoods are strongly opposed to Rezoning
Case No. Z-41-20-3, the HonorHealth Medical Center with 24/7 Urgent Care and
Emergency Room Operations.

The current PAD zoning at this location, in accordance with City Municipal Code Sec
635, was designed to “provide a desirable and stable environment in harmony with that
of the surrounding area.” Contrary to this, the planned development is utterly out of
harmony with the character of the original zoning. Rezoning of a residential parcel for
a 24/7 Emergency Room could not be a more jarring replacement of the idyllic tennis
club that was previously zoned for this land.

Additionally, this rezoning proposal does not meet the City’s usage requirements for
this area. PUD Sec 671 states: “Appropriate limitations will be placed on the character
and intensity of permitted uses to promote neighborhood compatibility.” 24/7 Urgent
Care and Emergency Room operations, increased ambulance service, increased
traffic, associated late-night noises and lighting, are simply incompatible with the
character of a residential neighborhood.

This rezoning is particularly unnecessary given the existence of an obvious
compromise: Honor Health should simply be encouraged to find a nearby property that
is already correctly zoned. As more and more big-box chain stores inevitably close,
there will be multiple commercial properties available in the vicinity, either now or in the
near future. This would allow HonorHealth to provide its services while also preserving
the character of our neighborhood. We respectfully request that this rezoning case be
categorically denied.



Respectfully signed,



Page 357




First Name Last Name Email Phone Address Zip


Tom Rusling trusling@gmail.com 585-820-0213 5352 E Sahuaro Dr 85254
Neal Rockowitz docroc@cox.net 602-319-1961 5337 E. Sahuaro Dr 85254
Laura Rockowitz lrockowitz@cox.net 480-510-1931 5337 E. Sahuaro Dr 85254

Narita Rusling naritameme@yahoo.com 85254
Mike Shano mshano@ascosigns.com 602-920-4124 5419 E. Mercer Lane 85254
jonathan Miller hockeycpa@gmal.com 6028202220 5415 E Cannon Dr 85253
Victoria Ross vbr737@gmail.com 6023215690 5342 E Sahuaro Dr 85254
Burr Ross jbross@cox.net 6026201740 5342 E Sahuaro Dr 85254
Nancy Ribble nribble@q.com 6023003655 5227 E Sahuaro Dr 85254
Kevin Ladin kladin@gmail.com 6026977320 5330 E Mercer Ln 85254
James Rayburn jamestrayburn@aol.com 602-703-5593 5370 E. Mercer Lane 85254
Gracie Rayburn ghrayburn@aol.com 602-550-5073 5370 E. Mercer Lane 85254
Jody Stachel jodystachel@cox.net 480-213-9883 5321 E.Mercer Lane 85254
penny miller hockeywife77@msn.com 6024992679 5415 east canon drive 85253
Michael Lee ylipake@cox.net 480-951-3848 5322 east sahuaro drive 85254
Cynthia Papa ylipake@gmail.com 480-951-3848 5322 east sahuaro drive 85254

Richard Hock richie85253@gmail.com 10221 N 52nd st. 85253
Alvin Bieniek asbien@cox.net 480-998-2488 10839 N 52nd St 85254
Sharon Bieniek asbien@cox.net 480-998-2488 10839 N 52ND St 85254
Erik Lige eklige25@gmail.com (201) 220-9439 5203 E. Sahuaro Dr. 85254
Rona Lige ronalige@hotmail.com (703) 989-0984 5203 E. Sahuaro Dr. 85254
Eileen Shorr eileenshorr@gmail.com 856-275-4796 10401 N. 52d St. #101 85253
Steven Shapiro sscfsls@aol.com 602-418-3001 5363 e sahuaro dr. 85254
Paula Shapiro pss1217@aol.com 602-418-1383 5363 e sahuaro dr 85254
Nelda Levine nelda1011@gmail.com 310.924.2446 5249 E. Shea Blvd Unit 118 85254
Louis Lopez lopezphx@gmail.com 6025130787 5358 E Mercer 85254

Ashley lopez nolandlopez@gmail.com 5358 E Mercer 85254
Leigh Ribble lribble@q.com 6025739440 5227 E Sahuaro Dr 85254

laurie shelton laurieshelton@hotmail.com

sue McGrath suenailsmcgrath@gmail.com
Stephen Stachel sstach26@gmail.com 4803919039 5321 E Mercer Ln 85254
David Efros leodeo918@gmail.com 2484599430 5249 E shea unit 114 85254




Page 358
Susan Efros leodeo918@gmail.com 5249 E Shea Blvd unit 114 85254

Will Ephister Will_Ephister@post.com 5230 E. Shea Blvd 85254
Alex Neville alex.neville@gmail.com 480.389.4006 5249 E Shea Blvd, Unit 101 85254
Mark Aronauer maronauer@palazzohc.com 615-429-3051 10819 N 52nd St 85254
Jack Aronauer jaronauer@palazzohc.com 615-364-7473 10819 N 52nd St 85254

Angela Zampino Angela@ZampinoHomes.com 602-616-8075 5249 E Shea Blvd 219 85254
Nicole Hatton nicolehatton4@gmail.com 602-617-0022 5249 E Shea Blvd, Unit 204 85254
Judy Shano jshano@ascosigns.com 480-390-7747 5419 E. Shea Blvd 85254
Dixie_Normous_1963@pacific
Dixie Normous west.com 602 652-0163 5230 E. Shea Blvd 85254
Sandy Kravetz sekravetz@gmail.com 480-231-5383 5430 E Mercer Lane 85254
Jeffrey Kravetz jeffkravetz@cox.net 480-642-7025 5430 E Mercer Lane 85254
Ben Kravetz bkravetz007@cox.net 480-642-7025 5430 E Mercer Lane 85254

Julie Harvey Jmagharvey@hotmail.com 5249 E Shea Blvd, Unit 113 85254
Susan Brandt suekbrandt@gmail.com 928-300-6648 5122 E. Shea Blvd., Unit 1030 85254
Matt Vaccaro mvaccaro@q.com 928-899-0147 5122 E. Shea Blvd., Unit 1086 85254
Sabra Barnett Sahuaro Dr

Alvin Bieniek Lot 16, La Camarilla Estates 85254
ms.margaret.stewart@gmail.co
Margaret Stewart m 661-332-9102 5249 E. Shea Blvd Until 200 85254
virginijapaulauskas@yahoo.cco
Virginija Paulauskas m 623-332-4522 5249 E Shea Blvd Unit 105 85254
na Paulauskas tinapaulauskas@yahoo.com 623-570-5773 12827 N 38th Way 85032

Robert George 10227 N 56th St 85253

Victoria George 10227 N 56th St 85253

Lou Stools loustools100@mail.com 5122 E Shea 1122 85254
Enrica Carotenuto rica.carotenuto@gmail.com 480-889-4627 5420 E Shea Blvd 85254
Pasquale Carotenuto rica57@cox.net 480-889-4626 5420 E Shea Blvd 85254
Jeff Strom strom@pobox.com 480-543-8160 5122 E Shea Blvd 1107 85254
suzan pearlstein suzan@suzanpearlstein.com 6022064343 5314 E Mercer 85254
Lynn Pearlstein lynn@lynnpearlstein.com 480-363-5121 5314 E Mercer 85254
Corinne Canivez canivez@hotmail.com 602-320-5783 5468 E. Oakhurst 85254
Jeff Canivez canivez@hotmail.com 480-905-3900 5468 E. Oakhurst 85254
Mike.Auxlong_4cm@workmail.
Mike Auxlong com 5231 E Shea 85254
Jennifer Rawicz jenrawicz@cox.net 480-664-3569 5333 E. Mercer Lane 85254
John Rawicz jrawicz@cox.net 480-664-3569 5333 E. Mercer Lane 85254

Ken Kahle cladd121212@yahoo.com 5249 E Shea Blvd 211 85254
William Christian whchristian@msn.com 480-229-0858 5428 E Cannon Dr 85253
Laura Gianas lmgianas@gmail.com 480-694-2629 5428 E Cannon Dr 85253
Stuart Taylor stuart@stuarttaylor.name 415-515-4168 5507 E Shea Blvd 85254
carolinerichardstaylor@gmail.c
Caroline Richards Taylor om 415-846-2202 5507 E Shea Blvd 85254
Helene Spero speroaz@cox.net 602-999-3740 5403 E. Cannon Drive 85253
Larry Spero speroaz@codx.net 602-803-4559 5403 E. Cannon Drive 85253
Lauren Leonard laureneleonard@gmail.com 404-625-5948 5401 E Alana Lane 85253




Page 359
Syed (Ish) Jafri ijafri@gmail.com 832-768-5374 5401 E Alan Lane 85253
Carol Hunter cahshopper@cox.net 480-922-4436 5401 E. Shea Blv. 85254
Debbie Moudy dmoudy1@cox.net 480-9484207 5427 E. Alan Lane 85253

Elizabeth Fuentes azemfuentes@gmail.com 5409 east Cannon Drive 85253
Larry Moudy lmoudy1@cox.net 480-948-4207 5427 E. Alan Lane 85253
Karen Ranee Duckworth Raneeduckie@gmail.com 480-213-2544 5427 E Cannon Drive 85253
Charles Duckworth cbduckwo@cox.net 602-809-2222 5427 E Cannon Drive 85253
Randall Bain crbain@cox.net 602-989-3273 5503 E. Cannon Drive 85253
Robert Wiesenberger rjwdmd@aol.com 480-607-3959 10211 N55th Pl. 85253
Fran Wiesenberger rjwdmd@aol.com 480-607-3959 10211 N55th Pl 85253
Robert King rbking2405@yahoo.com 480-241-7521 10213 N55th Street 85253
Patricia King pattik419@yahoo.com 480-628-1693 10213 N55th Street 85253
Leslie Lewis LeslieFLewis@gmail.com 480-773-4193 10214 N. 55th St. 85253
David Lewis David.Lewis@dlapiper.com 480-707-2913 10214 N. 55th St. 85253
John Raines johnmraines@aol.com 602-622-0401 10207 N. 54th. Pl. 85253
Barbara Raines rainesfam@aol.com 480-205-4279 10207 N. 54th. Pl. 85253
Linda Miles lhmiles56@gmail.com 480-596-8297 10216 N. 55th Pl. 85253

allin1947@gmail.co
Terry Allin Hamlin m 602-625-0054 5432 E. Alan Lane 85253
Becky Hamlin bhamlinaz@aol.com 602-625-6252 5432 E. Alan Lane 85253
Shawn Ruth shawnlruth@gmail.com 480-686-4071 5249 E Shea Blvd #110 85254
Anne Dutoit acdutoit@me.com 718-974-4067 5501 E Shea Blvd 85254

Lucas Dutoit 5501 E Shea Blvd 85254
Antonio Dias tonio04@gmail.com 480-209-4323 5373 E Sahuaro Dr 85254
Marcus Young mmy213@nyu.edu 7168600245 5353 E Sahuaro Dr. 85254
Larry Langford ldlmsl@cox.net 480-443-1968 10811 North 52nd Street 85254
Mary Sue Langford ldlmsl@cox.net 480-443-1968 10811 North 52ns Street 85254
Gary Miller gary@themgroupinc.com 4809514034 10802 N 52nd Street 85254
Amy Miller amymiller@cox.net 4809514034 10802 N 52nd Street 85254
Tim Frohock azrockitman@me.com 6025685200 5344 E. Mercer Lane 85254
Angelina Cooper angelina.n.cooper@gmail.com 6195080955 5414 E Alan Ln 85253
Daniel Cooper daniel.e.cooper@me.com 6195599289 5414 E Alan Ln 85253
Bruce Beverly bbeverly@azgat.com 602-327-8425 10202 N. 54th Place 85253
Toni Beverly ttbeverly@aol.com 602-828-9531 10202 N. 54th Place 85253
Jen McCall jenmccall@cox.net 480 628 6427 10810 N. 52nd St. 85254
Maulik Parikh parikh.physics@gmail.com 7189744077 5501 E Shea Blvd 85254
Jeff McCall jmjk254@gmail.com 602 565 3496 10810 N. 52nd St. 85254

Scott@SierraCharlie
Scott Campbell Aviation.com 480-390-2346 5321 E. Sahuaro Dr 85254

MelseCampbell@G
Melise Campbell mail.com 928-499-9624 5321 E. Sahuaro Dr 85254
Ken Diamond kbd0214@cox.net 602-538-1946 11201 N. 54th St. 85254
Barb Diamond kbd0214@cox.net 602-524-9854 11201 North 54th St 85254
Michelle Ladin michandbar@aol.com 602-565-0883 5330 E. Mercer Ln 85254

Angela Banks Young72013@gmail.com 5353 E Sahuaro Dr. 85254




Page 360
Amy Nielsen toys72@hotmail.com 480-252-0873 5402 E Mercer Lane 85254
John Nielsen john.nielsen02@gmail.com 480-747-3483 5402 E Mercer Lane 85254
Peter Reaven preaven@cox.net 480-368-0926 10852 N. 53rd St 85254
Sylvia Vela bsvela@aol.com 480-368-0926 10852 N. 53rd St 85254
Kathryn Mendivil kaizen21@cox.net 480-348-9969 5430 E Shea Blvd 85254
Steven Kopp steven.m.kopp@gmail.com 480-695-3803 5416 E. Cannon Drive 85253
Alexis Barton-Marsh alexismmarsh@gmail.com 6173145940 5413 E Shea Blvd 85254
Drew Marsh drewmarsh.phx@gmail.com 4804450155 5413 E Shea Blvd 85254
Prabhakar Chinta reddy.code@gmail.com 4802482448 5509 E Cannon Dr 85253
Deepa Biyyam docrad4@gmail.com 4802482448 5509 E Cannon Dr 85253
Smith Robert aerobob1@gmail.com 4804433733 5433 E Alan Ln 85253
Smith Joan aerojoan1@gmail.com 4804433733 5433 E Alan Ln 85253
weiner gerald ghweiner@aol.com 480-483-1655 5407 e. Alan ln 85253
Minkner Jay jmrealtor@cox.net 4805968388 10207 N 55th St 85253
Minkner Diane dmrealtor@cox.net 6026229567 10207 N 55th St 85253
Gerston Sandra sandyger@cox.net 480 948 4746 9841 n. 57 st 85253
Sarah Paikowsky sarahpaikowsky@gmail.com 480-368-9078 5514 E Alan Lane 85253

dtenney@deserthigh
OTenney Dawn landsscottsdale.com 480-200-9268 5624 E Larkspur Dr 85254
Tenney Lynn lynn@dkltofscottsdale.com 480-45-2727 5624 E Larkspur Dr 85254
Roth Todd todd.roth@sbcglobal.net 847-530-7113 5433 E Cannon Dr 85253
Roth Sheila rothsheila@yahoo.com 847-338-4240 5433 E Cannon Dr 85253
Roth Colleen cgroth1@asu.edu 847-477-5242 5433 E Cannon Dr 85253
Hiland Chris chris@mercurytradingco.com 602.538.4195 10226 N 54th Place 85253
Hiland Katy katka@cox.net 602.321.7364 10226 N 54th Place 85253

Hiland Hannah hannah.hiland@cox.net 10226 N 54th Place 85253

pHiland Emma emma.hiland@cox.net 10226 N 54th Place 85253
Audrey Lamp alamp@asu.edu 401.215.6232 5054 E Yucca St 85254
Leslie Speedie lesliespeedie@yahoo.com 480.206.0581 5054 E Yucca St 85254
Craig Lamp craiglamp@yahoo.com 401.215.6143 5054 E Yucca St 85254
Ian Lamp ianlamp7@gmail.com 401.215.6230 5054 E Yucca St 85254
Bill Grove bgrove1946@gmail.com 602.910.3607 10821 N 53rd Way 85254
Carol Grove cmcf8az@gmail.com 602.573.7452 10821 N 53rd Way 85254
andrewmichaelarmstrong@gm
Andrew Armstrong ail.com 480-251-9513 10235 N. 55th PL. 85253
Robert Dubnow bobbydubnow@gmail.com 480-483-2007 11825 N 55th St 85254
Pat Chiccarella rpchiccarella@yahoo.com 602-380-1502 5504 East Cannon Drive 85253
Sherry Brown sherrybrown@cox.net 602-524-3138 5201 East Turquoise Ave 85253
Richard Folz rtfolz@msn.com 6024004655 5448 E. Oakhurst Way 85254
Julie Chrisman julchrisman@gmail.com 513-505-8050 5448 E Oakhurst Way 85254
Rob Royal robroyalaz@gmail.com 602-708-3341 5420 E. Mercer Lane 85254
Darcy Royal darcyroyal@gmail.com 602-501-0675 5420 E. Mercer Lane 85254
Judith Pedersen judithcpedersen@gmail.com 602-234-0597 5423 E Beryl Avenue 85253
Peder Pedersen judithcpedersen@gmail.com 602-234-0597 5423 E Beryl Avenue 85253
Eva Pedersen eva.pedersen@gmail.com 602-507-0168 5423 E Beryl Avenue 85253
Marla Crown crownlaw@cox.net 4809485303 10222 N 55th Pl 85253




Page 361
Dixie Normous DixieNormous_100@mail.com 602 652-0163 5230 E. Shea Blvd 85254

Erdman Tammi inthehoodmooky@outlook.co 10450 N 52nd St 85253

Erdman Bob inthehoodmooky@outlook.com 10450 N 52nd St 85253

Jim Carroll jamescarroll1@cox.net 5426 East Alan Lane 85253
kelly bird kelley@me.com (502) 489-1599 16213 N 63rd Pl 85254
leah odoherty leaho@cox.net 6023639461 5226 east sahuaro drive 85254

Matt Crown macrown@cox.net 10222 N 55th Pl 85253

Frank Medina monamae3@cox.net 10401 N52nd St 85253
Mona Firestone monamae54@gmail.com 602-881-0185 10401 N 52nd St 85253

Peggy Jackson peggyjacksonfeller@gmail.com 10847 N. 53rd Way 85254

Shirley Carroll shirleycarroll9@yahoo.com 5426 East lan Lane 85253

cari miller 6024218279 6930 Mcdonald Drive 85253




Emma Paikowsky emma.paikowsky@gmail.com 5514 East Alan Lane 85253

Dianne Hampton Dhampt@aol.com 202-746-3311 5122 E Shea Blvd 85254

Arthur Paikowsky abpaiskys@aol.com 5514 East Alan Lane 85253

Kim Benson kbenson54@me.com 5122 E. Shea Blvd 85254

kelly archer kjarcher5@gmail.com 602-908-5550 5122 E Shea Blvd 85254

steve hartley stevehartley@shaw.ca 5122 E. Shea Blvd 85254

Joe De la Vara joe@delavaraco.com 602-309-8595 5301 E.Sahuaro Drive 85254

Michelle De la Vara delavara@cox.net 602-316-5333 5301 E. Sahuaro Drive 85254

Nico De la Vara ndelavara@gmai.com 480-473-3722 5301 E. Sahuaro Drive 85254

Joseph De la Vara josephdlv@icloud.com 480-473-3722 5301 E. Sahuaro Drive 85254

Terry Hartley terryhartley@shaw.ca 5122 E. Shea Blvd 85254

Aaron Smidt aaronsmidt@yahoo.com 5359 E Mercer Ln 85254

Jeff Beiser jbeiser@ymail.com 5301 East Mercer Lane 85254

Amy Beiser Abeiser@ymail.com 5301 East Mercer Lane 85254

Tatum Savocchia 602-618-4385 5249 E Shea Blvd 85254

Nick Savocchia 602-618-3416 5249 E Shea Blvd 85254

Luis Gonzalez 623-293-7431 5249 E Shea Blvd 85254

Randy Oppenheimer randyoppenheimer50@gmail. 4803264740 5421 E Cannon Dr 85253
com

Julie Oppenheimer zonymom1@gmail.com 4806998868 5421 E Cannon Dr. 85253

Sean Lille thanositytree@yahoo.com 4809486073 10500 N 52nd St 85253

Diane Lille thanositytree@yahoo.com 4809486073 10500 N 52nd St 85253




Page 362
Rasha Kidess duked87201@gmail.com (480) 991-2290 4930 E Cochise Rd 85253

Reem Kidess duked87201@gmail.com (480) 991-2290 4930 E Cochise Rd 85253

Nancy Ganz nganz@haroldganz.com 480-483-6969 5429 E Mercer Lane 84254

Harold Ganz hganz@haroldganz.com 480-483-6969 5429 E Mercer Lane 85254

Connie Berger cberger49@cox.net 602-996-9221 4526 0E. Mercer Lane 85028

Carol Berger cberger29@cox.net 602-996-9221 4526 E. Mercer Lane 85028

Jason Ganz jganz@cmgrisks.com 602-316-5412 4417 E Acoma Dr 85032

Hillary Ganz Lee hillaryganz@me.com 602-910-0538 4901 E Dahlia Dr 85254

Wayne Lee waynerlee@msn.com 602-348-7171 4901 E Dahlia Dr 85254

Ralph Rabadi red295wing@gmail.com 480-878-4269 10452 N 48th Pl 85253



Mary Rabadi red295wing@gmail.com 480-878-4269 10452 N 48th Pl 85253




Debby Reynolds gustocregino@gmail.com 605-338-4112 10416 N 52nd St 85253

Julio Rodriguez 72ambrosekid@gmail.com 5040 E Cannon Dr 85253

Rebeca Garcia 72ambrosekid@gmail.com 5040 E Cannon Dr 85253

Giselle Linse linse.giselle@gmail.com 703-371-2700 5420 E. Sahuaro Dr. 85254

CHristopher Linse linse.giselle@gmail.com 703-371-2700 5420 E. Sahuaro Dr. 85254

Augustine Chavez allvalleycarpentry@gmail.com 5054 E Cannon 85253

Alyssa Forcehimes allvalleycarpentry@gmail.com 5054 E Cannon 85253

David Dorward forchrisnato@gmail.com 10400 N 49th Pl 85253

Jen Dorward forchrisnato@gmail.com 10400 N 49th Pl 85253

John Jurju dtrounder@aol.com 480-699-4780 4801 E Beryl Ave 85253

Charlton Haerter cph3456@yahoo.com 602-549-1760 5202 E Sahuaro Drive 85254

Sonal Haerter haerter.sonal@gmail.com 602-758-4336 5202 E Sahuaro Drive 85254

Paul Couture azbrandy@outlook.com 10423 N 48th Pl 85253

Robin Couture azbrandy@outlook.com 10423 N 48th Pl 85253

Stephen Kaplan sk@driverprovider.com 480-998-5088 10221 N. 54th Pl 85253

Barbara Kaplan barbara@barbarakaplan.com 480-998-5088 10221 N. 54th Pl 85253

Janine Lobello jlo4376@gmail.com 602-341-7500 5363 e sahuaro dr. 85254


Kevin Englelhardt kengelhardt352@gmail.com

Candace Englehardt candaceengelhardt@gmail.co




Page 363
David O Simmons

From: Leslie
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2021 11:25 AM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: neal rockowitz; Debra W Stark
Subject: Rezoning Case: HonorHealth Shea PUD is Z-41-20-3


Hello Mr. Simmons,

I am requesting to speak at the meeting on February 1, 2021 and would like to donate my minutes to Neal Rockowitz.

I and my husband, Craig Lamp, are opposed to the rezoning of the property on Shea for the proposed HonorHealth
facility. We feel that it would diminish the value of the surrounding neighborhoods. The zoning of the property was not
meant for that - it would represent poor planning and aesthetically would not add anything to the area except noise and
increased traffic right where the road narrows from three to two lanes.

There are other medical facilities nearby, including a full Honor hospital approximately 4.5 miles east and an honor
urgent care approximately 0.5 miles west on Shea near Tatum. Is a standalone ER a good idea? What happens when a
patient needs emergency surgery or another intervention? There is now wasted transport time to a larger facility and
the chance that care workers at the standalone facility will not be ready and/or qualified to treat a serious emergency.
They will be treating patients of all ages.

Thank you,
Leslie Speedie and Craig Lamp





Page 364
David O Simmons

From: Jody Stachel
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 11:45 AM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Debra W Stark
Subject: Meeting for zoning of Honor Health on shea


I am writing to you to give my minutes to speak to Neal Rockowitz.
I am attending the meeting virtually but want to give Neal my minutes. I also want to indicate that my husband and i do
not want Honor Health to build on that land that is west of Mountainside Fitness for many reasons. We live in La
CAMARILLA estates and feel that Mountainside Fitness has already violated many regulations that were put in place and
we have so many ongoing issues with them that we do not trust anyone else to adhere to certain laws in that location.
Thank you.
Jody and Stephen Stachel



Best Regards,

Jody Stachel
Events 13





Page 365
David O Simmons

From: William Christian
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 4:31 PM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Geno Koman
Subject: Letter Opposed to Rezoning Case Z-41-20


Dear Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee Members:

I am writing to request your support in denying Honor Health’s Medical Center rezoning request, Case Z-41-20, located near 54 th St
and Shea Blvd.

I am a Phoenix resident and live in the North Phoenix Promontory subdivision which borders Shea Blvd starting at 54 th St.

As you are aware, the proposed rezoning area is currently zoned PAD-2 SP, especially designed by the City of Phoenix to be a
residential compatible area. Section 635 of the Phoenix Municipal Code for PAD zoning says: “…developments which will provide a
desirable and stable environment in harmony with that of the surrounding area”.

Honor Health’s request will not provide neighborhood harmony or compatibility in the service and hours of operation it plans on
providing and in my opinion, it does not meet the requirements for PUD rezoning. Phoenix Municipal Code Section 671 for PUD
states: “Use: Appropriate limitations will be placed on the character and intensity of permitted uses to promote neighborhood
compatibility.” An Urgent Care and Emergency Room Medical Center with 24/7 operations should not qualify under the PUD city
zoning code due to its lack of “neighborhood compatibility”. 24/7 operations with increased traffic, round the clock business
operations with associated noises, ambulance and otherwise, certainly do not qualify under character or intensity concerning
neighborhood compatibility.

I am not only concerned about Honor Health’s operations in the near future, but what about 5-10 years down the road? To borrow
from the movie Field of Dreams – “if you build it, they will come.” Honor Health promotes their business model to provide patients
with more expeditious service and cost savings by having the opportunity to first use their 24/7 Urgent Care before needing to use
Emergency Room services. As the word gets out and hospitals get overwhelmed with even longer ER wait times, more and more
people will make the drive, even a longer drive, to get faster and less expensive care at the newly proposed Honor Health site. In
the long term this proposed rezoning request will equate to more 24/7 traffic and more people visiting the HH Med Center at all
hours – all leading to more round the clock traffic and surrounding area noise. Honor Health claims there will be very little
ambulance traffic, but in the small print they acknowledge they cannot guarantee the amount. Even Honor Health’s Community
Organizer, Tom Bilsten, said at a meeting in Dec 2020 that if his child was to get sick in the middle of the night, he would prefer the
opportunity to use a 24/7 medical center like this one versus having to take his child to a hospital emergency room . That is exactly
my point! Over time its popularity will only increase drawing more and more customers and all the associated round the clock
activities and noises.

With the current economy and wave of the future there are many commercially zoned areas that are or will become available.
Honor Health needs to find an already commercially zoned area to build their medical center, not one surrounded by residential
neighborhoods - this proposed area is not the appropriate location for a 24/7 medical business.

I am not against this portion of land being developed. I am; however, opposed to any 24/7 operation for the reasons explained
above. This is not the appropriate location for this medical center business with round the clock operations. At various meetings
some of us asked the Honor Health representatives if they would be willing to compromise by eliminating the ER, thus the 24/7
operation – Honor Health refused – a stark indicator of their true concerns for the surrounding residents.


Page 366
Honor Health promotes a viable business model that will likely turn out to be very successful. However, it should be located in an
already commercially zoned area that will still aptly serve its customers. This area of land they would like to rezone needs to be
developed without 24/7 operations and with a business or set-up that is compatible, harmonious and provides a stable environment
with the surrounding residential neighborhoods - the City’s intent of the current PAD- 2 zoning. Honor Health’s 24/7 Medical Center
proposal certainly does not meet these requirements. Finally, Honor Health’s stated operations do not meet PUD zoning
qualifications in the “character and intensity” needed to promote neighborhood compatibility.

I ask that you vote to deny this rezoning request.

Respectfully,

William H Christian Jr
5428 E Cannon Dr

Paradise Valley, AZ 85253





Page 367
David O Simmons

From: Council District 3 PCC
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 3:46 PM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Raquel Estupinan; Rose Ferguson
Subject: FW: Opposition to Phoenix Rezoning Case Z-41-20


Hello David,

Please see the opposition to Case Z-41-20 below.

Adam

From: Bob King
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 3:43 PM
To: Debra W Stark ; Council District 3 PCC
Subject: Opposition to Phoenix Rezoning Case Z-41-20

Dear Councilwoman Stark -

I am writing as a resident, and in my capacity as President of the North Phoenix Promontory Homeowners Association, to
oppose Phoenix Rezoning Case Z-41-20, and respectfully request that you join in this opposition.

This request pertains to the proposed Honor Health Medical Center on Shea, east of 56th Street, requiring a rezoning
from residential to commercial. We feel strongly that this rezoning for a 24/7 Urgent Care and Emergency Room operation
is not compatible with our neighborhood. This neighborhood was severely impacted by the construction of the huge
Mountainside Fitness facility which replaced La Camarilla; the construction of this Medical Center will cause even greater
permanent irreparable harm.

Instead of granting this unnecessary re-zoning request to construct a 24/7 Emergency Room in a residential area, I
believe it would be far more prudent for Honor Health to utilize the now largely vacant shopping center at the NE corner of
Tatum and Shea which already has the requisite zoning. Adding more commercial zoning to a residential area when so
much commercial space is currently vacant is not in the best interests of our community.

Thank you in advance for your support.

Robert and Patricia King
10213 N. 55th Street
cell: 480-241-7521

*******





Page 368
David O Simmons

From: Raquel Estupinan
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 12:04 PM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Rose Ferguson; Adam Grant
Subject: Honor Health PUD opposition


Hi David,

I received a call from Joan Smith in opposition to the Honor Health PUD. She let me know she is opposed because of the
proximity to the residential neighborhood, and there are other nearby vacant properties that she feels would be more
appropriate and already have the required zoning. She would like her opposition put into the record. Ms. Smith can be
reached at 480-443-3733 and aerojoan1@gmail.com.

Thank you,


Raquel Estupinan
Chief of Staff
District 3 Councilwoman Debra Stark
602-261-8623 | direct
602-262-7441 | main
raquel.estupinan@phoenix.gov





Page 369
David O Simmons

From: Raquel Estupinan
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 12:36 PM
To: David O Simmons
Subject: Honor Health PUD opposition


Hi David,

We received another call from a resident opposed to the Honor Health PUD. Larry Langford, who lives at 10811 N. 52 nd
St. is opposed for two reasons: there are other vacant lots/properties nearby that already have the required zoning; and
he’s concerned about rezoning practices in general and the impact that has on neighborhoods.

Mr. Langford wanted his opposition included for the record. He can be contacted at ldlmsl@cox.net or 480-443-1968.

Thank you,


Raquel Estupinan
Chief of Staff
District 3 Councilwoman Debra Stark
602-261-8623 | direct
602-262-7441 | main
raquel.estupinan@phoenix.gov





Page 370
David O Simmons

From: Council District 3 PCC
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 8:34 AM
To: Helene Spero
Cc: David O Simmons; Adam Grant; Rose Ferguson
Subject: RE: Rezoning Case No. Z-41-20, the HonorHealth Medical Center with 24/7 Urgent Care
and Emergency Room Operations


Good morning Helene and Larry Spero,

Thank you for contacting the District 3 Office and taking the time to express your concerns about the Honor Health
rezoning case. I will pass along your comments to Councilwoman Stark. I’m also copying David Simmons, the village
planner, on this email.

Respectfully,

Raquel Estupinan
Chief of Staff
Councilwoman Debra Stark’s Office
Main: 602-262-7441

From: Helene Spero
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 7:16 PM
To: Council District 3 PCC
Subject: Rezoning Case No. Z-41-20, the HonorHealth Medical Center with 24/7 Urgent Care and Emergency Room
Operations

Dear Council District 3 PCC,

In 1972, my family and I moved to 5401 E. Cortez, Scottsdale, 85254. We now live at:
5403 E. Cannon Drive, Paradise Valley, 85253. I have watched this area grow literally. When
we first moved here, we had to grocery shop at Bayless and during the summers, we would take
a styrofoam cooler with us in order to bring our groceries home. Many things have changed but one thing that has not
changed is that this area has grown and remained a residential community. We have watched people continue to invest
in their residential properties. Our area is beautiful and very family conscience.
As a community, I don't really remember fighting the city on a lot of the growth that has taken place.
I even remember when Smitty's originally came in and wanted to build on the corner of Tatum and Shea.
The company met with us and together we planned to satisfy both sides. When La Camarilla Racquet Club
Tennis Courts [tennismaps.com] wanted to come into our neighborhood. They set up meetings at the
community's homes and took the time to answer every question of everyone in the area. They took notes of our
concerns. The went back to the drawing board and represented everything until the community was satisfied. Many
signed up for membership even before they broke ground. They sought, they worked for and they earned
our support.
Now Honor Health wants to come into our neighborhood, wants to change the zoning, desires to create more
traffic on Shea and to force our acceptance of a facility that we truly do NOT want in our neighborhood! In addition, we
feel strongly about this because there are so many properties open to them that are already zoned for their
facility. Building on the NE corner of Tatum and Shea would be a welcome use of the land available but they are not
willing to compromise or go where our neighborhood would gladly accept them.


Page 371
I don't know how in good conscience your council can support this decision. We were brought up to
believe that our elected officials are elected to represent our citizenship and to support those who have
elected you to office. May I suggest that you work a little bit harder and think a little more deeply i nto finding a solution
to this problem. Have any of you verified any of the people that were brought before your council by Honor Health as
examples in favor of this zoning change? Some of our coordinators checked where
these people reside. They are not people who reside adjacent to this property. Some live as far as eight miles
away. Those of us who do live close to this property are begging you to re-examine your decision.
Take the time to evaluate the alternative properties available to Honor Health. You have a solution right in front of you
that would be welcomed by our community. Please show so empathy - think about how you
might feel with this in your backyard. We want to know and to see the democratic process working.
We are praying that you will do the job that we elected you to do....represent us !
Thank you for taking the time to read how I feel; how our community feels and please seek a decision against this
rezoning and a solution that would be very advantageous to us all.
Thank you,
Helene and Larry Spero


*******





Page 372
David O Simmons

From: Raquel Estupinan
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 7:53 AM
To: Joan Smith
Cc: David O Simmons; Rose Ferguson; Adam Grant
Subject: RE: ER zoning


Good morning Ms. Smith,

Thank you for your email. I will pass on your concerns about the Honor Health PUD to Councilwoman Stark and the
village planner, David Simmons.

Respectfully,

Raquel Estupinan
Chief of Staff
Councilwoman Debra Stark’s Office
Main: 602-262-7441

-----Original Message-----
From: Joan Smith
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 9:32 PM
To: Raquel Estupinan
Subject: ER zoning

1. Too much noise day and night.
2. Too much congestion.
3. Empty big box stores already zoned for ER purposes.
4. Tatum and Shea a much better location.
5. Would harm our community and may even lower property values.


Joan Smith
480-443-3733





Page 373
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 1:20:05 PM
Subject: Please reject Rezoning case #Z-41-20 (near 54th and Shea from HonorHealth)

I am writing today to ask you to PLEASE reject the rezoning application from
HonorHealth (Case #Z-41-20).

I live in the LaCamarilla Estates near 54th Street and Shea (behind MountainSide Fitness and the
proposed HonorHealth 24/7 urgent/emergent care facility).

I have numerous concerns outlined below in the form of questions along with additional
commentary. Please think about how you would honestly respond to these questions as though you
lived in our community to fully appreciate the impact to us.

Reason/Description Questions to ask yourself if you lived in our community
24/7 business Would you want a 24/7 business behind your house? This is a business going
into a Residential neighborhood. You bought a home with the expectation of
quiet when it gets dark and to keep the views you love. It is not as if this
building was already there and we chose to move in next to it.
HonorHealth wants the facility open 24/7 which is when they can charge a lot
more for each and every diagnosis.
Property values What impact does this have on your property value? It decreases the values
of the properties surrounding a 24/7 business. Who is going to pay for this
decrease in your property value – Is it the City of Phoenix? Is it the
Committee? Is it the Community? Or is it HonorHealth? It also damages your
quality of life….think 24/7 urgent care vs. tennis courts.
Increase in traffic The traffic of 85 patients per day – won’t this continue to increase over time
creating more noise and traffic pollution? How will the customers exit if they
want to go east on Shea--cross over MountainSide Fitness? It is very difficult
to go east on Shea from this location. If they can't go left, they will feed into
the neighborhood on 54th street. Traffic lights would cause further
congestion on Shea. There is already increased number of accidents on 54th
and Shea. Is this what you want for your family and loved ones if you lived
here?
Increase in noise The proposal cannot guarantee no sirens anytime during the day or night for
pollution those being transported to the hospital. The noise level comes from the
building, patients and traffic. Regarding the increase in noise level mentioned
in the HonorHealth presentation, it would equate to the noise level of a
blender. This is not a joke and is not as HonorHealth presents it as simple as
just spinning up a blender to make a margarita. This is misleading since
people turn off their blenders when done. Would you willingly subject yourself
to listening to your blender 24/7? Listening to a blender for that long drastically
increases the stress level of those who are subjected to it. I’m sure you would
agree this noise pollution is unacceptable.





Page 374
Increased crime Do you think there might be increased crime with the new business going
in? Will people be looking for drugs? HonorHealth can have security, but the
point is that more individuals will come thinking there are drugs to be had
bringing them closer to our neighborhood. They can jump the walls and head
into the community.
Increased lights 24/7 In HonorHealth's presentation, they indicated that there were previously tall
lights with the tennis courts and made the assumption that these lights were
far worse than what they are proposing. This is very misleading when those
lights which were turned off at night. Their lights would be on 24/7 and
bleeding into our homes.
Height of Building Would you like the view from your home lost? The revised proposed height
has not substantially changed. The height of most of the building (not the
tallest entry point) is only a foot different. It is misleading to state that the new
building is several feet lower than the building next to it. Plus the ground has
already been raised from the previous development. Instead of having a view
of the mountains, you will now have yet another huge building.
Location Why does it need to be located here in a residential neighborhood? There are
so many locations already zoned for commercial that are available with ample
lighting, parking, proper traffic controls, room for expansion, etc. Certainly
more locations than what was presented. For those individuals who are “for”
this building, if the facility was open after hours, but still equi-distant from your
home, wouldn’t that be acceptable? This would then still provide an avenue
of revenue for HonorHealth as well as the City.
Change Since all of us is already going through so much with covid, and community,
state, country affairs, how much more change do we need to endure? What
does it take to protect our home values from big corporations coming in and
destroying our neighborhoods? HonorHealth says we need to accept change
and just accept that it is going to be loud (as Ms. Riddell puts it). This project
causes more traffic and noise pollution, impacts our property values, and so
on. Enough is enough.

I am confident if you responded to the above questions authentically as though you lived in the
neighborhood, you would not approve this rezoning case.


HonorHealth has several other location options available to them--they and the City can still make
money off their proposal -- just not at this location.

We have over 275 homeowners in the neighborhood who are against this facility being in our
backyard. I pray you will be objective and not ignore the people whom these decisions directly
impact.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Nancy Ribble

*******



Page 375
David O Simmons

From: Council District 3 PCC
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 8:48 AM
To: David O Simmons
Cc: Raquel Estupinan; Rose Ferguson
Subject: FW: Save Our Neighborhood


Good morning David,

Below is an opposition to rezoning case Z-41-20-3.

Adam

From: Timothy Spooner
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 8:40 AM
To: Debra W Stark
Cc: Council District 3 PCC
Subject: Save Our Neighborhood

Dear Councilwoman Stark,

I write this message as a resident of La Camarilla Estates and North Phoenix Promontory, and along with all of the
surrounding neighborhood residents, are strongly opposed to Rezoning Case No. Z-41-20-3, the HonorHealth Medical
Center with 24/7 Urgent Care and Emergency Room Operations.

The current PAD zoning at this location, in accordance with City Municipal Code Sec 635, was designed to “provide a
desirable and stable environment in harmony with that of the surrounding area.” Contrary to this, the planned
development is utterly out of harmony with the character of the original zoning. Rezoning of a residential parcel for a
24/7 Emergency Room could not be a more jarring replacement of the idyllic tennis club that was previously zoned for
this land.

Additionally, this rezoning proposal does not meet the City’s usage requirements for this area. PUD Sec 671
states: “Appropriate limitations will be placed on the character and intensity of permitted uses to promote
neighborhood compatibility.” 24/7 Urgent Care and Emergency Room operations, increased ambulance service,
increased traffic, associated late-night noises and lighting, are simply incompatible with the character of a residential
neighborhood.

This rezoning is particularly unnecessary given the existence of an obvious compromise: Honor Health should simply be
encouraged to find a nearby property that is already correctly zoned. As more and more big-box chain stores inevitably
close, there will be multiple commercial properties available in the vicinity, either now or in the near future. This would
allow HonorHealth to provide its services while also preserving the character of our neighborhood. We respectfully
request that this rezoning case be categorically denied.

Respectfully signed,

Timothy A Spooner, PT, FAFS
President/CEO

Spooner Inc

Page 376
14287 N. 87th St., Suite C-220
Scottsdale, AZ 85260

602-527-0586 Cell
480-247-8499 Fax
www.spoonerpt.com [spoonerpt.com]




IMPORTANT: The documents accompanying this transmission contain CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION belonging to the
sender that is legally privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above.
The authorized recipient of this information to any other party and is required to destroy the information after its stated
need has been fulfilled. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, disclosure,
copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of these documents is strictly prohibited. Violators may
be prosecuted. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the
transmitted information. *******





Page 377
From: AnnDee Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 3:36 PM
To: Council District 3 PCC
Cc: anndeej@cox.net
Subject: HonorHealth Rezoning effort on Shea Blvd.

Dear Councilwoman Stark,

I live the in Promontory subdivision across Shea Blvd from the proposed HonorHealth 24/7 Emergency Room Site. I am
completely opposed to this rezoning effort and ask you to stop this. The City of Phoenix already dropped the ball by
allowing the monstrosity that is Mountainside Fitness to slide under the radar and violate several zoning ordinances,
such as height and signage. Please do not compound this mistake by allowing this proposed rezoning to happen.

I have lived in my house for 26 years and this rezoning, if allowed to happen, will completely disrupt our whole area,
comprising several residential neighborhoods. I ask you to consider how you would like it if someone were allowed to
put a 24/7 emergency room right across the street from your house? I suspect you would not appreciate it. I ask you to
put yourself in our shoes. We have all invested in our community and do not want it blasted apart like this. The noise
and traffic increase will be impossible.

The northeast corner of Tatum and Shea offers several sites that are already zoned commercial and could easily
accommodate a facility like this. In fact, HonorHealth is now part owner of the UrgentCare facility on that corner.

Please respect our neighborhoods and STOP THIS REZONING EFFORT!

AnnDee Johnson
5503 E Alan Ln
Scottsdale, AZ 85253


*******





Page 378
From: AnnDee Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 3:36 PM
To: Council District 3 PCC
Cc: anndeej@cox.net
Subject: HonorHealth Rezoning effort on Shea Blvd.

Dear Councilwoman Stark,

I live the in Promontory subdivision across Shea Blvd from the proposed HonorHealth 24/7 Emergency Room Site. I am
completely opposed to this rezoning effort and ask you to stop this. The City of Phoenix already dropped the ball by
allowing the monstrosity that is Mountainside Fitness to slide under the radar and violate several zoning ordinances,
such as height and signage. Please do not compound this mistake by allowing this proposed rezoning to happen.

I have lived in my house for 26 years and this rezoning, if allowed to happen, will completely disrupt our whole area,
comprising several residential neighborhoods. I ask you to consider how you would like it if someone were allowed to
put a 24/7 emergency room right across the street from your house? I suspect you would not appreciate it. I ask you to
put yourself in our shoes. We have all invested in our community and do not want it blasted apart like this. The noise
and traffic increase will be impossible.

The northeast corner of Tatum and Shea offers several sites that are already zoned commercial and could easily
accommodate a facility like this. In fact, HonorHealth is now part owner of the UrgentCare facility on that corner.

Please respect our neighborhoods and STOP THIS REZONING EFFORT!

AnnDee Johnson
5503 E Alan Ln
Scottsdale, AZ 85253


*******





Page 379
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
From: Al And Sharon Bieniek
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 8:18 PM
To: Mayor Gallego ; Thelda Williams ; Jim Waring
; Debra W Stark ; Council District 3 PCC
; Laura Pastor ; Betty S Guardado
; Sal DiCiccio ; Michael.nowakowski@phoenix.gov; Carlos D
Garcia
Subject: Rezoning, La Camarilla

As all of you may be aware, Honor Health is requesting that the City of Phoenix rezone a parcel of land on Shea Blvd. and
52nd Street from PAD 2 to C‐O in order to build a 24 hour 7 day a week emergency room. I sat in the recent meeting
with the zoning commission which approved the zoning change. Honor Health's attorney expressed the need in the area
for this new type of medical facility, but did NOT MENTION why it had to be on that parcel!!! There are properly zoned
empty shopping centers at Tatum and Shea, as well as around PV mall. So what's the fascination with this property that
backs up to a residential neighborhood? I was always told to "follow the money". There appears to be two
organizations that will profit greatly from locating this facility here.
Mountainside Fitness which owns the land in question and the Johnson Companies who owns the multistory office
property already zoned C‐O immediately to the west of this parcel. Are they the ones supporting and promoting this??
Honer Health can afford to go anywhere. My question to all of you and to Honor Health is when have you seen a
medical facility that does not grow over time? I foresee the future facility stretching from 54th Street to the wash on
the west with both of the above organizations selling to Honor Health. What then, a multistory surgical center, cancer
treatment center, enhanced ER with not only ambulances but maybe helicopters?? I am a property owner on 52nd
Street (and part of La Camarilla) which will be impacted by the reduced property values caused by adding this facility not
to mention the increased traffic and stop lights on a already gridlocked Shea Blvd..
Al Bieniek, Phoenix


‐‐
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.avast.com/antivirus__;!!LkjWUF49MRd51_ry!MDlArt2HZvG9C826ti2rKH_Ug
_w8sXUy9yVF4msnz2Wul_fKgULo0Bj1YtIupYLYQW3mfwYlO6GC$

*******





Page 380
From: JDK
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 6:04 PM
To: Council District 3 PCC
Subject: PROPOSED HonorHealth 24‐hour Emergency Room and Urgent Care center at 54th St. and Shea

I write urging you to protect and defend the residential nature of the beautiful part of the Shea Boulevard
corridor my family moved onto in 2008, by VOTING NO on the OUTRAGEOUS proposal by HonorHealth,
which has gotten way too far already! This proposal would bring a 24-hour commercial business right to my
front door. This would be horrible for me and my neighbors in North Promontory - RIGHT ACROSS SHEA
BOULEVARD from HonorHealth's NEW HOSPITAL!

How much real estate tax relief will you also vote in favor of, to compensate me for the loss of value your
irresponsible and reckless behavior is about to inflict on me?

How about I find some nifty commercial operation to develop next to your house?

DO THE RIGHT THING HERE!!! VOTE TO REJECT THIS OUTRAGEOUS INCONSISTENT LAND USE IN
MY FRONT YARD!


Thanks.


Best regards,

John David Kay

5407 E Shea Blvd

Scottsdale, AZ 85254



(610) 733-6974
*******





Page 381
From: Larry Spero
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 6:08 PM
Subject: The rezoning of the property on E. Shea and 54th St. for Honor Health. Rezoning Case No. Z‐41‐20, the
HonorHealth Medical Center with 24/7 Urgent Care and Emergency Room Operations

To Whom It May Concern,

I have previously written to you begging you not to approve this rezoning. My letter was extensive and it included
numerous reasons why your vote should be no. Today, I was driving on Shea. I came across a piece of land on Shea,
across the street from Fry's on the north side of the street. It is adjacent to where the new traffic light was installed on
Shea just west of Tatum. The land is just west of the shopping center where Trader Joe's is located. There is a separate
building directly to the west of this piece of property. This would be a perfect place for HonorHealth to build their
Emergency Room.
While I am not in commercial real estate, I would think that this land is worth Honor Health to take a look and see if
it meets their demands: It already has the zoning. It already has the traffic light. In addition, they can still capitalize
on the fact that they could build a standalone building in a "high income and highly insured" areas. If affiliated
with a hospital (HonorHealth), the facility can upcharge all services. If they are 24/7, they can upcharge even
more. While this particular site is not directly across the street from PV nor does it have the zip code
of 85253. (The PV zip code of 85253 is ranked #1 in AZ for MEDIAN INCOME and #2 for INCOME
GROWTH.) This property that I am talking about is not across the street, BUT it is diagonally across from
PV. (HonorHealth can not buy in the zip code in PV because PV does not permit development like this) So,
the next best thing is to open the facility across the street in PHX or one that is diagonally across still in PHX.
HonorHealth is literally unconcerned about the downside for our neighborhood. It really shows because of all
the millions of empty commercial square footage nearby at Tatum/Shea and Tatum/Cactus already zoned
properly."
Please consider how your voters feel. With all this property available to them, they
must get rezoning of a piece of property right in the middle of an upscale neighborhood where
the citizens really care about their homes. Please, please do your jobs. Represent your
voters and protect our properties.

Thank you.

Larry and Helene Spero
5403 E. Cannon Drive
PV, AZ 85253

*******





Page 382
From: jshano@ascosigns.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 4:30 PM
To: Debra W Stark ; Council District 3 PCC
Subject: Honor Health ER Proposal at 54th St and Shea
Importance: High

Good Afternoon Council Member Stark,
I am writing to you to let you know that I am very much opposed to the Honor Health ER location to be put in at Shea
and 54th Street. I am sure you have heard from many of my neighbors with similar feelings. It makes no sense that the
council would consider changing the zoning of this property when there are so many vacant spaces within a half mile or
so of this location that already have the proper zoning. Why would the council disrupt a neighborhood and cause so
much more traffic on Shea when it is not necessary. I am also sure you have seen the literature that medicare did on
facilities like this that shows that only reason for them setting these up is so they can charge more for the visits. Seeing
as how the income level of this area is higher than most, this area is being targeted. If they say we need one in the area,
then just put it where it already has the proper zoning. Why would the city council want to see all these buildings sitting
vacant just to build a new one.

I was very impressed that you made known that you would vote “NO” for the dispensary that was to go in at Tatum and
Shea, so they have decided to not continue to fight for that spot. I am asking you to make an equally wise decision and
vote “NO” for Honor Health to put an Emergency Room in the middle of a neighborhood. This whole project is being
driven by the developer, which very well may be the guy that owns Mountainside Fitness. I can’t imagine that Honor
Health feels like this is the only location that can serve their needs.

I appreciate your time in reading this email and beg you to please make the right decision and say “NO” to this project.
Sincerely,
Judy Shano




*******





Page 383
From: Robert George <314ravs1@cox.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 3:15 PM
To: Council District 2 PCC ; Council District 3 PCC
Subject: Honor Health Shea Rezoning ‐ Z‐41‐20‐3

Council members Debra Stark and Jim Waring,
I have email you both before about the efforts of Honor Health to rezone a property on Shea Blvd between Tatum and
56th St for a 24/7 Emergency Room, Urgent Care, etc., but have not receive any reply. I am opposed to the rezoning. I
live within a short walk of this property in Mr. Waring’s district and many of my neighbors’ homes back up to the
property or are directly next to it or just across the street. The area is a neighborhood, not meant for a 24/7 business
with sirens and increased traffic 24 hours a day. Less than a mile to the West at the corner of Shea Blvd and Tatum is
commercial zoning and vacant buildings. Old Albertsons, Bed Bath and Beyond and Staples are all empty now. There is a
Honor Health Urgent Care at the Northeast corner where these empty commercial buildings are located as well. Just
across the street to the East already is an Honor Health Family practice location. Please tell Honor Health if they want to
locate a 24/7 Emergency Room in this area of town, use one or more of the empty buildings there at Tatum and Shea NE
corner so there is less disturbance of a long established neighborhood. Hopefully, then neighbor’s property values won’t
be negatively effected as well.
As Ms Stark was quoted in the March 31 Arizona Republic about the Harvest dispensary rezoning request – “This is the
way it’s supposed to work…neighbors should have a say in what is developed in their area”. Please have Honor Health
withdraw their rezoning request and resubmit it if they choose for the intersection of Tatum and Shea. Honor Health still
gets their 24/7 ER in the area of Phoenix they want closer to their two other operations and they don’t destroy the
peace and quiet and quality of the long time neighborhood and the surrounding residents.
Robert George
10227 N 56th St
Paradise Valley

Sent from Mail [go.microsoft.com] for Windows 10

*******





Page 384
From: Sandy Kravetz
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 12:00 PM
To: Debra W Stark
Cc: Mayor Gallego ; Thelda Williams ; Council District 1
PCC ; Jim Waring ; Council District 2 PCC
; Laura Pastor ; Council District 4
; Council District 3 PCC ; Betty S Guardado
; Council District 5 PCC ; Council District 6 PCC
; michael.nowakowski@phoenix.gov; Council District 7 PCC ;
Carlos D Garcia ; Council District 8 PCC ; Sal DiCiccio

Subject: Proposed HonorHealth Emergency Facility on Shea Blvd.

Dear Councilwoman Stark,

I am writing about the rezoning proposed by HonorHealth for the vacant parcel located to the east of the Mountainside Fitness on Shea
Boulevard. The land/building owners that will benefit from these changes are eager to sell and make a profit without considering this project’s
negative impact on our neighborhood.

The homeowners directly behind the former La Camarilla Tennis Club and those nearby, had a realistic expectation due to stringent zoning that
their neighborhood would be protected from development that would negatively impact their quality of life and their homes’ values.

La Camarilla Tennis and Racquet Club only existed because of special PAD-2 residential zoning specific to that business. Tom Hatten the
President of Mountainside Fitness told representatives of the La Camarilla neighborhood that he was counting on the land being rezoned when
he purchased the tennis club from George Johnson. He needs to recoup his investment in the property. If the City Council approves this
rezoning then its members are telling homeowners across Phoenix that their neighborhoods can also be targeted and are not
immune from intrusive, inappropriate developments in their area.

I listened/watched last month’s city Planning Commission meeting. There were several questions that were left unanswered by HonorHealth’s
attorney Wendy Riddell during the discussion. Additionally, the Committee afforded Ms. Riddell the opportunity to refute comments made by
opponents of the project. However, this was mostly a one-sided presentation, as opponents were not allowed to then counter her second set of
misleading remarks.

Some of Ms. Riddell’s inaccuracies included:

1) The parcel is already zoned commercial and her zoning change is just a "tweak" to allow the ER. The current zoning is Residential/PAD-2


2) The building is only 18 feet high. The proposed building is 26 feet 4 inches high!

3) She implied that the residents in La Camarilla that did not attend her Webex meeting support the project. What
Webex meeting? Many in the community were not aware of HonorHealth’s plans until well after the Paradise Village
Planning Commission met.

4) Ms. Riddell as a representative for HonorHealth portrayed this project as having significant local support. In truth the
eight people that spoke in support of the project live no closer than 1.3 mi away, and as far as 8 mi away. More than 250
residents living close to the site signed a petition in opposition to this plan.

5) The project is designed to make Shea Blvd a more "pedestrian friendly environment" (this is in her written proposal).
No one will equate Shea Boulevard to a pedestrian friendly roadway.

6) Ms. Riddell also noted that sirens “will rarely be used” by the ambulances. What is her definition of “rarely”?

There is already an abundance of vacant retail/commercial space on the northeast corner of Tatum and Shea
Boulevards, with traffic lights on either road leading directly into the center. HonorHealth currently has a FastMed




Page 385
location in this same retail space. It makes no sense to rezone a residential, non‐commercial parcel for more retail and
commercial space, when a plethora of such space exists less than a mile away.

Honor Health has framed this facility in terms of providing community service. It claims that these combined
Urgent Care/Emergency Health centers provide care that one would find at a hospital, at a reduced price for
the consumer. Ms. Riddell cited similar facilities in Texas as the model for HonorHealth’s new endeavor.
However, several articles in newspapers in Texas (see attachments below) have highlighted that the costs to
consumers, even after insurance co-pays are often more than they anticipated.

How will HonorHealth’s fees compare with those of its primary care facilities? Will patients be billed at an
Urgent Care rate or at an Emergency Room rates? Will it depend upon the time of day a doctor treats a
patient? Higher after “normal business hours”? How will HonorHealth communicate its fee structure? It
previously had an urgent care facility at Tatum and Thunderbird. It is now closed.

Has HonorHealth considered launching its new service model in an underserved area of the Valley, not in
proximity to a hospital? It appears that HonorHealth is considering this site due to its location adjacent to the
85253 (and 85254) zip code where ability to pay may not be as great an issue as in other areas of the Valley.
HonorHealth has not provided the residents with any data to support its claim that their facility is most
needed in this location.

Hundreds of families bought their homes in this desirable area because it was zoned for non-commercial/retail
space. On my street of just six houses, four of us purchased our homes more than 20 years ago; we have
made a long-term investment in our neighborhood.

We have signed petitions, written letters and attended planning commission meetings by Zoom when we
learned about them.

During the recent planning commission meeting, Ms. Riddell noted that HonorHealth’s recommendation to help
with the site’s entrance and egress is to add a traffic light at 54th Street. There are already three traffic lights
between 56th Street and Tatum Boulevard. How many homeowners on 54th Street want a traffic light installed
there? A traffic light will increase traffic through a quiet neighborhood.

Honor Health should try its experiment in a new, unestablished development and determine how well their
model works their before inserting itself into a well-established community.

What happens to this facility and the rezoned property if Honor Health finds that this location is not as
profitable as it has prognosticated? You will have negatively altered the neighborhood and it will be
left with an empty building now zoned for a commercial building.

I implore you to vote ‘No” on the approval of HonorHealth’s project.

Thank you for your attention to this matter and to your service to the citizens of Phoenix.

Sincerely,

Sandy Kravetz
5430 E Mercer Lane
480-231-5383

https://www.dallasnews.com/business/health-care/2017/11/10/keller-family-sues-texas-emergency-room-chain-for-over-1-
million-after-preschoolers-death/ [dallasnews.com]

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-care/you-thought-it-was-urgent-care-center-until-you-got-n750906 [nbcnews.com]

https://www.star-telegram.com/news/business/article3868661.html [star-telegram.com]

*******
Page 386
From: Helene Drew
Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2021 2:25 PM
Subject: HonorHealth's request for re‐zoning property at N. 54th St. and E. Shea Blvd.

Dear Council Members,

Today I had to leave my home in Promontory Homes off of Shea and 55th Place to go
to an appointment. I couldn't get over the traffic on Shea. People have been working from home and
not going out except when absolutely necessary for the last year and we have been lulled into
thinking that traffic wasn't that bad. All of a sudden, with a lot of people having received the vaccines,
everyone is out and about. I ran to Target on Sunday and I couldn't find a parking spot for 30 minutes!
Today, on Shea, at eleven o'clock in the morning - not even at a time of heavy traffic, Shea was
consumed with a lot of traffic.

Before voting to grant HonorHealth their rezoning request, please take a look at the traffic
on Shea at various times of the day. Now that everyone has decided to venture out, we all need to
remind ourselves what "normal" traffic on Shea looks like. I realize that you are probably extremely
busy but please consider this request as an assignment or homework needed to make the proper
voting decision. Try to imagine how the traffic will look if HonorHealth builds their emergency room.
I believe that we will have a bumper to bumper, Los Angeles style, looking road filled with traffic.

Of course, traffic is not the homeowners only concern. One must factor in the noise factor.
More traffic = more noise; emergency vehicles siren's = a lot more noise for a residential area; all
things need to be considered. This building will decrease the value of our homes and the quality
of life in our residential community, Once HonorHealth gets their zoning passed, then in the future,
they can do whatever they like with their property. They can make it a trauma center which would
allow helicopters to come and go to this property.

When all is said and done, I think that one of the things that bothers me the most is that
because of our economic situation at this time, HonorHealth has a huge variety of places open to
them that already has the zoning, would gladly welcome new tenants or owners. Why must this
facility be built in our residential neighborhood? As our representative on the city council, please
help us to protect our properties. Please request that HonorHealth grab on of these already
zoned properties that are already equipped with traffic lights for better traffic control and can
absorb the increased noise and traffic flow without disrupting a carefully planned and maintained
neighborhood.

Thank you for doing your job of representing us and hopefully turning down this rezoning
application.
Sincerely,

H.B. Drew
*******





Page 387
From: Kevin Berger
Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 4:37 PM
To: Mayor Gallego ; Thelda Williams ; Council District 1
PCC ; Jim Waring ; Council District 2 PCC
; Debra W Stark ; Council District 3 PCC
; Laura Pastor ; Council District 4
; Betty S Guardado ; Sal DiCiccio
; Council District 6 PCC ; Michael.nowakowski@phoenix.gov;
Council District 7 PCC ; Carlos D Garcia ;
council.distict.8@phoenix.gov
Subject: Rezoning Case No. Z‐41‐20‐3, the HonorHealth Medical Center OPPOSITION


Mayor Gallego and Council Members,

Rezoning Case No. Z-41-20-3, the HonorHealth Medical Center with 24/7 Urgent Care and
Emergency Room Operations.

I would like to express my strong opposition to the Rezoning from Residential single family to an
Emergency Room on the now vacant land next to Mountainside Fitness.

I share this opinion with over 250 of my neighbors and live directly opposite of this proposed new
building. The claim made by Counsel Wendy Riddell that only a few oppose this is not
true. It may be good lawyering but it is false information. The petition already submitted
shows this concern.
Out of respect for your time I will keep this brief and to the point.

1. There is NO NEED for an Emergency Room in the middle of a residential neighborhood with
Honorhealth Shea campus just 3 miles east and an Urgent Care at Tatum and Shea, a short
walk away. There are medical offices everywhere in this area.
2. Our neighborhood does not need more HIGH COST CARE. These facilities that are owned by
hospitals bill for physician services, as well as a FACILITY FEE that hospitals are allowed to
add on to medical visits. This makes care unnecessarily expensive and will also cost our
AHCCCS health system even more when AHCCCS patients visit this hospital-owned facility.
3. There is a massive amount of vacant space in the shopping center at Tatum and Shea, with
adequate parking. Existing traffic flow diverting from Shea will allow for an ER in that center.
Albertson's vacated that space over 2 years ago and it has stood vacant all this time. If there is
an actual need for an Emergency Room/ Urgent Care in our neighborhood, let them use the
commercial space already available.
4. Traffic on Shea is already a nightmare with 3 lanes each way with drivers going at high
speeds. I turn across Shea to go west every morning and it takes a long time for a break in
traffic and a small miracle to get across safely. This road will be more dangerous if an ER is
constructed on this stretch of high speed 6 lane residential roadway. Please consider this point






Page 388
as a critical notification of a problem in the area. If this does get approved, planning MUST
include a traffic light at 54th street and Shea.
5. My property value will go down significantly. That is not fair when the area considered is
Residential and has been forever. The owner of Mountainside Fitness and Honorhealth's
financial interests are being pitted against the financial interests of hundreds of surrounding
families who are not organized with a high priced legal team.
6. Other reasons have been outlined in detail by my neighbors so I will not repeat things I know
they have submitted.

My expectation is that this Rezoning Case will be reviewed and denied as it benefits a very wealthy
hospital system and a single business owner. One hopes that the Residents' best interests in a
Residential area will be protected against Commercial opportunism, by our government. I am hopeful
that officials will hear the residents and not just go along with a special interest. The hearsay is that
this process is merely just a process and rubber stamp for those who are pushing the narrative with
professional assistance and financial backing to do that. This is so disheartening to me. We
desperately need strong leaders!
The notion that there are not enough people concerned and speaking out is false and a
misrepresentation. I am hopeful that the Council Members reviewing this matter are the citizens'
representation.


Lastly, I am a physician. I am on staff at Honorhealth and certainly have some reservation speaking
out against this. But I feel strongly about this. I expect there will be no backlash from expressing my
opposition.
I have lived in this highly sought after neighborhood for 21 years. Again, there is no need for ANY
Emergency Room in this location. Please be brave and stand up for the residents and please do not
rubber stamp this.


Please leave the Residential Zoning intact.


Respectfully,


Kevin Berger, M.D.
10229 N 55th PL.
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253
North Phoenix Promontory



*******




Page 389
Racelle Escolar

Subject: FW: Rezoning Case No. Z-41-20, the HonorHealth Medical Center with 24/7 Urgent Care and Emergency Room
Operations SAD BUT TRUE...




From: Helene Spero
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2021 8:07 PM
To: Helene Spero
Cc: Mayor Gallego ; Debra W Stark ; Thelda Williams
; Council District 1 PCC ; Jim Waring
; Council District 2 PCC ; Council District 3 PCC
; Laura Pastor ; Council District 4
; Betty S Guardado ; Sal DiCiccio
; Council District 6 PCC ; Michael.nowakowski@phoenix.gov; Carlos
D Garcia ; council.distict.8@phoenix.gov; Tlaporte@honorhealth.com
Subject: Rezoning Case No. Z‐41‐20, the HonorHealth Medical Center with 24/7 Urgent Care and Emergency Room
Operations SAD BUT TRUE...

Dear Ms. Stark,

The question we have all been asking ourselves is why does HonorHealth want this piece of
land when all around us there are open spaces in already zoned places available. We have done
some research and as it turns out, the following is the reason: Greed!

"Honorhealth will not answer the question: Why Here? We now have documents to finally explain.
Standalone ERs are popping up across the nation in "high income and highly insured" areas. If affiliated with a
hospital (Honorhealth), the facility can upcharge all services. If they are 24/7, they can upcharge even
more. Across the street from this site is PV 85253 which is ranked #1 in AZ for MEDIAN INCOME and #2 for
INCOME GROWTH. PV does not permit development like this. Next best thing is open the facility across the
street in PHX (thanks to liberal development attitude of each of these committees). All of this with millions of
empty commercial square footage nearby at Tatum/Shea and Tatum/Cactus already zoned properly."

In addition, we would like you to read the following article:
*******
In another research, a. neighbor found a Medicare Study on Standalone ERs which is a model of care for this ER. "Key
result of this study:
1. Off campus emergency depts (OCED) that are affiliated with a hospital can charge a lot
more v. no affiliation
2. Urgent Care bills can also be up‐charged with hospital affiliation v no affiliation
3. OCED that stay open 24/7 can charge a lot more for each/every diagnosis v. no 24/7.
Riddell claims the “state” makes them stay open
4. OCEDs are concentrated in “certain markets”: NOT AREAS OF NEED!
5. Study showed that these OCEDs are targeting: high‐income areas, highly insured areas
and positioned for rapid growth
6. Riddell has been claiming 70% of pts seen in an ER could be seen at Urgent Care. TOTAL
LIE! This study showed that 13‐27% of pts seen in ER could be seen at Urgent
Care. Translation: This is NOT an Urgent Care with added Emergency Coverage. It is an
Page 390
Emergency Room with added Urgent Care (that can charge more than all of their
competitors up/down Shea Blvd.
7. Study concluded that cost of typical ER and Urgent Care diagnoses were ALL higher at
these centers v. alternative
8. Medicare sees the value of OCED in under‐served areas but the usage of these centers is
simply increasing the cost of medicine.
9. UGLY REASON WHY RIDDELL/HONORHEALTH HAS NEVER
RESPONDED TO QUESTION …..WHY HERE??
10.
 South side of Shea (across the street from this site) is Zipcode 85253.

 85253 IS RANKED #1 IN AZ: MEDIAN INCOME BY ZIP.

 85253 IS RANKED #2 IN AZ: MEDIAN INCOME GROWTH BY ZIP
 Paradise Valley does not permit commercial development so the next best thing
is to build across the street in Phoenix 85254 (Ranked #13 Median Income) This
project has nothing to do about building where consumers need medical
services. It is about Honorhealth going after affluent market share and their
disregard for the needs of the residents that they claim are being served.

This is a disgusting display of greed at our expense."

The bottom line here is that not only will we lose as neighboring property owners, we will lose again
if we use this facility by being charged inflated prices for the same services given elsewhere. You are our representative
on the city council. You are up for re‐election. At a time when the citizens of this county are feeling that no‐one in
politics is listening to us, no one is representing us, and no‐one is caring about our interests, you have a unique
opportunity, at this present time, to be the bright light in an already depressing state of affairs. Big business are running
our country and we really need you to represent the people who voted for you and are begging you to represent the
homeowners from your area. By voting "NO" on this re‐zoning, you can show your constituents that you are listening
and that you care.

Please take the time to read this article... it will be worth your time doing so.

Sincerely,

Larry & Babs Spero
5403 E. Cannon Drive. 85253




Page 391

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

79 item(s)